Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

02.02TikTok says it's 'back to normal' after winter storm-related outages
02.02McDonalds wants its customers to know that bigmac is a terrible password
01.02Apex Legends won't be playable on Nintendo Switch after its next season
01.02Apple is already thinking about its second foldable iPhone, and it may be a clamshell
01.02Apple's online store now lets you build a new Mac exactly the way you want
01.02Indonesia is lifting its ban on Grok, but with some conditions
01.02How to replace your AirTag battery
31.01NVIDIA is still planning to make a 'huge' investment in OpenAI, CEO says
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

02.02Faisal Islam: Mandelson, Darling and the conversation I can't forget
02.02Bitcoin bloodbath: Selloff sparks fears of new crypto winter after weekend crash hits BTC, XRP, ETH, and others
02.02TikTok says it's 'back to normal' after winter storm-related outages
02.02UK fuel price comparison scheme goes live
02.02UK fuel price comparison scheme goes live
02.02Acting CTA chief lays out priorities after dodging fiscal cliff
02.02Why most corporate and tech chiefs are saying the bare minimum about events in Minneapolis
02.02How to stay in the zone all day
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .