Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

30.10How LinkedIn Helps Early-Career Professionals [Infographic]
30.10Turn One Webinar Into 30 Days of Content in Under 3 Hours
30.10You've Built It, Now Try Explaining It: Naming What Hasn't Before Existed
30.10A touchscreen console for tabletops, Board turns digital gaming into shared, physical play
29.10How AI Is Being Used for Workplace Emails
29.10From Services to SaaS: The Secret to Agency Profitability?
29.10During off-peak hours, hospitality chain Mooie Boules repurposes venues as community hubs
28.10The State of Agency-Side Marketing Strategy in 2025
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

31.10Friday Watch
31.10Market consolidating, but trend remains upbeat: Rohit Srivastava
31.10Lenskart IPO opens today: Check GMP, brokerages review, subscription and other details
31.10Illinois lawmakers bring forth latest plan to overhaul Chicago-area public transit as deadline looms
31.10Gayle King may be out as host of CBS Mornings next year
31.10Trade takeaways from President Trumps meeting with Chinese leader Xi Jinping
31.10Asian shares, US futures rise on tech results, gold holds gain
31.10Blockbuster November looms for Indias IPO market with over Rs 76,000 crore worth of issues lined up
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .