Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.01Mark Zuckerberg was initially opposed to parental controls for AI chatbots, according to legal filing
28.01Meta blocks links to ICE List, a Wiki that names agents
27.01Adobe Photoshop upgrades its Firefly-powered generative-AI editing tools
27.01Astronomers discover over 800 cosmic anomalies using a new AI tool
27.01Sennheiser debuts new models of wired headphones and earbuds
27.01Pornhub will become unavailable for many UK users as of February 2
27.01Apple and Google reportedly still offer dozens of AI nudify apps
27.01Sonos introduces Amp Multi for complicated residential installs
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

28.01UPS to cut 30,000 jobs as it moves away from Amazon
28.01Q3 results today: Maruti, L&T, GRSE and Pine Labs among 126 BSE-listed companies to announce earnings today
28.01Positive Breakout: These 13 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
28.01How I Used Trade Ideas and Ask EDGAR to Catch a 293% Winner in $BNAI
28.01Volatile markets split IPO strategies as firms rework listing timelines
28.01Can Income-Plus Arbitrage FoFs deliver stable, tax-efficient returns?
28.01Retired Chicago Fed chief sells Streeterville condo for $2.75M
28.01Auto companies fall on fear of more EU imports
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .