Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

22.02Apple is reportedly considering red as the next premium color for its iPhones
22.02Apple's first event of the year will reportedly bring at least five products over a 'three-day blitz'
22.02How to send a message via satellite on iPhone
22.022026 Olympics: How to watch the Winter Games Closing Ceremony today
21.02The Stop Killing Games campaign will set up NGOs in the EU and US
21.02The US will send Tech Corps members to foreign countries in its latest push for AI dominance
21.02A judge ruled Tesla still has to pay $243 million for a fatal crash involving Autopilot
21.02How to know if an AirTag is tracking you
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

22.02Apple is reportedly considering red as the next premium color for its iPhones
22.02Apple's first event of the year will reportedly bring at least five products over a 'three-day blitz'
22.02The uncertainties facing businesses and consumers after Trump's tariff changes
22.02Ben Franklin found the secret to happy aging 275 years ago. Modern psychology agrees
22.02Homeland Security suspends TSA PreCheck and Global Entry airport security programs
22.02'Done deal': CM Himanta Biswa Sarma on NDA seat-sharing for Assam polls
22.02Funding approved to reduce cold deaths
22.02How to send a message via satellite on iPhone
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .