Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-10-08 21:45:32| Engadget

Artificial intelligence is expected to have an impact on the upcoming US election in November. States have been trying to protect against misinformation by passing laws that require political advertisements to disclose when they have used generative AI. Twenty states now have rules on the books, and according to new research, voters have a negative reaction to seeing those disclaimers. That seems like a pretty fair response: If a politician uses generative AI to mislead voters, then voters don't appreciate that. The study was conducted by New York Universitys Center on Technology Policy and first reported by The Washington Post. The investigation had a thousand participants watch political ads from fictional candidates. Some of the ads were accompanied by a disclaimer that AI was used in the creation of the spot, while others had no disclaimer. The presence of a disclaimer was linked to viewers rating the promoted candidate as less trustworthy and less appealing. Respondents also said they would be more likely to flag or report the ads on social media when they contained disclaimers. In attack ads, participants were more likely to express negative opinions about the candidate who sponsored the spot rather than the candidate being attacked. The researchers also found that the presence of an AI disclaimer led to worse or unchanged opinions regardless of the fictional candidate's political party. The researchers tested two different disclaimers inspired by two different state requirements for AI disclosure in political ads. The text tied to Michigan's law reads: "This video has been manipulated by technical means and depicts speech or conduct that did not occur." The other disclaimer is based on Florida's law, and says: "This video was created in whole or in part with the use of generative artificial intelligence." Although the approach of Michigan's requirements is more common among state laws, study participants said they preferred seeing the broader disclaimer for any type of AI use. While these disclaimers can play a part in transparency about the presence of AI in an ad, they aren't a perfect failsafe. As many as 37 percent of the respondents said they didn't recall seeing any language about AI after viewing the ads.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/viewers-dont-trust-candidates-who-use-generative-ai-in-political-ads-study-finds-194532117.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

07.12Apple's AirPods Pro 3 drop to $230 on Amazon
07.12The Lord of the Rings trilogy returns to theaters in January for 25th anniversary
07.12OpenAIs head of ChatGPT says posts appearing to show in-app ads are not real or not ads
07.12X shuts down the European Commissions ad account the day after major fine
07.12Missing NBC on Fubo? Here's how to watch Sunday Night Football this week and more
06.12Judge puts a one-year limit on Google's contracts for default search placement
06.12Apple's Johny Srouji could continue the company's executive exodus, according to report
06.12Waymo's robotaxi fleet is being recalled again, this time for failing to stop for school buses
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

08.12Trump raises potential concerns over $72bn Netflix-Warner Bros deal
08.12Asian stocks tread water at the start of Fed week
08.12Japan is facing a dementia crisis can technology help?
08.12China's Central Bank extends gold-buying as metal's rally cools
08.12Is Corona Remedies IPO a compelling bet for long-term wealth creation?
08.12Will Nifty break past 26,350 for a fresh rally this week?
08.12Can Japan get more female business leaders?
08.12Short-term debt funds may gain favour amid dovish rate outlook
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .