Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

15.01X says Grok will no longer edit images of real people into bikinis
14.01Netflix will air new video podcasts from Pete Davidson and Michael Irvin this month
14.0128 advocacy groups call on Apple and Google to ban Grok, X over nonconsensual deepfakes
14.01Ryan Hurst cast as Kratos for live-action God of War show
14.01Civilization VII comes to Apple Arcade in February
14.01California is investigating Grok over AI-generated CSAM and nonconsensual deepfakes
14.01Verizon outage: Voice and data services down for many customers
14.01PS Plus Game Catalog additions for January include Resident Evil Village and Like a Dragon: Infinite Wealth
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

15.01Justice Department probe of Fed reignites autonomy debate
15.01Bharat Coking Coal IPO listing delayed: Check revised allotment, refund and listing timeline
15.01Silver ETFs rally up to 188% in 1 year. Should investors stay invested or book gains?
15.01Shadowfax IPO in focus: GMP and 10 key takeaways for investors ahead of subscription
15.01Silver at record highs: Can the rally sustain to cross $100 in January?
15.01Thursday Watch
15.01Oil prices sink more than 2% as Trump remarks calm concern about Iran
15.01Asian shares set for weaker open, crude oil falls
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .