Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

09.12Letterboxd Video Store's first film rentals will be available this week
09.12Congress removes right to repair language from 2026 defense bill
08.12Katsuhiro Harada is leaving Bandai Namco after 30 years
08.12An AI copycat of King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard went unnoticed on Spotify for weeks
08.12Google and Apple partner on better Android-iPhone switching
08.12TikTok announces shared feed and collections features
08.12How to watch Rivian's Autonomy and AI day and what to expect
08.12Meta will let Facebook and Instagram users in the EU share less data
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

09.12Fractional investing is turning Gen Z into early real estate owners, says Sourish Pal of Client Associates
09.12Terry Savage: How income can affect Medicare premiums
09.12Gold rises but investors stay cautious about 'hawkish' Fed tone
09.12Negative Breakout: These 7 midcap stocks cross below their 200 DMAs
09.12Can Nephrocares IPO prove a rewarding bet for long-term investors?
09.12Market expects one more rate cut as inflation stays benign
09.12ICICI Pru AMC IPO price band fixed at Rs 2,061-Rs 2,165, issue opens Dec 12
09.12'Living off grid is not a dream, it's a nightmare'
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .