Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

23.02Anthropic accuses three Chinese AI labs of abusing Claude to improve their own models
23.02Summer Game Fest runs from June 5-8
23.02Bungie says 'no second chances' if you're caught cheating in Marathon
23.02Nothing reveals the Phone 4a ahead of schedule
23.02Ball x Pit will land on iOS and Android on March 12
23.02Lamborghini ditches plans for its all-electric supercar due to 'close to zero' buyer interest
23.02A new Evangelion series is coming from Studio Khara and Yoko Taro, creator of NieR
23.02The creators of Dark Sky have a new weather app
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

23.02Stocks Lower into Final Hour on US Global Tariff Uncertainty, AI Industry Disruption Worries, Crypto Plunge, Tech/Financial Sector Weakness
23.02Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
23.02Bull Radar
23.02Bear Radar
23.02Yes, Dunkins massive 48-ounce coffee bucket is real: List of sightings grows at locations in multiple states
23.02Anthropic accuses three Chinese AI labs of abusing Claude to improve their own models
23.02Damage to streets remains after freight train derailment in Dixmoor, investigation continues in Chicago Ridge
23.02What Makes This Trade Great: Hecla Mining (HL) Short Setup
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .