Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

22.11Wind-powered trimaran cuts Atlantic shipping time in half, with near-zero emissions
21.11AI Update, November 21, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
20.11The Most Appropriate and Inappropriate Emojis at Work [Infographic]
20.11How Digital Twins Are Transforming B2B Marketing Product Launches
20.11In Tokyo, a new space for writing letters to the departed as a quiet ritual of grief
19.11The State of AI Use Among Professional Writers
19.11Performance Branding: The Misalignment Between Brand and Performance Marketing
19.11Soccer league unveils blueprint for stadiums built around women, not men
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

24.11PSU bank stocks losing momentum, wait for dips before going long: Anand James
24.11Oil falls as Ukraine peace talks edge toward a solution
24.11Gold dips as dollar firms on reduced rate-cut prospects
24.11Most top Indian investors see drop in net worth in JulySept quarter
24.11Truhome lines up FY26 IPO, aims to grab no. 2 spot soon
24.11Quarter the 13th: Banks feel the squeeze as margins get tight
24.11Overleveraged borrowers in microfinance down by a half
24.11Will Nifty break 26,300 and chart a fresh record high this week?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .