AI is no longer just a cascade of algorithms trained on massive amounts of data. It has become a physical and infrastructural phenomenon, one whose future will be determined not by breakthroughs in benchmarks, but by the hard realities of power, geography, regulation, and the very nature of intelligence. Businesses that fail to see this will be blindsided.
Data centers were once the sterile backrooms of the internet: important, but invisible. Today, they are the beating heart of generative AI, the physical engines that make large language models (LLMs) possible. But what if these engines, and the models they power, are hitting limitations that cant be solved with more capital, more data centers, or more powerful chips?
In 2025 and into 2026, communities around the U.S. have been pushing back against new data center construction. In Springfield, Ohio; Loudoun County, Virginia and elsewhere, local residents and officials have balked at the idea of massive facilities drawing enormous amounts of electricity, disrupting neighborhoods, and straining already stretched electrical grids. These conflicts are not isolated. They are a signal, a structural friction point in the expansion of the AI economy.
At the same time, utilities are warning of a looming collision between AIs energy appetite and the cost of power infrastructure. Several states are considering higher utility rates for data-intensive operations, arguing that the massive energy consumption of AI data centers is reshaping the economics of electricity distribution, often at the expense of everyday consumers.
This friction between local resistance to data centers, the energy grids physical limits, and the political pressures on utilities is more than a planning dispute. It reveals a deeper truth: AIs most serious constraint is not algorithmic ingenuity, but physical reality.
When reality intrudes on the AI dream
For years, the dominant narrative in technology has been that more data and bigger models equal better intelligence. The logic has been seductive: scale up the training data, scale up compute power, and intelligence will emerge. But this logic assumes that three things are true:
Data can always be collected and processed at scale.
Data centers can be built wherever they are needed.
Language-based models can serve as proxies for understanding the world.
The first assumption is faltering. The second is meeting political and physical resistance. The third, that language alone can model reality, is quietly unraveling.
Large language models are trained on massive corpora of human text. But that text is not a transparent reflection of reality: It is a distillation of perceptions, biases, omissions, and misinterpretations filtered through the human use of language. Some of that is useful. Much of it is partial, anecdotal, or flat-out wrong. As these models grow, their training data becomes the lens through which they interpret the world. But that lens is inherently flawed.
This matters because language is not reality: It is a representation of individual and collective narratives. A language model learns the distribution of language, not the causal structure of events, not the physics of the world, not the sensory richness of lived experience. This limitation will come home to roost as AI is pushed into domains where contextual understanding of the world, not just text patterns, is essential for performance, safety, and real-world utility.
A structural crisis in the making
We are approaching a strange paradox: The very success of language-based AI is leading to its structural obsolescence.
As organizations invest billions in generative AI infrastructure, they are doing so on the assumption that bigger models, more parameters, and larger datasets will continue to yield better results. But that assumption is at odds with three emerging limits:
Energy and location constraints: As data centers face community resistance and grid limits, the expansion of AI compute capacity will slow, especially in regions without surplus power and strong planning systems.
Regulatory friction: States and countries will increasingly regulate electricity usage, data center emissions, and land use, placing new costs and hurdles on AI infrastructure.
Cognitive limitations of LLMs: Models that are trained only on text are hitting a ceiling on true understanding. The next real breakthroughs in AI will require models that learn from richer, multimodal interactions from real environments, sensory data and structured causal feedback, not just text corpora. Language alone will not unlock deeper machine understanding.
This is not a speculative concern. We see it in the inconsistencies of todays LLMs: confident in their errors, anchored in old data, and unable to reason about the physical or causal aspects of reality. These are not bugs: they are structural constraints.
Why this matters for business strategy
CEOs and leaders who continue to equate AI leadership with bigger models and more data center capacity are making a fundamental strategic error. The future of AI will not be defined by how much computing power you have, but by how well you integrate intelligence with the physical world.
Industries like robotics, autonomous vehicles, medical diagnosis, climate modeling, and industrial automation demand models that can reason about causality, sense environments, and learn from experience, not just from language patterns. The winners in these domains will be those who invest in hybrid systems that combine language with perception, embodiment, and grounded interaction.
Conclusion: reality bites back
The narrative that AI is an infinite frontier has been convenient for investors, journalists, and technologists alike. But like all powerful narratives, it eventually encounters the hard wall of reality. Data centers are running into political and energy limits. Language-only models are showing their boundaries. And the assumption that scale solves all problems is shaking at its foundations.
The next chapter of AI will not be about who builds the biggest model. It will be about who understands the world in all its physical, causal, and embodied complexity, and builds systems that are grounded in reality.
Innovation in AI will increasingly be measured not by the size of the data center or the number of parameters, but by how well machines perceive, interact with, and reason about the actual world.
In the world of social impact and sustainability, 2025s word of the year could have been headwinds. It became a euphemism for everything from political pressure and regulatory changes to economic uncertainty, AI disruption, and social upheaval.
But in many ways, headwinds is an understatement for what impact and sustainability leaders across the corporate and nonprofit sectors navigated in a year of budget cuts and evolving risk factors. For much of the past year, leaders across the corporate and nonprofit sectors have been recalibrating approaches to advancing their missions against these trends. In 2026, well start to see those new approaches in action.
Based on interviews with dozens of experts, here are five big shifts to pay attention to over the next year in social impact and sustainability.
1: Evolving the sustainability narrative
One of the most visible shifts to note is that social impact and sustainability are becoming much less, well, visible. For years, companies have been making bold commitments, setting lofty goals, and engaging in the kind of storytellingbut not always following through, a trend that finally led Merriam-Webster to add greenwashing to its dictionary in 2022.
2025 felt like a correction, as companies reacting to a changing landscape of risk and political attention ushered in a period of greenhushing, where companies were reluctant to talk about their sustainability initiatives. As Andrew Winston of Winston Eco-Strategies puts it, “The biggest issue in the U.S. is the very strong desire of leadership teams to keep their heads down and say nearly nothing about sustainability. The work seems to be mostly continuing, but it’s certainly not great for morale or moving at speed and scale if your bosses are telling you to hide out.”
Thats why 2026 is likely to bring another narrative correction that grounds sustainability storytelling in business performance and operational rigorwhich has always been where sustainability is heading. The best companies arent just making pledges, theyre building and executing solutions that scale, measure, and return value, says Dave Stangis at Apollo. Seeing capital, innovation, and outcomes align always gives me optimism.
2: Adopting a new leadership mindset
An organization laser-focused on delivering results also requires a laser focus from its leaders. As Alison Taylor of Ethical Systems notes, the rapid-fire disruption of 2025 made this focus hard to find: Many of sustainability’s core assumptions no longer apply, and there is a need for a reframe of the profession. The practitioners I talk to are struggling with terminology, legal risk, and threats to their roles. While it is true that much great work is going on behind the scenes, it is difficult for most leaders I speak to to maintain organizational momentum, simply because there is so much fire fighting to do.
2026 will bring new fires to fight, but the demand for results and focus will give rise to a new mindset for leaders. Kristen Titus of the Titus Group predicts that leaders will emerge from this period of uncertainty and paralysis with a renewed willingness to engage: Clients, customers, and employees are hungry for engagementand they’re craving moral leadership. Those that step forward with clarity and courage will help define the next chapter of impact and sustainability.
3: Aligning rapid response with long-term goals
One strategy that helps impact leaders maintain their focus involves finding ways to connect their communities immediate needs with long-term business strategy.
Uncertainty demands agility, as Laura Turner, VP and Head of Community Impact at TIAA points out: Most companies hold flexible funding that can be adapted for unexpected needs. When the government shutdown hit, TIAAs first-generation college student program pivoted quickly, redirecting funds to local food banks. That flexibility isn’t just nice to have anymore, it’s essential for navigating uncertainty.
For many organizations, balancing immediate and long-term needs also means AI-proofing their impact strategy. Royal Bank of Canada, for example, is leveraging business expertise and resources around AI adoption to support nonprofit partners in keeping pace with innovation. There is a broad consensus that AI and digital innovation can drive the biggest economic transformation in a generation. And yet, at this very same moment, the non-profit sector faces unprecedented strain and ongoing barriers to funding and technical training. Without intentional support, the sector risks falling behind. said Kara Gustafson, President of the RBC Foundation USA.
4: Putting well-being first
All of this uncertainty and disruption has taken a toll on professionals in this space in 2025. In 2026, well-being will become a core function of impact strategyboth as a response to workforce and community needs.
Haviland Sharvit, Executive Director of Susan Crown Exchange (Susan Crown Exchange and TIAA, above, are clients of mine), predicts that more companies and nonprofits will meet the moment with an impact strategy focused on youth well-being in the age of AI: Rapid advances in technology and AI offer powerful opportunities for learning and connection. Yet impact leaders face rising youth mental health strain, widening digital inequities, advancements that have outpaced youth protections, and the erosion of real human connection. Well see a shift toward promoting and safeguarding youth wellbeing in an AI-driven world, more attention on responsible tech, and greater investment in human connection.
5: Investing in community
Amid all of this disruption, we asked leaders what gives them hope, and a common refrain emerged: we find hope in each other.
Community is, and will continue to be, everything. In real and virtual rooms all over the countryand across impact networks like Trellis, UN Global Compact, NationSwell and many moreleaders spent 2025 reflecting, commiserating, and charting a new course forward.
The last prediction Ill offer is one of my own: impact networks and convening spaces will grow rapidly in 2026, as new communities of practice emerge and existing communities grow. With all of the growth and learning 2026 has in store, finding safe spaces for reflection, knowledge sharing, and collaboration is a top priority for impact leaders.
Severance is the hit sci-fi show about office workers who sever their consciousnessslipping into another mode the moment they arrive at the office, then forgetting everything about their 9-to-5 as soon as they leave. The concept was inspired by the creators own monotonous desk job before he found success in television. Part of the shows appeal lies in how familiar the premise feels: a dull, repetitive workday that people cant wait to escape.
In the real world, employees dont have a mental switch to flip, but theyve found subtler, and potentially more insidious, ways to disengage. The latest trend, dubbed task-masking, has taken over Instagram and TikTok. Its all about looking busy without actually being productive: charging around the office with a laptop, pretending to be on an urgent call, or typing furiously with no real purpose. According to recent research, more than a third of U.K. workers admit to faking productivity.
Task-masking doesnt just waste timeit slows career growth and hurts company performance. Employees miss out on meaningful progress and promotion opportunities. Leaders lose engagement and confidence in their teams.
In short, task-masking is a problem no leader can afford to ignore. Here are some strategies to stop it.
Be clear on the companys values
Task-masking isnt born of laziness or lack of ambitionits a fear-based response to productivity pressure and always-on work cultures. Research from Workhuman found that strict time-tracking exacerbates the problem: When workers strongly agree they are expected to respond immediately to Slack, Teams, or other instant messages, the rate of fake productivity shoots up to 51%.
To free employees from the sense that their time card matters most, leaders should clarify what the company truly values. Face time or hours logged at a desk shouldnt be measures of successmeaningful productivity should. What that looks like will vary by organization, but at Jotform, for example, it means advancing projects and meeting reasonable deadlines. It also includes less-measurable but equally valuable behaviors like showing curiosity, supporting teammates, and helping create a more engaged work culture.
Leaders should also be explicit about what doesnt count: busywork, unnecessary meetings that could be handled asynchronously, and burning the midnight oil just to give the impression of busyness and commitment.
Break down projects into more manageable tasks
As AI and automation boost efficiency and productivity, theyve fundamentally transformed workloads. In many ways, thats a positive change. Employees can devote more time to meaningful, higher-impact work. For example, you can spend more time on strategizing and creative writing, and fewer hours sifting through your inbox and searching through meeting notes. But it also brings a challenge: When technology accelerates what you can accomplish in a day, leaders expectations often rise in tandem. The slope to burnout becomes slippery.
One of the best antidotes to that pressure, especially when facing large, intimidating projects that can leave employees feeling paralyzed or faking productivity, is to break them into smaller tasks. For starters, this helps people identify steps that can be automated, eliminated, or delegated. It also makes progress more tangible. Ticking off one item at a time, with restorative breaks in between, keeps momentum steady.
When a daunting to-do list is broken down into a sequence of manageable tasks, employees can work efficiently and stay on track toward deadlines without burning out.
Make psychological safety a priority
If task-masking is rooted in fear, a quick fix wont eliminate it. Economic downturns, global pandemics, and rapid technological change have all contributed to a heightened sense of workplace anxiety, especially among the younger generations. More than one-third (37%) of Gen Z workers fear losing their jobsmore than any other generationaccording to research from Edelmans Gen Z Lab. Creating an environment where psychological safety is a priority can help assuage career-related fears and the pressure to appear productive all the time. When employees feel safe admitting theyre stuck or uncertain, theyre less likely to mask their struggles with performative busyness.
At Jotform, we have multiple channels where employees can voice their concerns, ranging from all-hands meetings and dedicated chat threads to a general management open-door policy. I make a point to share the challenges Im facing, too, in hopes that my candor will encourage others to speak openly about their own doubts and setbacks.
Ultimately, leaders must be explicit about the resources available to support employees and model the transparency they want to see. A bit of vulnerability from the top can help promote psychological safety throughout an organization. Employees shouldnt fear work so much that they want to escape itthrough severance or through task-masking.
While traveling to Riyadh for the Fortune Global Forum, FII9, and the Global Health Exhibition, I witnessed something that should be a wake-up call for health systems everywhere. Saudi Arabia is already operating the kind of connected, AI-enabled healthcare infrastructure many countries are still debating how to build. At FII9, the conversation was unmistakable. Global innovation momentum is shifting toward the Middle East, and nowhere more than Saudi Arabia, where national digital platforms like Sehhaty already give millions of residents unified access to their health data. At the Global Health Exhibition, I saw population-level analytics, AI-powered diagnostics, multiomic initiatives, and interoperable infrastructure deployed at a speed and scale that would take years in other countries. It made something clear: Healthcare does not have a data problem. We have a connection problem.
LIFESTYLE DRIVES OUTCOMES, BUT REMAINS CLINICALLY INVISIBLE
Studies show that lifestyle and environmental factors account for more than 80% of health outcomes. A healthy lifestyle can prevent the vast majority of chronic diseases, including heart disease and diabetes. And yet, the data that reflects how people actually live, how they eat, move, sleep, and manage stress, remains largely absent from clinical care.
In the United States, for example, healthcare is not suffering from a data shortage. Its drowning in data. Every day, people generate powerful information through wearables, continuous glucose monitors, fitness and sleep apps, and smart rings. As of 2023, nearly one in three Americans use a wearable to track their health, according to a Health Information National Trends Survey. These tools capture meaningful lifestyle signals that directly affect clinical outcomes. Yet almost none of this data reaches the exam room. It remains siloed on consumer platforms, invisible to clinicians, and unusable in medical decision making.
This disconnect has consequences. Preventive opportunities are missed. Chronic conditions go unmanaged. Healthcare remains reactive instead of proactive. Clinicians rely on structured snapshots like lab results and prescriptions, important, but incomplete, because they capture what happens in the clinic rather than daily life.
AI AS THE BRIDGE BETWEEN LIFESTYLE DATA AND CLINICAL CARE
Its not that clinicians are uninterested in wearable data. Many are eager. Remote patient monitoring has grown rapidly, with a 1,300% increase in related procedures between 2019 and 2022. However, the friction points are real. Data security is a concern. Device accuracy varies. Practices often lack the IT infrastructure to onboard new tools, train staff, and integrate multiple data streams. Most importantly, clinicians are overwhelmed. More raw data is not the solution.
This is why healthcare systems need a bridge that makes lifestyle data usable, reliable, and safe in clinical settings. That bridge is clinical-grade AI. When lifestyle and longitudinal behavioral datasets are used at inference time via retrieval, AIs outputs are grounded in real-world signals rather than abstract reasoning alone, distilling only the most relevant insights for the point of care. The goal is not another dashboard, but meaningful signals embedded within existing workflows that reduce burden rather than increase it. With the right tools, AI also empowers patients. Personalized, real-time guidance rooted in their own physiology helps them understand their data, make better decisions, and stay aligned with their care plan.
A NATIONAL DIGITAL HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE
Countries such as Saudi Arabia are demonstrating what happens when clinical and systems-level data come together. The unified national health platform Sehhaty serves as an access point for millions of residents and offers integrated services far beyond scheduling. These include secure medical records, online prescriptions, lab results, vaccination history, teleconsultations, and remote monitoring. The app reportedly contains 31 million unified health files, representing nearly 88% of the population, and 140 million online prescriptions.
At the center of this transformation is the Seha Virtual Hospital, which delivers remote specialist care across 224 hospitals and dozens of specialties, including critical-care consults and AI-driven diagnostics. Investments in genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and advanced AI at institutions such as King Faisal Specialist Hospital rival those of some of the best programs in the United States. The result is a coordinated model of nationwide digital health integration, something long envisioned but not yet achieved.
TO BUILD THE FUTURE OF HEALTH, CONNECT THE DOTS
The United States has the devices and data, but has long lacked the infrastructure and incentives to connect them meaningfully. That is beginning to shift. Recent CMS initiatives signal recognition that prevention, lifestyle data, and technology-enabled care must play a larger role in how health outcomes are measured and reimbursed. Initiatives such as MAHA ELEVATE and the CMS ACCESS Model reflect a growing shift toward prevention-first, lifestyle-driven care. MAHA ELEVATE supports Medicare pilot programs that test whether whole-person, lifestyle-based care can improve health outcomes and lower costs, while ACCESS helps bring these approaches to scale through new care delivery and outcome-based payment models. In parallel, CMS Aligned Networks is focusing on improving interoperability and coordination across the healthcare ecosystem, creating standards and incentives that allow data to move safely between patients, providers, and care teams. The opportunity is to ensure that lifestyle data are treated as essential clinical information and that AI translates complexity into actionable insight at the point of care.
The most valuable health data we possess is already being captured on our wrists, in our pockets, and throughout our daily routines. The challenge is no longer collection. Its connection. To close the gap, we must treat lifestyle data as essential clinical information and not a consumer novelty. Interoperable systems must allow this information to move securely to the right stakeholders, with AI surfacing timely, relevant signals that support decision making without adding friction for clinicians or patients.
Only then can healthcare move from fragmented snapshots to continuous understanding, from episodic and reactive care to a model that anticipates risk, promotes healthy behaviors, and supports the whole person. The future of healthcare is already taking shape in places such as Riyadh, where vision, infrastructure, and execution are aligned. Other countres, including the United States, can get there too, but only if we connect the dots.
Noosheen Hashemi is founder and CEO of January AI.
Scott Adams, the creator of the uber-popular and satirical comic strip Dilbert, has died. He passed away on January 13, after announcing his diagnosis of metastatic prostate cancer last spring. He was 68.
On Tuesday morning, the cartoonists former wife, Shelly Miles, shared the news of his death during a livestream on X. Miles read from a statement that Adams had prepared himself for the occasion.
I had an amazing life, the statement said. I gave it everything I had. If you got any benefits from my work, I’m asking you to pay it forward as best you can. That is the legacy I want. Be useful. And please know I loved you all to the very end.
Dilbert was created in 1989, and it broke new ground, offering a refreshing and pointed critique of white-collar work life. It became known for its ever-relatable digs about the drudgery of office culture and insufferable bosses, long preceding relatable movies and TV shows like Office Space and The Office, which featured similar dismal (and hilarious) views of work culture years later.In its heyday, the comic strip appeared in over 2,000 newspapers worldwide, with an estimated readership of more than 150 million. Adams’s strip amassed such popularity that he was named the 1997 recipient of the National Cartoonist Society’s Reuben Award. That same year, Dilbert (the character) became the first fictional person to make Time magazine’s list of the most influential Americans.However, while Dilbert became one of the most popular cartoons of all time, Adams battled deep controversy in his later years. In 2023, hundreds of newspapers dropped the classic comic after Adams made racist comments on his podcast, saying that it no longer makes any sense as a white citizen of America to try to help Black citizens anymore. He also described Black people as a “hate group.”Adams said his statements were taken out of context. Still, the incident, and its aftermath, effectively ended Dilbert‘s wide syndication in newspapers. Other comics weighed in, too. “He’s not being canceled. He’s experiencing the consequences of expressing his views,” Bill Holbrook, creator of the strip On the Fastrack, told The Associated Press at the time. “I am in full support of him saying anything he wants to, but then he has to own the consequences of saying them.”Regardless of Adamss troubling personal views and complicated legacy, Dilbert has played a large role in the conversation around work life. Experts say that his cartoons’ outspoken critiques of bosses and work life, which were perhaps ahead of their time, can’t be rolled back.
Phil Lohmeyer, a cartoonist, animator, and middle school design teacher from Connecticut, tells Fast Company that hes confident the kind of office critiques made popular by Dilbert will live on because they are so universal. Dilbert wasn’t as much about the characters, even though the characters themselves became famous. It was more about the annoyance of middle management, he notes.
Lohmeyer says that the idea truly resonated with office workers, who posted the comics in their cubicles in the 90s, or emailed them to coworkers. While younger generations might not be well-versed in Dilbert, the teacher still sees the ideas show up in his middle school classroom. The kids make fun of the rules, schedules, and more, he says. They use comic strip humor to question the system, kind of how Adams was doing years ago.
While so much has changed in offices and classrooms alike, Lohmeyer says that feeling seen in your role will forever be relevant. Adams turned work issues into cartoon gags, making the previously invisible finally visible.
Iranian demonstrators’ ability to get details of bloody nationwide protests out to the world has been given a strong boost, with SpaceX’s Starlink satellite internet service dropping its fees to allow more people to circumvent the Tehran government’s strongest attempt ever to prevent information from spilling outside its borders, activists said Wednesday.
The move by the American aerospace company run by Elon Musk follows the complete shutdown of telecommunications and internet access to Iran’s 85 million people on Jan. 8, as protests expanded over the Islamic Republic’s faltering economy and the collapse of its currency.
SpaceX has not officially announced the decision and did not respond to a request for comment, but activists told The Associated Press that Starlink has been available for free to anyone in Iran with the receivers since Tuesday.
Starlink has been crucial, said Mehdi Yahyanejad, an Iranian whose nonprofit Net Freedom Pioneers has helped smuggle units into Iran, pointing to video that emerged Sunday showing rows of bodies at a forensic medical center near Tehran.
That showed a few hundred bodies on the ground, that came out because of Starlink,” he said in an interview from Los Angeles. “I think that those videos from the center pretty much changed everyone’s understanding of what’s happening because they saw it with their own eyes.
Since the outbreak of demonstrations Dec. 28, the death toll has risen to more than 2,500 people, primarily protesters but also security personnel, according to the U.S.-based Human Rights Activists News Agency.
Starlink is banned in Iran by telecommunication regulations, as the country never authorized the importation, sale, or use of the devices. Activists fear they could be accused of helping the U.S. or Israel by using Starlink and charged with espionage, which can carry the death penalty.
Cat-and-mouse as authorities hunt for Starlink devices
The first units were smuggled into Iran in 2022 during protests over the country’s mandatory headscarf law, after Musk got the Biden administration to exempt the Starlink service from Iran sanctions.
Since then, more than 50,000 units are estimated to have been sneaked in, with people going to great lengths to conceal them, using virtual private networks while on the system to hide IP addresses and taking other precautions, said Ahmad Ahmadian, the executive director of Holistic Resilience, a Los Angeles-based organization that was responsible for getting some of the first Starlink units into Iran.
Starlink is a global internet network that relies on some 10,000 satellites orbiting Earth. Subscribers need to have equipment, including an antenna that requires a line of sight to the satellite, so must be deployed in the open, where it could be spotted by authorities. Many Iranians disguise them as solar panels, Ahmadian said.
After efforts to shut down communications during the 12-day war with Israel in June proved to be not terribly effective, Iranian security services have taken more extreme tactics now to jam Starlink’s radio signals and GPS systems, Ahmadian said in a phone interview. After Holistic Resilience passed on reports to SpaceX, Ahmadian said, the company pushed a firmware update that helped circumvent the new countermeasures.
Security services also rely on informers to tell them who might be using Starlink, and search internet and social media traffic for signs it has been used. There have been reports they have raided apartments with satellite dishes.
There has always been a cat-and-mouse game, said Ahmadian, who fled Iran in 2012 after serving time in prison for student activism. The government is using every tool in its toolbox.
Still, Ahmadian noted that the government jamming attempts had only been effective in certain urban areas, suggesting that security services lack the resources to block Starlink more broadly.
A free Starlink could increase the flow of information out of Iran
Iran did begin to allow people to call out internationally on Tuesday via mobile phones, but calls from outside the country into Iran remain blocked.
Compared to protests in 2019, when lesser measures by the government were able to effectively stifle information reaching the rest of the world for more than a week, Ahmadian said the proliferation of Starlink has made it impossible to prevent communications. He said the flow could increase now that the service has been made free.
This time around they really shut it down, even fixed landlines were not working, he said. But despite this, the information was coming out, and it also shows how distributed this community of Starlink users is in the country.
Musk has made Starlink free for use during several natural disasters, and Ukraine has relied heavily on the service since Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. It was initially funded by SpaceX and later through an American government contract.
Musk had raised concerns over the power of such a system being in the hands of one person, after he refused to extend Ukraine’s Starlink coverage to support a planned Ukrainian counterattack in Russian-occupied Crimea.
As a proponent of Starlink for Iran, Ahmadian said the Crimea decision was a wake-up call for him, but that he couldn’t see any reason why Musk might be inclined to act similarly in Iran.
Looking at the political Elon, I think he would have more interest … in a free Iran as a new market, he said.
Julia Voo, who heads the International Institute for Strategic Studies’ Cyber Power and Future Conflict Program in Singapore, said there is a risk in becoming reliant on one company as a lifeline, as it creates a single point of failure, though currently there are no comparable alternatives.
China has been exploring ways to hunt and destroy Starlink satellites, and Voo said the more effective Starlink proves itself at penetrating government-mandated terrestrial blackouts, the more states will be observing.
It’s just going to result in more efforts to broaden controls over various ways of communication, for those in Iran and everywhere else watching, she said.
David Rising, Associated Press
Associated Press writers Jon Gambrell and Melanie Lidman contributed to this report.
As Americans struggle with an affordability crisishigh inflation and an even higher cost of living, especially when it comes to housingBilt is launching three new, low interest credit cards with rates capped at 10% on new purchases for the first yearincluding a premium card offering with a $495 annual fee.
The Bilt Card 2.0 series launches next month on February 7. “Between now and January 30, existing cardholders will be able to seamlessly transition and pre-order a new Bilt Card in their Bilt account or online,” according to a statement on the company’s website.
There is clearly a need for affordability at this point in time more than ever, Bilt chief executive officer Ankur Jain said in an interview with Bloomberg. It felt like we should be the brand to do this.
The move follows President Donald Trump’s call last Friday for a one year, 10% limit on credit card interest rates, saying he supported the Credit Card Competition Act, a bill that if passed by Congress, could provide more oversight on credit card companies.
Here’s what to know.
What are the advantages of Bilt cards?
Bilt cards offer mortgage and rent payments rewards, unlike many credit cards that focus on, say, travel or merchandise points.
What this means is Bilt customers earn rewards just for paying their rent and mortgage bills.
However, the rewards are not solely limited to that. Customers also earn points on purchases at any one of Bilt’s 45,000 partners, including everything from Walgreens to Lyft to your local gym, according to the New York Times.
What are the three new Bilt 2.0 cards?
There are three new Bilt Card 2.0 credit cardsincluding a premium card offering with a $495 annual fee, called the Bilt Palladium card.
All three cards earn 4% back in Bilt cash on spending, and allow customers to pay their rent and mortgage with no transaction fees.
Here’s a breakdown of the three cards below:
BILT BLUE CARD
A no-annual fee card with flexible rewards
$0 annual fee
BILT OBSIDIAN CARD
Card offers 3X points on dining or groceries, and offers Bilt Travel Hotel credits
$95 annual fee
BILT PALLADIUM CARD
Premium card with high-value rewards and elevated benefits like annual Bilt Cash, Bilt Travel Hotel credits, and Priority Pass
$495 annual fee
If youre sick of paying for subscription services, Tesla has some bad news for you.
The EV maker announced Wednesday that going forward, its Full Self-Driving (Supervised) software will only be available as a monthly subscription not a one-time payment. Tesla CEO Elon Musk broke the news on X, the social media platform he owns, noting that the shift will happen on February 14. FSD will only be available as a monthly subscription thereafter, Musk wrote, offering no details about how that change would affect the softwares pricing.
While the price of access to Full Self-Driving (FSD) mode has fluctuated over time, the current one-time purchase price for the software is $8,000 or $99 paid as a monthly subscription. Tesla once charged as much as $15,000 for the technology, which promises to intelligently and accurately complete driving maneuvers for you, including steering, making lane changes and parking. The feature requires active driver supervision and doesnt make the vehicle autonomous, Tesla disclaims on the Full Self-Driving website.
Teslas decision to flip to a subscription model for its self-driving software may not land well with some Tesla buyers, but its not a total surprise. In November, Teslas shareholders approved an eye-watering pay package for Musk that consolidates even more power at the company with the mercurial billionaire with the promise of a payout that could be worth $1 trillion. One of the pay package milestones Musk must hit to unlock the biggest executive payout in history? Boosting Teslas Full Self-Driving software to 10 million monthly active subscriptions before 2035.
Much of Teslas future revolves around the future of its self-driving tech, but Musk has broken many promises about the software along the way. In California, the company is facing legal woes over deceptive marketing practices that suggested Teslas technology was autonomous, even as it required close supervision from a human driver at the wheel hence the softwares current nomenclature: Full Self-Driving (Supervised). Musk has also asserted that Teslas vehicles would be appreciating assets thanks to the self-driving software a claim not borne out by Teslas recent tanking used vehicle prices.
Teslas competition heats up
Depending on where you look, Teslas competition is either out ahead or catching up fast. Earlier this month, Chinese company BYD bumped Tesla from its top slot as the worlds bestselling electric vehicle maker. Tesla reported that it delivered 1.64 million EVs last year, a 9% dip from the year prior. In the last quarter of 2025, Tesla missed sales expectations, tallying 418,227 sales a decline connected to Trumps decision to kill the hefty U.S. tax credits designed to give Americans a break on qualifying EVs.
Tesla, like Musk, has a lot of irons in the fire. The company is also investing aggressively into the robotaxi business, even as its self-driving tech faces scrutiny from federal regulators for reckless behavior. Tesla has a lot of catching up to do on that count, with Alphabets Waymo leading the push into autonomous taxi service across major U.S. cities like Austin, Los Angeles and San Francisco.
Teslas own robotaxi experiment has yet to impress, based on Fast Companys own firsthand experience. Unlike Waymos own properly self-driving taxis, Teslas robotaxis still come with a human supervisor an awkward compromise and a long way from Musks lofty promises of a fully autonomous near-future.
Apple was the last champion of the pay once, own forever crowd, a safe harbor for some of the creatives fleeing Adobes monthly ransom. Now it has introduced Creator Studio, its own subscription-based offering that bundles together tools including Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, Pixelmator Pro, Motion, Compressor, and MainStage (as well as newly AI-infused productivity apps like Pages and Numbers).
There are already two major creative suits out there: Adobe Creative Cloud and Canva. The former is clearly oriented to the high end, enterprise, and prosumer spaces with heavyweight apps like Photoshop, Premiere, and Illustrator. The latter focuses on individual, small companies, and enterprises, with a strong productivity and template-based creative suite that has recently been expanded with free professional creative tools.
With Creator Studio, however, Apple has put a bunch of tools into a brown paper bag of confusion: The assortment is too complex for the Canva crowd, yet underpowered compared to the Adobe suite.
[Image: Apple]
Stiff competition
Adobe CC is the true bundle for creators. It covers every industry: design, publishing, motion design, video, audio, and even office productivity via Acrobat. For $70 per monthno perpetual, one-time-payment licenses available anymoreyou get all you need, plus Adobe’s AI, Firefly. In fact, for most people is overkill. Not many people do even a third of what Adobe CC covers. This is why so many people are fed up with their subscription model (worth noting: it still has about 41 million paying users).
Canva is an all-in-one bundle for everyday creators: a browser-first suite that makes it easy to design social posts, presentations, simple videos, print materials, and brand kits without needing pro expertise. Its built around a cloud account with a big free tier, plus paid plans ($15/month for individuals and $10/month per user for the teams version) that include AI tools. For a while, Canva was “enough” for 90% of what people make, and anything heavierlike advanced photo compositing, full motion graphics pipelines, high-end audiousually lived elsewhere. Now, however, they added free perpetual licenses for the Affinity suite, which competes with Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign.
Both of them are coherent in their focus and power in their own way. That’s not really something you can say about Apple’s new $13 monthly subscription package. Apple is asking us to pay for a hodgepodge of apps where the flagship video editor, Final Cut Pro (FCP), may not even be the runner-up anymore. Outside of very high-end video editingstill dominated by AvidAdobe Premiere Pro sits comfortably at the top of the market share charts with an estimated 30 million users in 2024. I say estimated because Adobe hasnt released official numbers. Like Apple, which last claimed Final Cut Pro had 2.5 million users in 2018. A lot has changed since that year and many video editors now argue that Blackmagic Design’s Resolve is the best video editor (and it is free).
[Image: Apple]
Another main plate in the Creator Studio is the newly acquired Pixelmator Pro, which Apple is seemingly positioning as its Photoshop killer. If you want a potential Adobe killer, you look at Affinity. Now owned by Canva, the Affinity suite (Photo, Designer, Publisher) is a genuine triple-threat that rivals Photoshop, Illustrator, and InDesign with a free (again, there are free options to most of the Apple and Adobe apps) price tag.
[Image: Apple]
Affinity reportedly added 1 million users in a single week. Pixelmator Pro just cant compete with that. Its a lovely app, but pretending it replaces Adobes pro design tools or Affinity is like saying go-kart can replace a Formula 1 car because they all have wheels. (By the way, if you own Pixelmator Pro, you will be forced to subscribe to Creator Studio because Apple says that your license will not receive any updates. A hint of whats to come.)
[Image: Apple]
The AI card doesnt cut it
To compensate, Apple is dangling “exclusive intelligent features” as the primary reason to subscribe, locking automated toolslike Logic Pros new session players and Final Cuts magnetic maskbehind the paywall. Its a weak card to play, especially when you consider how far behind Apple has fallen in the AI races. Are people going to value access to these AI tools enough to justify Creator Studios $13 monthly payment? Time will tell.
And what in the world are Pages, Numbers, and Keynote doing here? These productivity apps were already free and were never pro, no matter how many AI features you add to them. Why would a creative person pay for a free word processor that hasnt meaningfully evolved in years? Or a spreadsheet that is a joke compared to Excel? And sure, Keynote is slick, but have you heard about Canva? Or Google Slides for that matter?
[Image: Apple]
Who is creator studio actually studio for?
So who is Creator Studio actually for? The only logical customer I can think of is someone like a YouTuberyour typical solo creator who edits videos, can cook something in Logic Pro, and needs to slap together a thumbnail in Pixelmator. For them, paying $129 a year is a steal compared to Adobes $600. But thats a narrow slice of the $56-billion creator economy Apple claims to target.
Musicians using Logic Pro (perhaps the only Creator Studio tool that still has the crown in its respective industry) probably don’t need a video editor. Video editors using Final Cut don’t need a spreadsheet app. And so on.
Judging by this thread on Reddit or this one in an Apple user forum, people seem to agree that this is a bad movepeople are tired of subscriptions. Even fan publications like Apple Insider have slammed the move. Apple users fear that eventually the company will kill the one-time-only licenses and force everyone into the subscription model. While Apple hasnt replied yet to questions about the potential future end of licenses yet (we will update the article when/if they do) its the shareholder-friendly thing to do.
“I see a bunch of Americans drinking hot water with lemon and honey, eating congee, drinking hot pot, drinking more soup, eating Chinese vegetables,” one Chinese creator, Emma Peng, recently shared in a TikTok, currently with over 3 million views. “I just want to say that my culture can be your culture. Youre doing really good hydrating yourself. Im proud of you.”
The becoming Chinese trend is currently everywhere on the app, and while the name might give pause, its mostly about adopting lifestyle habits rooted in traditional Chinese medicine.
In the past month or so, Chinese creators have gone viral for espousing the benefits of common Chinese cultural practices,like drinking hot water, wearing house slippers, and trading cold salads and yogurt for hot congee and boiled apples during the colder months. The comment section, meanwhile, is full of Americans diligently taking notes.
Another creator at the forefront of the trend is Chinese American TikToker Sherry Xiiruii. In one viral clip, with 1.4 million views, she announces: Tomorrow, youre turning Chinese. I know it sounds intimidating, but theres no point fighting it now you are the chosen one.
Usually, when a trend involves adopting elements from, or becoming, another culture, it is met with cries of cultural appropriation. Some users have understandably expressed mixed feelings about the cultural practices they were once made fun of for now being repackaged and sold as a viral trend.
However, in this case the response from Chinese creators is is overwhelmingly positive. Its perhaps unsurprising a trend rooted in self-improvement has gained traction in the first month of the New year, especially given many of the wellness tips and hacks that go viral online have existed for millennia in Ancient Eastern medicine. As one TikTok creator said: All I have to say is what took yall this long to catch on?
Still, the appetite for Chinese culture is not limited to TikToks wellness algorithm. “You met me at a very chinese time in my life,” a viral X post from April 2025 reads, a nod to Fight Clubs iconic one-liner. Meanwhile, posts about chinesemaxxingwhich amounts to smoking cigarettes crouched low to the ground and donning toggle jacketsstarted cropping up online throughout 2025.
As producer Minh Tran wrote in a recent Substack post titled My Year of Rest and Chinesemaxxing: Part of the reason these videos dont feel like outright mockery is because theres some kernel of truth and desire in the cosplay. Though things have always been made in China, we are increasingly making ourselves in the image of the Chinese.
Here, he notes the Labubu mania of 2025. The collectible plush toys, made by Chinese toymaker Pop Mart, were in many ways the standout trend of the year, tripling the companys profits and sparking a buying frenzy that spanned the globe. Or recall when for a brief momentit looked like the Chinese social media platform Rednote would replace TikTok, as users migrated from the platform and bid goodbye to their personal Chinese spy ahead of the potential ban (that never came) over national security concerns.
Across tech and other industries, China is the U.S.s closest competitor and, in many ways, its greatest challenger. At a time where America is more divided than ever, and the country’s politics a source of national embarrassment for many, people are looking beyond the countrys borders for alternative ways of living.
Given the current geopolitical context, the becoming Chinese trend is perhaps about more than sipping hot tea and house slippers. As Tran writes: The threat of the Chinese Century looms over us all.
