Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

18.12Apple opens up iOS in Japan in response to new regulations
18.12Alexa+ can now answer your Ring doorbell and talk to people
18.12Meetup's new mobile app is designed to make it easier to meet people IRL
18.12OpenAI just launched an app store inside ChatGPT
18.12Ultrahuman brings snoring detection and respiratory health tracking to the Ring Air
18.12The FTC is reportedly investigating Instacart over its AI pricing tool
18.12Hrvatski Telekom uses food-scented billboards and GPS to help owners find their lost dogs
18.12Sony settles with Tencent over 'slavish' Horizon clone
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

18.12What Makes This Trade Great: FCEL and Letting the AI Do Its Job
18.12Mid-Day Market Internals
18.12Apple opens up iOS in Japan in response to new regulations
18.12Secondhand shopping is bigger than ever in 2025. Heres how to thrift your holiday gifts the right way
18.12Alexa+ can now answer your Ring doorbell and talk to people
18.12Is artificial general intelligence an illusion? Yann LeCun thinks so
18.12Tin Can has reinvented the house phone for todays families 
18.12Trump administration reveals plans for arms sales to Taiwan, worth over $10 billion
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .