Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

27.01People are uninstalling TikTok and downloading an indie competitor
26.01Google agrees to $68 million settlement in voice assistant privacy lawsuit
26.01Google aims to take the sting out of scheduling meetings with a new Gemini feature
26.01Ubisoft proposes even more layoffs after last week's studio closures and game cancellations
26.01How to generate AI images using ChatGPT
26.01Claude now offers deeper integrations with apps like Canva and Slack
26.01Trump admin reportedly plans to use AI to write federal regulations
26.01Ball x Pit's first update brings an endless mode and much more to the chaos
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

27.01Jan 26, How to Turn Your Goals into Action (Master Action Plan)
27.01Why owning sector leaders could be a smarter core bet in 2026, Axis Mutual Funds Karthik Kumar explains
27.01Q3 results today: Asian Paints, Vodafone and Tata Consumer among 59 BSE-listed companies to announce earnings
27.01Minnesota GOP gubernatorial candidate drops out, blaming Trumps immigration policy
27.01Trump raises US tariffs on South Korea imports to 25%
27.01Asian stocks dip on Korea tariffs, Yen holds gains
27.01Markets fall 4% in January over foreign fund outflows
27.01Morgan Stanley, BofA see more in best carry rally since 2009
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .