Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

23.01Sennheiser introduces new TV headphones bundle with Auracast
22.01Darth Maul's standalone series premieres on Disney+ on April 6
22.01JBL made a pair of AI-powered practice amps
22.01Telly has only delivered 35,000 of its free televisions with always-on ads
22.01David Ellison extends deadline for Warner Bros. Discovery takeover offer
22.01Fable will let you be a heartless landlord this fall
22.01Double Fine announces delightful-looking multiplayer pottery game Kiln
22.01Substack now has a TV app
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

23.01TikTok finalizes deal to avoid US ban, ending a long legal saga
23.01IndiGo Q3 profit plunges 75% amid pilot shortage, compensation costs
23.01Indian stocks, rupee rebound as Trump remarks ease concerns over tariffs on Europe
23.01IIFL nosedives 17% after receiving income-tax notice
23.01Equity's back on investors radar, white metal pales
23.01Softer domestic prices, rising input costs to weigh on steelmakers Q3 earnings
23.01Silver ETFs sink up to 20% as speculative frenzy unravels
23.01AI ready: The advantages of being a young entrepreneur
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .