Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

22.01Snapchat gives parents more info on who their kids are talking to
22.01Why Tokyos new cassette café treats friction as a feature, not a flaw
22.01Why Tokyos new cassette café treats friction as a feature, not a flaw
22.01X is also launching Bluesky-like starter packs
21.01Marshall's new Heddon hub adds multi-room audio to speakers with Auracast
21.01Apple is reportedly overhauling Siri to be an AI chatbot
21.01Apple is reportedly developing a wearable AI pin
21.01Microsoft ports the Xbox app to Arm-based Windows PCs
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

22.01Two charged after funeral firm collapse hit 46,000
22.01Snapchat gives parents more info on who their kids are talking to
22.01This whole city block got an indigenous redesign
22.01Why Tokyos new cassette café treats friction as a feature, not a flaw
22.01Why Tokyos new cassette café treats friction as a feature, not a flaw
22.01West Town 5-bedroom home with private rooftop terrace: $1.9M
22.01As AI becomes pervasive, CTOs need to talk to clients and educate their bosses
22.01What is brand well-being? And can it give you a competitive advantage?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .