You wouldnt pay a surgeon to file your tax return, and you wouldnt ask your accountant to perform your appendectomy. The same is true for AI: Organizations should start realizing that different AI providers excel at different needs, from coding to specialized research or creative design.
Over the coming year, enterprises will absorb a variety of these AI providers technologies in earnest and at scaledepartment by department, role by role. Legal teams will standardize on tools like Harvey. Customer service teams will rely on Glean or purpose-built agents. Development teams may choose resources from Anthropic. Marketing, engineering, finance, and HR will similarly gravitate toward AI resources from Microsoft, xAI, or OpenAI, optimized for their specific needs.
In other words, enterprises will evolve from the idea that single-provider AI resources will solve their needs to an era of targeted, role-based, or need-based AI.
Making matters even more complicated, many AI providers are now beginning to roll out their own browsers.
Enterprise leaders thus face a new challenge: how to manage the onslaught of AI needs that are now arriving.
HISTORY IS REPEATING ITSELF
Enterprises have been here before.
When cloud computing emerged, many dipped their toes in the water by standardizing on a single provider. The logic was simple: fewer vendors, lower cost, less risk. But as cloud usage expanded, different workloads demanded different strengths, and organizations diversified their cloud infrastructure.
The same dynamic emerged with data platforms. Early efforts focused on centralized applications like data lakes, but as use cases multiplied, organizations often found that no single system served every real-world use case equally well. Most enterprises responded by adopting multiple tools around a shared data foundation.
In both cases, organizations that had prepared themselves for flexibility were better positioned.
AI is following this same trajectory, only faster. And unlike cloud or data infrastructure, AI adoption isnt happening quietly behind the scenes. Its happening in daily workflows across departments, often without central coordination.
Leaders can therefore best help their organizations succeed by embracing many tools, each chosen for what it does best, while managing them through shared controls.
THE RISK OF AI TOOL SPRAWL
As AI systems and use cases proliferate, failing to prepare poses real risks to the enterprise.
This proliferation extends beyond standalone AI tools. Increasingly, SaaS applications from CRM systems and productivity suites to finance and HR platforms embed their own AI. In many cases, AI adoption will happen by default, not by deliberate choice.
With these tools, teams will also inherit fragmented security policies, inconsistent controls, and limited visibility. Tools that seem harmless in isolation can create meaningful risk in aggregate.
This is the rise of shadow AI: systems introduced to solve real problems, but without the oversight to manage them responsibly. With agentic AI, where systems act on users behalf, those risks compound: permissions expand and accountability becomes harder to trace.
If these tools are left unchecked, leaders will lose sight of where AI is used, what data it touches, and which systems act autonomously on the organization’s behalf. Experimentation and innovation should not be allowed to scale faster than oversight.
GOVERNANCE IS THE MISSING LAYER
Multimodal flexibility does not have to come at the expense of visibility and security. Again, we have been here before. With SaaS, enterprises dont manage a wide variety of capabilities by forcing everyone onto one system. They manage it by establishing shared controls across many tools.
Enterprises need a governance layer that sits above all AI vendors. That layer should provide:
Visibility across AI usage
Policy enforcement independent of model provider
Guardrails for data access
Safe experimentation
Support for bringing your own device, contractors, and distributed teams
Governance doesnt restrict freedom. It enables it by allowing organizations to choose every model they want and assign them across their teams without introducing new risk.
And true governance cant rely on technology alone. Leaders must cultivate a culture of AI literacy, where every employee can confidently evaluate, validate, combine, and challenge AI systems. Then organizations can embrace a multitude of AI tools, safely, and effectively.
PREPARE FOR MULTI-MODEL SUCCESS
Much like SaaS, the cloud, and data platforms before it, AI will soon spread across roles, workflows, and applications. Leaders that build in the capacity to manage all these modelsthrough visibility, governance, and an AI-fluent workforcewill be best positioned to capture all of AIs advantages without compromising safety, trust, or control.
Steve Tchejeyan is president of Island.
Shares in Palantir Technologies (Nasdaq: PLTR) are rising this morning, one day after the AI data analysis software company with significant U.S. government contracts reported better-than-expected Q4 earnings. Heres what you need to know about Palantirs latest results and its rising stock price.
Palantirs Q4 2025 beat Wall Street expectations
Yesterday, Palantir announced its Q4 2025 earnings, and investors breathed a sigh of relief. For Palantirs Q4, which ended on December 31, the company brought in $1.41 billion in revenue, signaling 70% year-over-year growth.
The majority of that revenue comes from Palantirs U.S. customers, which is split roughly evenly between the U.S. government and commercial U.S. businesses.
Palantir said U.S. government revenue totaled $570 million for the quarter, representing 66% year-over-year growth in that vertical. U.S. commercial revenue totaled $507 million137% year-over-year growth.
But more important than those actuals was what Wall Street had been expecting. And Palantir easily surpassed those expectations, leading to the rapid rise in its stock price today.
As cited by CNBC, London Stock Exchange Group (LSEG) estimates expected Palantir to bring in $1.33 billion for the quarter. The company ended up surpassing that estimate by around $80 million.
Analysts were also expecting an earnings per share (EPS) of 23 cents. Palantirs actual EPS for the quarter was 25 cents.
PLTR shares are still down from their all-time highs
Palantir released its earnings results after the closing bell yesterday, and today its stock price is reaping the rewards of those results, enjoying double-digit growth in premarket trading.
As of this writing, PLTR shares are up 11.35% to $164.55. The companys share had closed at $147.76 yesterday.
That share price pop will be music to the ears of Palantir investors. Before this morning’s premarket trading bump, PLTR shares were down nearly 17% year-to-date.
Its current premarket price rise doesnt quite put PLTR shares back in the black for the year, but its definitely a move in the right direction.
Palantir shares had hit an all-time high of above $207 in November, after seeing a phenomenal year of growth.
The previous November, in 2024, started with shares sitting in the low-40s range. But increasing government contracts and AI optimism throughout the remainder of 2024 and into 2025 sent PLTR shares surging.
Then came December 2025, and PLTR shares got pummeled. Between December 24 and 31, the companys stock price fell from the $194 range to around $177. That fall reflected both rising concerns about Palantirs lofty valuation and broader worries about a potential AI bubble.
Where does PLTR go from here?
Despite Palantir beating expectations for Q4, the future of its stock price likely hinges on its abilityor notto continue delivering results that justify its valuation.
As of yesterdays close, Palantir was valued at around $352 billion and traded at a price-to-earnings ratio of more than 230, which is incredibly high for even a tech company.
The companys stock price could also be significantly impacted if upcoming Big Tech earnings do not meet expectations and thus reignite fears of an AI bubble. If investors turn sour on AI stocks, Palantir shares could once again be hit hard.
For instance, Google parent Alphabetthe best performing of the so-called Magnificent 7 tech stockswill report earnings on Wednesday. Fellow tech giant Amazon will report the following day. Later this month, meanwhile, AI chip giant Nvidia Corporation will report its results.
Investor sentiment around AI could be deeply impacted by the results of any one of those companies.
As for Palantir itself, the firm issued guidance yesterday for both its current Q1 2026 and its full-year 2026.
For its Q1, Palantir said it expects revenue of between $1.53 billion and $1.54 billion. Thats more than the $1.32 billion that many analysts were expecting. For its full-year 2026, Palantir expects revenue of $7.18 billion to $7.2 billion. That is nearly $1 billion more than many analysts were expecting.
President Donald Trump said Monday that he’s “not ripping down” the Kennedy Center but insisted the performing arts venue needs to shut down for about two years for construction and other work without patrons coming and going and getting in the way.The comments strongly suggested that he intends to gut the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts as part of the process.“I’m not ripping it down,” the Republican president told reporters in the Oval Office. “I’ll be using the steel. So we’re using the structure.”Such a project would mark the Republican president’s latest effort to put his stamp on a cultural institution that Congress designated as a living memorial to President Kennedy, a Democrat. It also would be in addition to attempts to leave a permanent mark on Washington through other projects, the most prominent of which is adding a ballroom to the White House.Shortly after taking office last year, Trump dismissed Kennedy Center board members who had been appointed by Democratic presidents and replaced them with loyalists, who voted to make him chairman. He helped choose the recipients of the 2025 Kennedy Center Honors, a program he avoided during his first term. He later hosted the event, and the board voted late last year to rebrand the Kennedy Center by adding his name to the building and website.Trump announced Sunday on social media that he intends to temporarily close the performing arts venue on July 4 for about two years “for construction, revitalization, and complete rebuilding,” subject to board approval.The announcement followed a wave of cancellations by leading performers, musicians, and groups since the president took over leadership of the arts institution. Trump did not mention the cancellations in his announcements, or during his comments Monday.Kennedy Center Arts Workers United, which includes several unions representing the institution’s arts workers, said in a statement that it was aware of Trump’s announcement but had received no formal notice or briefing about his plans. The group pledged to enforce its members’ contractual rights.“Should we receive formal notice of a temporary suspension of Kennedy Center operations that displaces our members, we will enforce our contracts and exercise all our rights under the law,” the statement said. “We expect continued fair pay, enforceable worker protections, and accountability for our members in the event they cannot work due to an operational pause.”
Promising ‘the highest-grade everything’
Recalling his past career in construction and real estate, Trump said, “you want to sit with something for a little while before you decide on what you want to do.” Speaking of the Kennedy Center, he said: “We sat with it. We ran it. It’s in very bad shape,” asserting that the building is “run down,” “dilapidated” and “sort of dangerous.”Roma Daravi, a Kennedy Center spokesperson, said in a social media post that “decades of gross negligence” has led to $250 million of deferred maintenance needs and that temporarily closing the institution “is the most logical choice to allow for comprehensive renovations, efficient project completion, and responsible use of taxpayer dollars.”Deborah Rutter, the Kennedy Center president who was ousted by Trump, declined comment Monday. In the past, she has said allegations from Trump and others about the center’s management were false.A representative for David Rubenstein, the board chairman who was also pushed out by Trump, said Rubenstein was not available Monday to comment.Trump, citing the complaints of a workman he said has been laying marble at the Kennedy Center, said the closure is needed because “you can’t do any work because people are coming in and out.”He pegged the cost at about $200 million, including the use of “the highest-grade marbles, the highest-grade everything.”“We’re fully financed and so we’re going to close it and we’re going to make it unbelievable, far better than it ever was, and we’ll be able to do it properly,” Trump said.Congress earmarked $257 million for the Kennedy Center in a tax cut and spending bill that Trump signed into law last summer.
What kind of work is involved
The White House said after the president spoke that some of the maintenance includes work on the building’s structural, heating and cooling, plumbing, electrical, fire protection and technical stage systems. Work on the building’s exterior, security standards and parking are also included.Daravi, the Kennedy Center spokesperson, declined comment when asked how the closure would affect the annual Mark Twain Award and Kennedy Center Honors events this year.Trump said last October, also on social media, that the venue would stay open during construction. But on Monday he said that plan was no longer feasible.“I was thinking maybe there’s a way of doing it simultaneously but there really isn’t, and we’re going to have something that when it opens it’s going to be brand new, beautiful,” Trump said.“The steel will all be checked out because it’ll be fully exposed,” he said. “It’s been up for a long time, but as anybody knows it was in very bad shape. Wasn’t kept well, before I got there,” he said. “So we’re going to make it, I think there won’t be anything like it in the country.”The Kennedy Center opened in 1971.Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island, who in November opened an investigation into the Kennedy Center’s financial management, said the planned closure is part of Trump’s “demolition tour of Washington.” Whitehouse is the senior Democrat on the Environment and Public Works Committee, which oversees public buildings, and is an ex-officio member of the Kennedy Center’s board.Since Trump returned to the presidency, the Kennedy Center is one of many Washington landmarks that he has sought to overhaul in his second term.He demolished the White House East Wing and launched a massive $400 million ballroom project, is actively pursuing building a triumphal arch on the other side the Arlington Bridge from the Lincoln Memorial, and has plans for Washington Dulles International Airport.-Associated Press writers Hillel Italie in New York and Steven Sloan in Washington contributed to this report.
Darlene Superville, Associated Press
Almost 10 years ago, physician and data scientist Dr. Ruben Amarasingham founded Pieces Technologies in Dallas with a clear goal: use artificial intelligence to make clinical work lighter, not heavier. At a time when much of healthcare AI focused on prediction and automation, Pieces concentrated on something harder to quantify but more consequentialhow clinicians actually think, document, and make decisions inside busy hospital workflows.
That focus helped Pieces gain traction with health systems looking for AI that could assist with documentation, coordination, and decision-making without disrupting care. But as hospitals began relying more heavily on AI for diagnosis, triage, and daily operations, the expectations placed on these tools changed. It was no longer enough for AI to sound impressive or move fast. It had to be trustworthy under real clinical pressure.
Pieces did not set out to become a case study in healthcare AI accountability. But over the past two years, that is effectively what it became. In 2024, a regulatory investigation by the Texas Attorney Generals office into the accuracy and safety of its systems forced the company to examine how its models behaved in real-world settings, how clearly their reasoning could be explained, and how quickly problems could be identified and corrected.
Rather than retreat, the company reexamined its models, documentation practices, and safeguards. Those efforts later became central to its acquisition by Smarter Technologies, a private equity-backed healthcare automation platform formed earlier this year through the combination of SmarterDx, Thoughtful.ai, and Access Healthcare, in September 2025. The purchase price was not disclosed.
Pieces journey captures a defining truth about healthcare AI today: the technology is no longer judged by ambition alone, but also by whether it can withstand scrutiny, explain itself under pressure, earn clinician trust, and operate safely in environments where the cost of error is measured in human outcomes.
FROM PROMISE TO PROOF
AI arrived in healthcare with big promises. It would ease physician workloads, speed decisions in emergencies, and cut through the complexity of modern care. Some of those promises materialized early. But as adoption spread, hospitals began to see the limits of systems that were impressive in theory but fragile in practice.
In early 2025, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration published updated guidance on AI and machine learning-enabled medical devices, calling for stronger post-market monitoring, clearer audit trails, and safeguards against model drift in high-stakes settings. The Federal Trade Commission reinforced that message through enforcement actions targeting exaggerated AI claims and misuse of sensitive health data.
Those signals changed the conversation, forcing many hospitals to ask vendors harder questions: How does your system reach its conclusions? Can clinicians understand and override its recommendations? And does the model behave consistently as conditions change?
For many AI companies, the excitement of the last decade no longer buys time. Proof does.
A REAL-LIFE TEST
Pieces encountered those expectations earlier than most. The regulatory scrutiny forced the company to confront how its models reasoned through patient data and how clearly that reasoning could be explained to clinicians and regulators alike.
But Amarasingham says the companys mission never shifted. Our team is focused on building the tools to make life easier for physicians, nurses, and case managers who are carrying the weight of the health system every day, he tells Fast Company.
That focus meant publishing method papers, sharing documentation with health systems, and creating processes that exposed when models struggled, drifted, or required recalibration. Those practices became foundational to the companys next chapter.
Shekhar Natarajan, founder and CEO of Orchestro.ai and a longtime observer of healthcare regulation, sees this as part of a larger reckoning. Many AI companies, he says, relied on what he calls emergent safety, assuming ethical outcomes would arise naturally from good intentions and culture.
That approach no longer holds, Natarajan explains. Regulators now expect safety and accountability to be engineered into systems themselves, with reproducible reasoning, documented controls, and safeguards that hold up even when teams are stretched thin.
BUILDING TRUST
Trust in healthcare does not come from branding or inspiration. It comes from repeated proof that technology understands clinical work and behaves consistently under changing conditions. Clinicians want AI that respects the pace of the workday, adapts to the unpredictable rhythm of patient care, and reduces cognitive burden rather than adds to it. Above all, they want systems that behave predictably.
Pieces shaped its approach around these realities, focusing on building tools to work alongside clinicians rather than ahead of them and creating ways for teams to question the systems conclusions. It also designed its internal processes to document when the model was correct, struggled, drifted, or needed recalibration. For Amarasingham, that kind of thinking was essential for the progress of the company.
Innovation, to us, had to serve the care team first. The goal was to reduce cognitive load rather than to add to it, he says, a view that aligns with a growing consensus in healthcare AI research.
That emphasis aligns with what independent clinicians say is holding healthcare AI back.
Dr. Ruth Kagwima, an internist at Catalyst Physician Group in Texas, says AI adoption stalls when tools disrupt already overloaded clinical workflows or fail to earn trust through clarity and validation.
AI systems that succeed in hospitals are easy to understand, fit naturally into daily work, and show clear proof of safety and accuracy, she says. They have to protect patient data, respect clinical judgment, and improve care without adding friction.
Another independent healthcare analyst, Dr. Patience Onuoha, who is an internist affiliated with multiple hospitals in Indiana, points to the practical constraints that still slow adoption at the bedside. Data is often messy and siloed, and new tools can disrupt already busy clinical workflows, she says. There are also real concerns around safety, bias, legal risk, and trusting algorithms that are not easy to understand.
Natarajan believes this will be the defining standard of the next decade. In his view, companies survive regulatory pressure when they transform their internal principles into systems that can be inspected. They build clear chains of accountability, create evidence trails that reveal where bias may appear, and show clinicians not only how a model works but also why it does.
IMPACT ON THE FUTURE
Healthcare AI is moving toward a world where oversight is a design requirement rather than an afterthought, especially with regulators demanding documentation that spans the full lifecycle of a system. They want performance data segmented across race, age, and medical conditions, assurances that the system cannot infer sensitive traits that patients never disclosed, and they want companies to demonstrate how quickly they can detect and correct model drift.
Some of this momentum comes from damage that has surfaced over time. For example, recent research reported by the Financial Times found some AI medical tools tended to understate the symptoms of women and ethnic minority patients, potentially worsening disparities in care because models werent trained or evaluated for fairness and transparency.
Companies that adapt to this new reality will shape the next generation of clinical AI. Pieces now operates within this landscape. As part of Smarter Technologies, it is working to bring its governance practices to a wider network of hospitals. That means integrating safety frameworks across larger datasets, more diverse populations, and broader distribution environments. It is difficult work, but also the kind of work that defines leadership in a field where the cost of failure is measured in human outcomes.
A NEW CHAPTER
Healthcare AI is entering a consequential phase of growth, where the safety of AI systems is far more important than headline-grabbing breakthroughs.
As hospitals sharpen their expectations for AI, Amarasingham believes the industry will need to adopt a different mindset. In healthcare and AI, youre not playing to win once and for all; youre playing to keep playing, keep learning, and keep improving outcomes for patients, he says.
The work, he adds, will never be finished, because the rules shift and the needs evolve. What matters is whether companies choose to design for that reality. In other words, AI in healthcare will advance only as fast as it earns trust. And that means healthcare AI vendors and buyers must now, more than ever, be committed to steady, transparent work that stands up under pressure.
Ive read a lot of books on building a culture at work. A lot of the advice is well intentioned but to me overly complex. A 20-step framework is a lot harder to live by than a simple operating principle. Culture is something people feel and live more than implement.
Venture capitalist Ben Horowitz wrote in his book What You Do Is Who You Are: How to Create Your Business Culture, Its not the values you list on the wall. Its not what you say in company-wide meetings. Its not your marketing campaign. Its not even what you believe. Who you are is what you do.
For me, culture is created through actions. Its the choices leaders make every day that shape how people experience their work. Words can motivate, but actions are what transform. I feel strongly that culture lives in daily behavior, in the decisions that happen behind closed doors, and in the examples leaders set. When those actions dont match the message, culture starts to crumble.
At its core, culture is the outcome of how people treat one another. You can read an organizations culture in the everyday interactions between team members, customers, partners, and other stakeholders, notes Dan Pontefract, a leadership strategist and award-winning author of six workplace culture books. Good or bad, culture is contagious. When people observe respect and generosity, that behavior spreads. But when they see apathy, ego, or petty power plays rewarded, the culture will inevitably corrode. Wherever you look, culture is an outcome, and it becomes the core of how that organization operates.
When Leaders Dont Live Their Values
You probably remember when Uber experienced its explosive growth in the early 2010s. CEO Travis Kalanick was known for being bold and disruptive, in more ways than one. The companys innovation at all costs mantra fueled success, but behind the scenes the culture was the opposite.
Despite all the values-based talking points emphasizing customer obsession and empowerment, employees defined the culture as toxic, with high levels of burnout, ruthless competition, and ethics issues. People complained about long hours, fear-based leadership, and a lack of trust and accountability. In 2017, former engineer Susan Fowler went public with her experience, describing a workplace filled with harassment, fear, and silence.
Ubers culture didnt fail because it lacked values. In fact, it listed many of them on its website that sounded like ones you read about as best practices in Harvard Business Review. Actually, it failed because those values werent real because they werent practiced. What leaders said and did were two totally different things. Eventually Kalanick was fired and the company had to rebuild its culture from scratch.
When Leaders Do Live Their Values
Microsoft is a different story. When Satya Nadella took over as CEO in 2014, the companys culture was competitive and closed off. It was struggling to innovate and it was losing touch with its people, trying to operate in an industry that required constant change. Nadella knew that the strategy wasnt the big issue, the culture was.
Instead of rolling out a new list of corporate values, as CEOs tend to do in grand fashion, he focused on improving behavior. Uncharacteristic for a tech exec, he talked about empathy, curiosity, and growth, and then he modeled them. Nadella openly shared his own learning journey and encouraged people to learn from mistakes. He talked about taking the company from a know it all culture to a learn it all culture. He created space for collaboration and growth instead of competition and fear.
The shift is attributed to Microsofts dramatic increase in revenue and success in cloud computing and AI. Employee engagement improved, innovation returned, and Microsoft regained its energy and purpose. The company became known for its empathy-driven leadership and ability to adapt. Nadella didnt just talk about culture, he lived itand people followed.
Actions Speak Louder Than Words
Culture isnt what you say in meetings; its what people see you do that matters. If I tell people to say no to meetings but I attend every meeting, people will live in fear of my words. If I tell people to challenge the status quo and they see me actively questioning assumptions, theyre much more likely to do it themselves. When your actions reflect your words, trust grows. When they dont, it fades fast.
Kevin Bishop, director of talent development at LinkedIn, believes culture is one of the most important things an organization can focus on. Culture isnt static, he says. Its a living, evolving force shaped by our daily choices and actions. If were not intentional, it can drift away from our values and become a liability rather than a strength.
Are your actions aligned with your words? Do you practice what you preach when it comes to team culture? Ask yourself these questions:
What words would I use to describe my teams culture? How am I demonstrating those words every day?
What word would my team use to describe our culture?
How am I empowering my team to succeed?
How am I removing barriers instead of creating them?
If youre brave enough, this is a great exercise to do with your team to shape the culture you want, together.
Leading by Example
Culture isnt a set of beliefs. Its a set of choices. Every day, your team watches what you do and learns from it. Thats what defines your culture. If your actions reflect your values, people will trust you. If they dont, theyll stop listening. The best leaders understand this simple truth: Culture is not what you say, its what you do.
At a factory in Austin, a startup recently finished its first prototype: a row house it plans to replicate in cities nationwide to help with the housing shortage.
Row housesnarrow, multistory homes that share walls with neighbors on each sideare ubiquitous in older neighborhoods from Brooklyn to San Francisco, but arent commonly built now. The American Housing Corp., wants to bring them back.
Row homes are an underbuilt category in the United States, says Riley Meik, cofounder and CEO of the American Housing Corp. The company has developed a kit of parts that can be quickly manufactured, shipped to building sites in dense urban neighborhoods, and assembled, helping shrink construction costs. While the price of an American Housing Corp. row house will vary, some of the first row houses in Austin will sell for around $750,000.
From left: American Housing Corp. founders Riley Meik, Bobby Fijan, Harris Rothaermel, and William Davis [Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
The U.S. is actually good at building single family homes on the outskirts of townyou look at the numbers that Lennar or D.R. Horton does, they are building over 150,000 homes a year,” Meik says. “But they are never going to build in the cities where people already live and want to live.
The challenge of the missing middle
Meik, an engineer who previously cofounded a rocket company, started thinking about housing during a stint at SpaceXs former headquarters near Los Angeles. On his way to work, passing through single-family neighborhoods, he looked at the houses and wondered why more of them werent starting to be replaced with duplexes or fourplexes. Like many cities, large swaths of the greater Los Angeles area had zoning laws for years that restricted construction to single-family homes. Then a 2021 state law that changed that, allowing lots to be split for duplexes. Still, few developers were building the projects.
[Image: The American Housing Corp.]
Meik knew that building more missing middle housingbuildings like row houses that are bigger than apartments but smaller than single-family housescould help begin to fill the enormous housing shortage in cities like L.A. I started tweeting about it, and saying, Its legal. Why arent we doing it? he says.
He connected with his eventual cofounders online. We met just kind of screaming into the voidthis is a problem that needs to get solved in this country, and we want to work on it, he says. That brought us all together. It’s something we’ve all been obsessed with for a very long time. So it wasn’t hard to convince each other that we should jump off into the deep end together and build this thing.
They saw that a challenge for missing middle housing was the cost of construction. There were probably hundreds of projects that I was seeing where someone had the approvals in hand, they were fully cleared, but the construction costs were too high and they couldnt start the project, Meik says.
[Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
Shrinking construction costs
To help reduce costs, the startup turned to prefab construction. The concept isn’t newbuilders have been making housing parts in factories since Sears houses were shipped on trains in the early 20th century. Basic manufactured homes, formerly known as mobile homes, now often look more like conventional houses but cost significantly less. Other startups have tried to scale up prefab construction for apartment buildings, backyard guest houses, or higher-end homes. Some have failed spectacularly, like Katerra, which raised more than $2 billion before going out of business.
[Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
To avoid one of the pitfalls that some other builders have faced, the American Housing Corp. designed all of its components to fit inside stndard shipping containers so that they can be moved cost-effectively. The shipping containers can travel affordably by rail, rather than on a truck, from the factory to a city. I think one of the things that has held back prefab to date, specifically volumetric modular, is it is incredibly expensive to ship those modules, Meik says. They’re oversized loads, and you get into the tens of thousands of dollars per module to ship them. We can be at less than $5,000, all-in, to ship a unit from Texas to California.
[Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
Factories can be expensiveKaterra spent $150 million on one before it closedand if they need to be built near each market, it makes the product uneconomical. (Cosmic, another startup that has been rebuilding homes in the L.A. area after the 2025 wildfires, takes a different approach to this problem, building low-cost microfactories at each site.)
[Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
The American Housing Corp. designed a new kit of partsfrom floor and wall panels to fully assembled kitchens and bathroomsthat can be built in an automated factory and then shipped to a site for quick assembly. The core materials, like steel and fiberglass reinforced cement panels, are more common in automotive or aerospace than housing, he says.
Designing a system for multistory homes was a challenge. “I think most people thought we were crazy for choosing to build a three-story home as our first,” says Meik. “The structural engineering, assembly process, and equipment required are completely different than building something as simple as a backyard home. But we believe that the only way to solve the housing crisis is by building missing-middle housing at scale. And we felt that row homes were the obvious choice.”
[Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
A new manufacturing model
The company started building a minimum viable factory last summer to begin testing its manufacturing process, and then started building a prototype house. They deliberately took it slowlydesigning and building one floor, learning from it before building the second floor, and then refining the process again before building the third floor.
As the team experimented with the first house, the total manufacturing time took weeks, but as it begins operations, it will move much more quickly. The company is now planning a new factory that aims to build one home per day. Right now, the early factory is churning out building parts that are being sent to Intertek, a certification company, for testing. After certification, the company plans to begin building homes in its first factory this year, while the new, larger factory is under construction.
[Photo: The American Housing Corp.]
When the parts are delivered to a building site, theyre designed to be assembled with a crane in days. All of this shrinks costs enough that projects can pencil out, Meik says.
The company also plans to act as a developer, working with partners to buy land on empty lots in dense neighborhoods, so that it can handle the entire process. “Our biggest learning from other [prefab] companies is that in order to have full control of what you build and how you build it (and truly be able to innovate in the way homes are built), you need to be both the prefab company and the real estate development firm,” Meik says. “Vertical integration has given us the freedom on the engineering side to redesign the home from the ground up in order to make it mass-producible in a factory setting. We don’t use two-by-fours, drywall, or hammers and nails. Our homes are designed to be built with machines.”
Using density to lower housing costs
For consumers, the biggest reason that the homes can be more affordable is density. Land is the most expensive thing in the areas that we want to build in, Meik says. So the only way that we can really decrease cost for the end customer is by fitting as many homes on a certain piece of land as we can.
The humble tripod is an unheralded but essential part of any film or photo shoot. It’s the key to making shots level and pans smooth, and as a piece of equipment it’s seemingly about as simple as can be, with three legs and a mount at the top. But as any photographer or filmmaker knows, setting up a tripod properly can involve dozens of moving parts, clamps, pivots, and adjustments.
A new tripod system from Italian camera equipment maker Manfrotto turns this setup into a single fluid motion.
[Photo: Manfrotto/Layer Design]
The Manfrotto Ones unique design allows for all three of its legs to be deployed simultaneously, extending out to the desired length in concert, each locking in place with a single lever. Thanks to a ball-based hub at the top of the tripod, the camera can be leveled in another single motion. And a custom-designed mount makes it possible to swap out cameras within seconds.
[Photo: Manfrotto/Layer Design]
The idea was to adapt this essential piece of gear to the way content creators are blending their media types. It’s increasingly common for content producersfrom social media amateurs to film and photography prosto quickly move from still cameras to mobile phones, toggle between photo and film, and alternate between horizontal and vertical frames.
Designed by the London industrial design studio Layer, the Manfrotto One tripod was reconsidered from every angle to be easier to use and more adaptable to dynamic conditions. “Much of the brief was around quickness,” says industrial designer Benjamin Hubert, founder of Layer. “You’re quickly moving or panning a camera, then you’re able to snap it off and do some handheld shots, and then [you can put the camera] back on and quickly reset the height or the angle of the setup. It’s those transitional elements that allow for speed of use and as frictionless interaction as possible.”
Seeing the One as a once-in-a-decade flagship product, Manfrotto has made an eight-figure investment in this new platform. It’s partly an effort to meet changing user needs, but also to stay ahead of the competition. “They’re seeing a lot of people enter the space, a lot of inexpensive products, a lot of commodity, a lot of things out of China and other parts of the world,” Hubert says. “They needed to move the needle and create something that was a big step forward.”
[Photo: Manfrotto/Layer Design]
Designing a new tripod
Despite the seemingly simple makeup of a tripod, it’s a highly complex piece of equipment, and redesigning it to function quickly was far from straightforward. Manfrotto reached out about two years ago to Layer, known for its conceptual and product work ranging from airplane seats to wheelchairs to cryptocurrency wallets to dog toys. Hubert and his team broke the tripod down to what ended up being hundreds of individual components and reconsidered what made them work smoothly.
“All the adjustment levers, all the attachment points, all the joints, everything is there because it has to be there from a functional point of view,” Hubert says. “Managing all of that noise and that amount of elements became one of the biggest challenges.”
[Photo: Manfrotto/Layer Design]
After churning through hundreds of prototyped components and narrowing them down to a series of viable options, Layer presented its designs as a kit of parts, with interchangeable elements and a shared logic. Combining the best bits, they dialed in on what became the One.
Prioritizing how quickly the tripod could unfurl and how easily users could swap cameras on and off, Layer’s design focused on the size and placement of its key levers, making sure they could be manipulated almost effortlessly. The designers rethought th tripod’s conventional telescoping legs and created a system for the legs to extend both up and down from a central shaft, allowing the length to be controlled by a single lever. And rather than hiding parts or masking the functional elements of the tripod, Layer opted to accentuate the most critical moving parts in its overall form factor. “It’s like a skeleton constantly on display,” Hubert says.
With the Manfrotto One tripod system’s retail price starting at $499, this may not be the gear for the average TikTok user. But the Ones clever design and adaptable use may even have amateurs looking at their old tripods with an unexpected level of scorn.
The record-breaking Falcons Flight roller coaster starts out slow, but don’t be fooled. Seconds into the ride at the new Six Flags Qiddiya City in Saudi Arabia, passengers are jolted into a high-speed journey that ascends mountainsides, passes through dark tunnels, and then does it all over again.
The ride reaches a height of nearly 640 feet, lasts for nearly 3.5 minutes, and travels more than 2.6 miles. It’s the largest, longest, and fastest roller coaster in the world, reaching peak speeds of about 155 mph. To make it, a European design and manufacturing company used the most powerful electro-magnetic propulsion system on the market.
Though Saudi Arabia just killed plans for the Line, its futuristic 150-mile-long city, it now holds records at its park, including the world’s tallest inversion on a roller coaster and the world’s tallest pendulum ride.
[Photo: Six Flags Qiddiya City]
Falcons Flight holds the speed, height, and length records for roller coasters, according to Intamin Amusement Rides, the Liechtenstein-based company that designed it. Founded in 1967, the company’s work spans from monorails in Moscow to an observation tower in Argentina, and includes what it claims was the world’s first giant drop ride in 1995. It says its newest roller coaster is part of “a commitment to pushing boundaries.”
Intamin’s linear synchronous motors (LSM) drive system gives Falcons Flight an edge in terms of engineering. LSMs use electro-magnetic propulsion to move the ride forward through permanent magnets on the coaster train and electromagnets on the tracks. That’s different from other methods, like an old-school chain lift pulled by a motor, or a hydraulic launch. With LSMs, a moving magnetic field pulls the train forward.
LSMs debuted on two Intamin-designed ridesSuperman: Escape From Krypton at Six Flags Magic Mountain in Valencia, California, and the Tower of Terror II ride at Dreamworld in Australia, both of which opened in 1997. Today, it’s a popular way to build roller coasters because it’s more efficient and cheaper to run. It’s also super fast.
Intamin says Falcons Flight was was always intended to break records; the bird-shaped trains were designed to be aerodynamic, with windshields “engineered to pierce through the air,” not to mention save riders’ eyes from all that wind.
The Six Flags Qiddiya City opening late last year came after the November closure of Six Flags America just east of Washington, D.C. Six Flags announced later that month that more closures are forthcoming for underperforming parks. The Quiddiya City park is its first outside the United States.
At the 2026 Detroit Auto Show, the spotlight quietly shifted. Electric vehicles, once framed as the inevitable future of the industry, were no longer the centerpiece. Instead, automakers emphasized hybrids, updated gasoline models and incremental efficiency improvements.
The show, held in January, reflected an industry recalibration happening in real time: Ford and General Motors had recently announced $19.5 billion and $6 billion in EV-related write-downs, respectively, reflecting the losses they expect as they unwind or delay parts of their electric vehicle plans.
The message from Detroit was unmistakable: The U.S. is pulling back from a transition that much of the world is accelerating.
That retreat carries consequences far beyond showroom floors.
In China, Europe, and a growing number of emerging markets, including Vietnam and Indonesia, electric vehicles now make up a higher share of new passenger vehicle sales than in the United States.
That means the U.S. pullback on EV production is not simply a climate problemgasoline-powered vehicles are a major contributor to climate changeit is also an industrial competitiveness problem, with direct implications for the future of U.S. automakers, suppliers, and autoworkers. Slower EV production and slower adoption in the U.S. can keep prices higher, delay improvements in batteries and software, and increase the risk that the next generation of automotive value creation will happen elsewhere.
Where EVs are taking over
In 2025, global EV registrations rose 20% to 20.7 million. Analysts with Benchmark Mineral Intelligence reported that China reached 12.9 million EV registrations, up 17% from the previous year; Europe recorded 4.3 million, up 33%; and the rest of the world added 1.7 million, up 48%.
By contrast, U.S. EV sales growth was essentially flat in 2025, at about 1%. U.S. automaker Tesla experienced declines in both scale and profitabilityits vehicle deliveries fell 9% compared to 2024, the companys net profit was down 46%, and CEO Elon Musk said it would put more of its focus on artificial intelligence and robotics.
Market share tells a similar story and also challenges the assumption that vehicle electrification would take time to expand from wealthy countries to emerging markets.
In 39 countries, EVs now exceed 10% of new car sales, including in Vietnam, Thailand, and Indonesia, which reached 38%, 21%, and 15%, respectively, in 2025, energy analysts at Ember report.
In the U.S., EVs accounted for less than 10% of new vehicle sales, by Embers estimates.
U.S. President Donald Trump came back into office in 2025 promising to end policies that supported EV production and sales and boost fossil fuels. But while the U.S. was curtailing federal consumer incentives, governments elsewhere largely continued a transition to electric vehicles.
Europe softened its goal for all vehicles to have zero emissions by 2035 at the urging of automakers, but its new target is still a 90% cut in automobiles carbon dioxide emissions by 2035.
Germany launched a program offering subsidies worth 1,500 to 6,000 euros per electric vehicle, aimed at low- and middle-income households.
In developing economies, EV policy has largely been sustained through industrial policies. In Brazil, the MOVER program offers tax credits explicitly linked to domestic EV production, research and development, and efficiency targets. South Africa is introducing a 150% investment allowance for EV and battery manufacturing, giving them a tax break starting in March 2026. Thailand has implemented subsidies and reduced excise tax tied to mandatory local production and export commitments.
In China, the EV industry has entered a phase of regulatory maturity. After a decade of subsidies and state-led investment that helped domestic firms undercut global competitors, the governments focus is no longer on explosive growth at home.
With their domestic market saturated and competition fierce, Chinese automakers are pushing aggressively into global markets. Beijing has reinforced this shift by ending its full tax exemption for EV purchases and replacing it with a tapered 5% tax on EV buyers.
Consequences for U.S. automakers
EV manufacturing is governed by steep learning curves and scale economies, meaning the more vehicles a company builds, the better it gets at making them faster and cheaper. Low domestic production and sales can mean higher costs for parts and weaker bargaining power for automakers in global supply chains.
The competitive landscape is already changing. In 2025, China exported 2.65 million EVs, doubling its 2024 exports, according to the China Association of Automobile Manufacturers. And BYD surpassed Tesla as the worlds largest EV maker in 2025.
The U.S. risks becoming a follower in the industry it once defined.
Some people argue that American consumers simply prefer trucks and hybrids. Others point to Chinese subsidies and overcapacity as distortions that justify U.S. industry caution. These concerns deserve consideration, but they do not outweigh the fundamental fact that, globally, the EV share of auto sales continues to rise.
What can the U.S. do?
For U.S. automakers and workers to compete in this market, the government, in our view, will have to stop treating EVs as an ideological matter and start governing it like an industrial transition.
That starts with restoring regulatory credibility, something that seems unlikely right now as the Trump administration moves to roll back vehicle emissions standards. Performance standards are the quiet engine of industrial investment. When standards are predictable and enforced, manufacturers can plan, suppliers can invest in new businesses, and workers can train for reliable demand.
Governments at state and local levels and industry can also take important steps.
Focus on affordability and equity: The federal clean-vehicle tax credit that effectively gave EV buyers a discount expired in September 2025. An alternative is targeted, point-of-sale support for low- and middle-income buyers. By moving away from blanket credits in favor of targeted incentivesa model already used in California and Pennsylvaniagovernments can ensure public funds are directed toward people who are currently priced out of the EV market. Additionally, interest-rate buydowns that allow buyers to reduce their loan payments and green loan programs can help, typically funded through state and local governments, utility companies or federal grants.
Keep building out the charging network: A federal judge ruled on January 23, 2026, that the Trump administration violated the law when it suspended a $5 billion program for expanding the nations EV charger network. That expansion effort can be improved by shifting the focus from the number of ports installed to the number of working chargers, as California did in 2025. Enforcing reliability and clearing bottlenecks, such as electricity connections and payment systems, could help boost the number of functioning sites.
Use fleet procurement as a stabilizer for U.S. sales: When states, cities and companies provide a predictable volume of vehicle purchases, that helps manufacturers plan future investments. For example, Amazons 2019 order of 100,000 Rivian electric delivery vehicles to be delivered over the following decade gave the startup automaker the boost it needed.
Treat workforce transition as core infrastructure: This means giving workers skills they can carry from job to job, helping suppliers retool instead of shutting down, and coordinating training with employers needs. Done right, these investments turn economic change into a source of stable jobs and broad public support. Done poorly, they risk a political backlash.
The scene at the Detroit Auto Show should be a warning, not a verdict. The global auto industry is accelerating its EV transition. The question for the United States is whether it will shape that futureand ensure the technologies and jobs of the next automotive era are in the U.S.or import it.
Hengrui Liu is a postdoctoral scholar in economics and public policy at the Fletcher School at Tufts University.
Kelly Sims Gallagher is a professor of energy and environmental policy and director of the Climate Policy Lab and Center for International Environment and Resource Policy at the Fletcher School at Tufts University.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
The only constant in life is change. This truth is as salient today as it was when the ancient Greek philosopher Heraclitus posited the idea centuries ago. Its a truth that most modern leaders know firsthand, especially when it comes to culture. Culture is in constant flux. Emergent ideas are introduced to an organizationbe they new technologies or nascent philosophieswhich catalyze new imaginations and result in new ways of work. However, the question isnt if things will change but how and when? So, we sat down with the former CMO of McDonalds North America, Tariq Hassan, for this weeks episode of the From the Culture podcast to talk about cultural change and how leaders can best navigate it.
As Hassan poetically puts it, every organization is haunted by the ghosts of cultures past. These are the existing conventions of an organization that were once introduced and integrated into its operating system but linger about even after a leader departs. Some were advantageous in the moment but perhaps soured over time. Others were likely rejected at first glance but eventually revealed themselves to be useful. These cultural contributions can be edifying or detrimental to an organization. Therefore, its incumbent upon new leaders to identify which ghosts should be summoned and which ought to be exorcised.
{"blockType":"mv-promo-block","data":{"imageDesktopUrl":"https:\/\/images.fastcompany.com\/image\/upload\/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit\/wp-cms-2\/2026\/01\/studio_16-9.jpg","imageMobileUrl":"https:\/\/images.fastcompany.com\/image\/upload\/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit\/wp-cms-2\/2026\/01\/studio_square_thumbnail.jpg","eyebrow":"","headline":"FROM THE CULTURE","dek":"FROM THE CULTURE is a podcast that explores the inner workings of organizational culture that enable companies to thrive, teams to win, and brands to succeed. If culture eats strategy for breakfast, then this is the most important conversation in business that you arent having.","subhed":"","description":"","ctaText":"Listen","ctaUrl":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/playlist?list=PLvojPSJ6Iy0T4VojdtGsZ8Q4eAJ6mzr2h","theme":{"bg":"#2b2d30","text":"#ffffff","eyebrow":"#9aa2aa","subhed":"#ffffff","buttonBg":"#3b3f46","buttonHoverBg":"#3b3f46","buttonText":"#ffffff"},"imageDesktopId":91470870,"imageMobileId":91470866,"shareable":false,"slug":""}}
How Will I Know
According to Hassan, a trained strategist turned C-suite executive, culture should evolve but also remain static. This dynamic might seem paradoxical on the surface, but it is empirically supported by the literature. Famed anthropologist Grant McCracken refers to this as fast and slow culture. Slow culture consists of the deeply held beliefs and assumptions of an organization that inform how we do things around here. Fast culture, on the other hand, is a reflection of the organizations beliefs in a contemporary context, based on the realities of today. They both exist at the same time but change at different rates.
Slow culture moves at a glacier pace, if at all. This is the static nature of culture that Hassan argues is the anchor of an organization that keeps it stable. Fast culture is far more temporalthe evolving parts of Hassans cultural calculus. When considering change, new leaders must distinguish between the fast and the slow, which parts must be revisited (the fast) and which should be reinforced (the slow). This is where reenvisioning comes into play for the CEO and executions become contextualized for managers.
Three Ideas
To navigate these complexities, Hassan offers three recommendations. First, leaders must approach change with great humility. This means realizing that someone was there before you who helped get the organization to where it is today. As good as you may be, you cant enter the company thinking Everyone here is incompetent and only I, alone, will save it. Doing so is to ignore the cultural conventions that ushered in its past successes or, worse, it may lead you to erroneously mistake them for the lingering conventions that may have prevented the organization from thriving. Discerning the differences is key.
Secondly, Hassan suggests adopting a curious mindset. As a leader, hes far more infatuated with questions than he is with answers. Questions invite other members of the organization who have experienced previous cultures to contribute to the exploration of change. It allows leaders to brain surf the institutional knowledge that already exists and leverage the endowment effect so that members of the team feel a sense of ownership in the change. That way, they are a part of the change as opposed to the change happening to them.
Lastly, Hassan emphasizes the importance of empathyself-aware perspective taking. Considering the kaleidoscope of meanings the world presents to our collective sense; having more perspectives provides a vivid picture of the organizations reality, which helps you, as a leader, lead change more effectively. This, as Hassan notes, is not only true of business culture but also of culture more broadly. And thats spot-on. Things arent the way they are; they are the way that we are, to paraphrase famed French-born author Anas Nin. And if that is the case, then understanding the multiple perspectives of the organization is critical to truly understanding the organization itself. Without this understanding, how can you effectively lead change?
Check out our full conversation with Tariq Hassan on the From the Culture podcast, where we explore the inner workings of organizational culture with the leaders who lead them.
{"blockType":"mv-promo-block","data":{"imageDesktopUrl":"https:\/\/images.fastcompany.com\/image\/upload\/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit\/wp-cms-2\/2026\/01\/studio_16-9.jpg","imageMobileUrl":"https:\/\/images.fastcompany.com\/image\/upload\/f_webp,q_auto,c_fit\/wp-cms-2\/2026\/01\/studio_square_thumbnail.jpg","eyebrow":"","headline":"FROM THE CULTURE","dek":"FROM THE CULTURE is a podcast that explores the inner workings of organizational culture that enable companies to thrive, teams to win, and brands to succeed. If culture eats strategy for breakfast, then this is the most important conversation in business that you arent having.","subhed":"","description":"","ctaText":"Listen","ctaUrl":"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/playlist?list=PLvojPSJ6Iy0T4VojdtGsZ8Q4eAJ6mzr2h","theme":{"bg":"#2b2d30","text":"#ffffff","eyebrow":"#9aa2aa","subhed":"#ffffff","buttonBg":"#3b3f46","buttonHoverBg":"#3b3f46","buttonText":"#ffffff"},"imageDesktopId":91470870,"imageMobileId":91470866,"shareable":false,"slug":""}}
