Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

11.01Google's new commerce framework cranks up the heat on 'agentic shopping'
11.01California's governor plans to set aside $200 million for state EV tax credits
11.01Wing's drone deliveries are coming to 150 more Walmarts
10.01Elon Musk says X's new algorithm will be made open source next week
10.01GameStop reportedly shuts down more than 400 US stores
10.01An Instagram data breach reportedly exposed the personal info of 17.5 million users
10.01Dont count on Baldurs Gate 3 coming to Switch 2, as least for now
10.01SpaceX can deploy 7,500 more Starlink Gen2 satellites with FCC approval
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

12.01Andrew Freris on political pressure on the Fed, soaring gold and where to invest in a Messy world
12.01Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told
12.01Monday Watch
12.01Q3 likely to be modest for IT, commentary more crucial than numbers: Sandip Agarwal
12.01CPI, Chips and Court Rulings: What could move US markets this week
12.01After blockbuster 2025, metal stocks tumble up to 10% weekly this year. Whats ahead?
12.01Sensex suffers the worst start to a year in a decade. What this selloff means for investors?
12.01At record high! Gold prices jump Rs 2,000, silver rallies Rs 10,000: What's fuelling the surge?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .