Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

25.11The Top Frustrations B2B Buyers Have With Vendors
25.11How US Professionals Are Building Their Personal Brands [Infographic]
25.11Brand vs. Branding: Aligning Your Brand and Branding Builds Perception and Trust
25.11Bristol rolls out mobile clean energy hub for summer festivals and concerts
24.11Bailey Hikawas iPhone grip for Apple shows accessible design can fuel mainstream demand
22.11Wind-powered trimaran cuts Atlantic shipping time in half, with near-zero emissions
21.11AI Update, November 21, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
20.11The Most Appropriate and Inappropriate Emojis at Work [Infographic]
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

26.11Wednesday Watch
26.11Oil stabilises after Ukraine peace talks push prices to one-month lows
26.11Excelsoft Technologies shares to list today. Check GMP ahead of debut
26.11Foreign tourists to pay extra fee to visit US national parks
26.11New Zealand woman gets life sentence for 'suitcase murders' of her children
26.11Asian stocks extend gains on Fed rate-cut bets
26.11Sebi panel mulls overhaul of promoter definition for IPO-bound companies
26.11Will Blackstones Rs 6,196-crore infusion plan propel Federal Banks next phase of growth?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .