Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

19.02Sony is shutting down the studio behind the Demon's Souls remake
19.02Meta is shuttering Messengers standalone website, which is a thing that exists
19.02Here are my favorite things from Toy Fair 2026
19.02Ring could be planning to expand Search Party feature beyond dogs
19.02YouTube is bringing the Gemini-powered 'Ask' button to TVs
19.02Rivian rolls out an Apple Watch app with vehicle controls and digital key support
19.02Orbital AI data centers could work, but they might ruin Earth in the process
19.02West Virginia is suing Apple alleging negligence over CSAM materials
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

19.02Bull Radar
19.02Bear Radar
19.02Stocks Lower into Final Hour on Escalating US/Iran War Fears, Earnings Outlook Jitters, Technical Selling, Financial/Airline Sector Weakness
19.02Afternoon Market Internals
19.02Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
19.02Hollywood is freaking out over a viral AI video showing Brad Pitt and Tom Cruise fighting
19.02Why some United flyers will suddenly earn less for the same flights
19.02The legal fight that could force Apple to rethink iCloud design
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .