Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

05.03Corona Cero maps sunlight to help urban workers find better spots for lunch breaks
04.03Soccer club PSG scales from a sold-out 10K in Paris to year-round run clubs worldwide
03.03The new creative class? Amsterdam agency recruits 70-somethings to tackle client briefs
02.03Nine out of ten women say sex ed failed them. This company is pushing back
28.02This retro-inspired handheld comes with Banjo-Kazooie and Battletoads built in
28.02Alaska could be the next state to crack down on AI-generated CSAM and restrict kids' social media use
28.02Shuttered studio Bluepoint reportedly pitched a Bloodborne remake, but it got shot down by FromSoftware
28.02Everything announced at MWC 2026: The new Leica Leitzphone by Xiaomi, Honor's ultra-thin MagicPad 4 and more
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

05.03Quote: What an Economist Must Know
05.03Research Report: Minority Students Give Their Schools Poor Grades
05.03'Net Neutrality' Emerging as Ethical and Legal Issue
05.03Laptop Theft Becoming Nagging Security, Legal, and Ethical Issue
05.03British Airways Under Investigation for Allegations of Price Fixing
05.03Canadian Prime Minister Formally Apologizes for Chinese Head Tax
05.03Chinese Graduates Riot over Lackluster Satellite-School Diplomas
05.03Doctors to Seek Ethics-Board Approval for Full Face Transplant
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .