Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

27.02Netflix backs out of Warner Bros. Discovery bidding war
27.02iFi's new GO Link 2 DAC is a cheap way to reap the lossless benefits of your Spotify plan
26.02Block, the parent of Square and Cash App, is laying off over 4,000 people
26.02Guitar Hero vets RedOctane reveal their new music game
26.02Coach and Penguin Random House turn classic novels into readable bag charms
26.02NATO approves the iPhone and iPad for classified use
26.02An AI-generated Resident Evil Requiem review briefly made it on Metacritic
26.02The new $25 action game from the creator of Just Cause arrives on April 8
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

27.02Netflix drops bid for Warner Bros, clearing way for Paramount takeover
27.02Netflix declines to raise its offer to buy Warner Bros., putting Paramount in position to take over
27.02Netflix backs out of Warner Bros. Discovery bidding war
27.02iFi's new GO Link 2 DAC is a cheap way to reap the lossless benefits of your Spotify plan
27.02'I stopped engaging' due to Instagram, YouTube, woman tells landmark trial
26.02Block, the parent of Square and Cash App, is laying off over 4,000 people
26.02Even Dollar Tree is going after rich shoppers now
26.02Burger King rolls out AI headsets that track employee 'friendliness'
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .