 |
|
|
|||||
Much like its peers in the tech industry, Oracle is pouring money into AI infrastructure. The tech giant inked a lucrative $300 billion deal with OpenAI last year to build out AI data centers, in a bid to compete with companies like Amazon and Microsoft. But the deal requires Oracle to spend a significant amount of money upfronta move that is now pushing the company to cull its workforce. According to recent reports, Oracle is planning major layoffs that would reportedly affect thousands of jobs. The company had already earmarked about $1.6 billion for restructuring costs this yearlargely due to employee severance costsindicating there would be job cuts. As of February, that sum has now increased by $500 million, bringing overall restructuring costs to $2.1 billion. Bloomberg has reported that the layoffs would impact many parts of the business and could take effect this month; some of the job losses will also target roles that AI is rendering less essential. The forthcoming job cuts were framed as broader than Oracles usual rolling approach to layoffs; the company typically avoids large-scale layoffs that merit a public announcement. Oracle would also effectively freeze hiring in its cloud division, according to Bloomberg. Oracle joins a growing list of companies that are trimming headcount due to AIbut as with many other employers, theres limited evidence that the company is replacing workers with AI en masse. Instead, these layoffs largely seem to be driven by Oracles extensive investments in AI, which could take years to pay off. Oracle is currently raising $50 billion in debt and equity to finance its AI aspirations, and analysts have said the company will likely continue losing money on this venture until 2030. Last month, Jack Dorsey announced major layoffs at his fintech company Block, which drew widespread consternation. Dorsey framed those job losses, which affected 40% of the companys workforce, as the direct result of efficiency gains from AI. But many companies have also used AI as a convenient explanation for more pedestrian cost-cutting measures, even as economists have argued that AI is not yet displacing workers on a large scale. Some companies have cited AI rather than blaming issues like immigration policy and tariffs, which might not be as politically expedient or appealing to shareholders. Others, like Oracle, are slashing jobs over AIbut not necessarily because theyre outright using AI to replace workers. Microsoft, too, has made sweeping investments in AI, spending tens of billions of dollars on data centers while laying off over 15,000 in 2025. The layoffs at companies like Microsoft and Amazon have also targeted middle managers, the sorts of jobs that cant exactly be replaced by AI at the moment. The AI boom has also helped cement an era of forever layoffs, in which even big tech jobs no longer hold the promise of stability. Since the pandemic, tech employers have become especially reliant on layoffsa trend that has been accelerated with the rise of AI. Whether or not workers are getting explicitly displaced or ousted due to automation, few jobs are now safe if companies value AI over human capital.
Category:
E-Commerce
James Beard Award-winning chef René Redzepi, who co-founded the iconic, Michelin Starred Noma restaurant in Copenhagen, announced his resignation on Wednesday. The announcement comes following years of allegations of abuse, assault, and the creation of a toxic work environment at the restaurant which is one of the world’s most famous, influential and acclaimed dining spots. Back in 2017, at the height of the #MeToo movement, entire industries were upended with a long-overdue, global reckoning that held countless high-profile men accountable for past behavior of abuse, leading to widespread cultural and workplace change. The chauvinistic toxicity of the restaurant industry was especially highlighted, with big names like Mario Batali, Todd English, John Besh and many others hit with abuse allegations that triggered restaurant closures and public resignations. Now, nearly a decade later, the latest incident with Redzepi underscores just how far the workforce, and the restaurant world in particular, may still have to go to create safe workspaces that operate at the most elite levels in their industriesand to hold perpetrators accountable. Jessica Kriegel, Chief Strategy Officer at workplace consultancy firm Culture Partners, tells Fast Company that restaurants are “pressure cookers,” but asserts that shouldn’t excuse abusein restaurants, or any other workplace led by highly successful leaders highly visible in their field. Dismantling the mythology of the brilliant tyrant While abuse claims followed Redzepi for years, the heat on the chef reached a boiling point after an explosive New York Times report was published earlier this month. The piece detailed Redzepi’s alleged abuse from 2009 to 2017, with reports of a kitchen being run by “unpaid interns” working 16-hour shifts, a habit of “public shaming,” and an explosive episode that involved punching an employee. Employees said that kind of abuse was common: Going to work felt like going to war, former employee Alessia, who didn’t want her surname to be published in the piece, told the outlet. You had to force yourself to be strong, to show no fear. The bombshell NYT report came just ahead of a new Noma pop-up’s opening in Los Angeles. When the pop-up opened on March 11, a crowd of protesters were outside. Key sponsors like American Express, Resy and Blackbird had pulled their funding the day before. The chef’s resignation soon followed. I have worked to be a better leader and Noma has taken big steps to transform the culture over many years, Redzepi wrote on Instagram following the opening. I recognize these changes do not repair the past. An apology is not enough; I take responsibility for my own actions. In a post just days earlier, Redzepi also acknowledged his abusive behavior, which he admitted involved physical acts of aggression, and said he was simply “not able to handle the pressure.” Fast Company has reached out to Noma for comment. While workplace culture has undeniably changed in recent years, as individuals (especially women) have spoken out more frequently about workplace harassment and abuse thanks to the #MeToo movement, challenges still exist. Working in an office and a restaurant are drastically different experiences, for examplethe latter tends to be an extraordinarily fast-paced environment that can lend itself to toxic conditions. Kriegel says that more recent representation on shows like The Bear, coupled with brave employee voices, could be helping to bring about some long-awaited change within the industry. The Emmy-winning Hulu hit features toxic bosses at world-class restaurants, but it also shows the impactincluding traumato employees. “Workers are speaking up, and audiences are starting to see the human cost behind the mythology of the ‘brilliant tyrant,'” Kriegel explains. “Shows like The Bear are great because they dont just glorify the chaos of the kitchen. They show what it does to people.” According to a 2021 survey of 4,700 restaurant workers from Black Box Intelligence, 49% of restaurant workers experience emotional abuse from managers, and 15% reported being sexually harassed by managers or coworkers. (Thats not even including abuse from customers: 62% of respondents said they receive emotional abuse or disrespect from customers, and another 15% are sexually harassed by them.)Kriegel says that the narrative is definitely beginning to shift, even when it comes to the restaurant industry. “The world is moving away from tolerating abusive leadership simply because someone is talented,” Kriegel explains. If Redzepi’s resignation is any indication, that may be true.
Category:
E-Commerce
With its many extraterrestrial guest stars, The X-Files was always meant to be a spooky show. One of its earliest episodes, however, is now eerie in a way its creators likely never intended. In Ghost in the Machine, a first-season standout that originally aired in 1993, a sentient, corporate-created AI turns deadly when it perceives a threat to its existence. That description may rightly sound near-identical to any number of previous killer-computer plotlines2001: A Space Odyssey being the most obvious touchstone, along with Terminator 2, which had come out just two years earlier. What sets this X-Files episode apart from other entries in the lethally sentient AI canon is that it pits a safety-minded tech CEO against a belligerent U.S. Department of Defense, which is desperate to use this companys AI in guardrail-free combat operations. Sound familiar? A ghost in the machine Across its nine original seasons, two feature films, and a reboot, The X-Files cultivated an overarching mythology. The shows creators wisely took frequent off-roading adventures, though, with standalone Monster of the Week episodes that helped keep fans on their toes. Ghost in the Machine is one such excursion, only the monster in this case turned out to be AI. The show begins with the CEO of too-cutely named software company Eurisko (you risk-o?) writing a memo about shutting down the Central Operating System AI that runs corporate HQ. Unfortunately, because the AI is surveilling the entire building, it picks up on this plan and chooses instead to shut down with extreme prejudice the CEO himselfvia electrocution. Enter FBI special agents Fox Spooky Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson). Their investigation quickly leads them to Euriskos founder, Brad Wilczek, who is initially willing to take the fall for his CEOs murder. By digging a bit deeper, though, Mulder discovers that not only is Euriskos AI the true culprit, the Department of Defense has been trying to get its hands on that AI for years, only to be snubbed each time by Wilczek. (It’s a learning machine, one character says. A computer that actually thinks. And it’s become something of a holy grail for our more acquisitive colleagues in the Department of Defense.) Eventually, Mulder and Scully work with Wilczek to fry the AI, much to the chagrin of a Defense Department mole who has been working at Eurisko the whole time. File closed! Back in 1993, Ghost in the Machine fit snugly into the paranoid truth is out there ethos of a sci-fi show about alien conspiracies. Now, its not closer to the realm of documentary. Although the show would return to the subject of AI again 25 years later in one of the reboot episodes2018s Rm9sbG93ZXJz, a more Black Mirror-y spin on fearing ones smartphoneits the older and admittedly cheesier outing that is far more relevant in 2026. Its most glaring point of prescience, of course, is that it appears to have predicted with spooky accuracy the recent battle between the U.S. government and AI heavyweight Anthropicnot to mention the governments use of AI in its current war with Iran. Our more acquisitive colleagues in the Department of Defense Unlike his fictional counterpart in The X-Files, Anthropic cofounder Dario Amodei was very much interested in lending his AI model to Uncle Sam. Last July, Anthropic signed a $200 million contract with the U.S. Department of Defense to provide its Claude model for use in classified and operational work. It was only when negotiations began over what such work might actually entail that irreconcilable differences emerged. As the back-and-forth dragged on through late 2025 and into this January, the major sticking points involved Anthropics demand of usage restrictions on Claudemainly, that it shouldnt be deployed for mass domestic surveillance or for building fully autonomous weapons without human oversight. The Pentagon insisted otherwise. Heres where the similarities between Amodei and Euriskos Wilczek get really interesting. (The fact that Amodei bears something of a physical resemblance to Wilczek cant be ignored either.) Why did the fictional founder want to protect civilian populations from the U.S. Defense Department using his AI? He explains it himself in the following exchange with Mulder: Wilczek: After the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Robert Oppenheimer spent the rest of his life regretting he’d ever glimpsed an atom. Mulder: Oppenheimer may have regretted his actions but he never denied responsibility for them. Wilczek: He loved the work, Mr. Mulder. His mistake was in sharing it with an immoral government. I won’t make the same mistake. Amodei publicly presents himself in a similar light, if with less on-the-record talk about government immorality. He has frequently recommended Richard Rhodess book The Making of the Atomic Bomb in interviews, reportedly used to give copies of the book to new employees, and keeps one on prominent display in the Anthropic library. Though Amodeis peer, OpenAI founder Sam Altman, has also spoken often of Oppenheimer as a cautionary example, Amodei has now proven more willing to stick to his guns on the issue. In recent weeks, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth gave Anthropic an ultimatum to drop its demand for safety guardrails or face consequences. Anthropic refused. As a result, Hegseth made good on his threat, formally designating Anthropic a supply chain riskthe first time the Pentagon has applied that label to a U.S. AI firm. Anthropic has since sued the Pentagon over this measure. As a bonus, the White House labeled Anthropic a radical left, woke company, and President Trump directed all federal agencies to stop using Claude. Meanwhile, former Oppenheimer-recaller Altman has agreed to let OpenAI fill the military void, albeit with guardrails, according to the company. AI at war The X-Files episode Ghost in the Machine ends with the Department of Defense thwarted and its desired AI, which has ostensibly been destroyed, telegraphing to viewers it is still alive, so to speakthe epilogic hand flying out of a grave in a horror movie. In real life, though, the government got a hold of its AI without the need for any innuendo. Despite the formal ban on federal use of Anthropics tools, parts of the U.S. military continue to rely on Claude in combat operations, since they were already deeply embedded. (Removing them completely could take months.) In the meantime, according to the Wall Street Journal, the current war with Iran is demonstrating Claudes usefulness. AI tools are helping gather intelligence, pick targets, plan bombing missions and assess battle damage at speeds not previously possible, the report reveals. AI helps commanders manage supplies of everything from ammunition to spare parts and lets them choose the best weapon for each objective. On February 28, at the start of the U.S.-Israel war on Iran, a Tomahawk missile struck an Iranian elementary school, claiming the lives of at least 175 peoplemost of them children. Recent reporting strongly suggests that not only was the U.S. at fault for the missile strike, but that the school was on a U.S. target list and may have been mistaken for a military site. As of this writing, nobody in the U.S. government has claimed responsibility for the mistake. The X-Files episode and movies like Terminator 2 stoked the fear that a sentient AI might decide to wipe out all of humanity. They couldnt foresee the more immediate threat in 2026: that an immoral government would decide to wipe out a portion of humanity and let AI take the blame.
Category:
E-Commerce
Nothing says springtime like a canvas tote drop from Trader Joe’s. That’s right. The highly anticipated shopping bags are back and ready to fly off the shelves (and, probably, the resale sites) once again. Trader Joe’s totes are historically massively popular. The brand’s mini totes, which are just 13-by-11-by-6 inches, first dropped in 2024 and became an instant sensation after going mega-viral on TikTok. Once they sold out, they quickly began popping up on resale sites. While the totes only cost $2.99 in stores, resellers majorly marked them up, with some listing the bags for hundreds or even thousands. Since 2024, Trader Joe’s has released a few other versions of the totes as well, like Halloween-themed bags, which were also massively popular. Now, the bags are coming back, and this time, you can get one in a larger (more practical?) size. Nakia Rohde, a Trader Joes spokesperson, told Fast Company that the “next new bag will be a large canvas bag with lavender handles and a pink logo.” That means you’ll be able to hold way more TJ’s goods. But if your heart is set on the mini bag, don’t fret. They are heading back to stores this spring, and they’ll be popping up in the same springtime colors as last year: delicate pink, baby blue, mint green, and lovely lavender. Still, you’ll have to stay nearby Trader Joe’s if you want to snag one. Rohde did not give an exact date that any of the totes will be available nationwide, but said they should be in stores by mid-March, with dates varying based on location. It may also be a good idea to refer to your local TikTok influencer. TJ’s tote bags are certainly not the first item to experience viral fame that leads to an instant surge in purchases. Stanley tumblers, mini waffle makers, beauty products, and tons of other everyday items have, too. However, the Trader Joe’s totes have not seemed to lose their luster since they first arrived on the scene. And, remarkably, it all happened without the brand even having to advertise the bags at all. Our Mini Canvas Tote Bags certainly sold more quickly than we anticipated, Rohde told AP News in 2024. Before we had the opportunity to promote them in any way, customers across the country found them at their neighborhood Trader Joes.
Category:
E-Commerce
René Redzepi, the chef behind Copenhagen’s Noma, has resigned from the iconic restaurant he co-founded and its food non-profit MAD, amid abuse allegations. The move comes after protesters gathered outside Noma’s 16-week Los Angeles pop-up Wednesday. A recent New York Times article reports that former employees of the restaurant allege a pattern of abuse, including “punching, slamming, screaming,” from 2009 and 2017. The Times interviewed dozens of former employees throughout 18 of the chef’s 23 years at the restaurant. The report also alleges unpaid interns worked 16-hour days. On Wednesday, protestors outside Noma’s L.A. pop-up chanted and held up signs that read Unpaid Labor Built Your Empire, and No Michelin Stars for Violence. (The price for dinner at the L.A. residency is a staggering $1,500 a person.) Fast Company has reached out to Noma and Redzepi for comment on the allegations and protest. Noma, which under Redzepi, put New Nordic cuisine on the map, holds three Michelin stars and is considered one of the best restaurants in the world, if not the best. “An apology is not enough; I take responsibility for my own actions,” Redzepi wrote on Instagram. I have worked to be a better leader and Noma has taken big steps to transform the culture over many years. I recognize these changes do not repair the past.” “After more than two decades of building and leading this restaurant, Ive decided to step away and allow our extraordinary leaders to now guide the restaurant into its next chapter,” he added. As a result of the controversy, a number of corporate sponsors have withdrawn their support for the L.A. pop-up, including American Express and its booking playform Resy, Blackbird, and Cadillac. Redzepi’s fall from grace is especially surprising given the number of accolades the chef has received over the years and the cult-status Noma achieved. However, he is not the first celebrity chef to resign amid accusations of abuse. Perhaps the most notable is Mario Batali, who was forced out of his Italian food-hall Eataly in 2017 after sexual harassment and assault accusations, and had to sell his minority stake in the company. He was later found not guilty in a Boston court while on trial for indecent assault and battery in 2019.
Category:
E-Commerce