Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

13.02Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety
13.02Why Europes First Capital of Small Retail treats shops as public infrastructure
13.02The PS Plus Game Catalog additions for February include Marvels Spider-Man 2
13.02God of War is getting a remake trilogy, and a new retro-inspired action game is out today
13.02Silent Hill: Townfall takes the series' trademark fog to an eerie coastal community
13.02The next Metal Gear Solid remaster collection arrives this summer
12.02The first Control Resonant gameplay trailer shows Dylan defying physics in a sideways NYC
12.02Mina the Hollower resurfaces with a spring 2026 release window
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

13.02Friday Watch
13.02AI disruption, metal momentum and defence opportunity: Ajay Bagga maps the market landscape
13.02ETMarkets Smart Talk | Not rock-bottom yet, but India looks attractive vs mid-2024 excesses: Rahul Singh
13.02Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety
13.02HUL shares down 3% as Q3 PAT falls 30% YoY to Rs 2,118 crore
13.02Taylor Swift asks US government to block 'Swift Home' trademark
13.02Negative Breakout: These 14 stocks close below their 200 DMAs
13.02Judge temporarily blocks Trump administration cuts to health care grants in Illinois, other states
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .