Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

20.11The Most Appropriate and Inappropriate Emojis at Work [Infographic]
20.11How Digital Twins Are Transforming B2B Marketing Product Launches
20.11In Tokyo, a new space for writing letters to the departed as a quiet ritual of grief
19.11The State of AI Use Among Professional Writers
19.11Performance Branding: The Misalignment Between Brand and Performance Marketing
19.11Soccer league unveils blueprint for stadiums built around women, not men
18.11Retailers Black Friday codes appear when baking sheets hit the oven
18.11LinkedIns Advertising Business Is Surging
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

21.11Friday Watch
21.11Afghanistan seeks new trade routes as Pakistan ties sour
21.11Zohran Mamdani says he wants to talk affordability with Trump and isn't worried he's walking into a trap
21.11Fed's Paulson is 'cautiously' approaching December rate decision, she says
21.11Trump's Ukraine envoy Keith Kellogg expected to leave his post as new peace plan emerges
21.11Graduate jobs under threat from AI, PwC boss says
21.11Groww Q2 results today: What to expect as the market awaits first post-listing scorecard
21.11Negative Breakout: These 7 stocks cross below their 200 DMAs
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .