Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

13.11With its deliberately incomplete truck, Toyota asks rural communities to finish the job
13.11How SaaS Solution Preferences Are Evolving [Infographic]
13.11How AI Is Reshaping the Modern Marketing Org
13.11AEO Optimization Checklists: How to Make Your Press Releases More Visible
12.11Smart yet simple compass empowers people with dementia to head out on their own
12.11The AI, Device, and Media Habits of Gen Alpha Teens in the US
12.11Inside the AI Video Boom: What OpenAI's Sora and Meta's Vibes Mean for Marketers
11.11A Tokyo startup uses AI to bring hyper-personalized brewing to self-service coffee bars
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.11ETMarkets PMS Talk| Midcaps are expensive, but Rs 1,0005,000 cr market-cap firms offer growth at reasonable valuations, says Pawan Bharaddia
14.11MAGA civil war: How a white nationalist blew up the American right
14.11Airlines are optimistic about a quick recovery ahead of Thanksgiving once the FAA ends flight cuts
14.11Chinas trade model is built on keeping others poor
14.11What trade war? China's export juggernaut marches on
14.11Wall Street sinks as investors fret about rate cuts
14.11Panic or cheer? Three possible Nifty reactions on volatile Bihar election results day
14.11Big-ticket IPOs return to favour as 2025 subscriptions hit four-year high
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .