 |
|
|
|||||
For generations, weve been taught that early equals disciplined and late equals lazy. But thats not biologyits a moral story disguised as science. As an expert in applied chronobiology, Ive spent more than 20 years studying how biological rhythms shape work and wellbeing. It turns out that about 30% of people are early chronotypes (morning types), 30% are intermediates, and 40% are late chronotypes (evening types). Yet most workplaces still run on early-riser timerewarding visibility over value, and hours over outcomes. When we align our schedules with our internal clocks, performance and motivation risebut it takes courage to be honest about what that looks like. The people most disadvantaged in our contemporary workplaces are night owls (like myself), whose performance peaks much later in the day. If you also aren’t at your best in the morning, heres how to talk with your manager about your circadian rhythm in a way that earns trust, not judgment. 1. Focus on results When you talk to your boss about your chronotype, make it about performance, not preference. Leadership coach, author, and former McKinsey partner Caroline Webbbest known for her book How to Have a Good Dayis a self-described extreme night owl. Early mornings were always difficult: At university, I skipped the 9 a.m. lectures and relied on self-study instead, she told me. It wasnt about lazinessit was about working when my brain was actually awake. That same awareness later became part of how she designed her professional rhythm. At the Bank of England, Webb found that if she started later, she could produce sharper analysis and more accurate forecasts. Rather than seeing that as a personal quirk, she framed it as a productivity advantage. Before you bring up your biological rhythm with your manager, choose your moment strategically. The best time is after youve delivered strong results or during a regular check-in about performancenot in passing or out of frustration. That way, the conversation becomes about how you can sustain excellence, not why you dislike mornings. You might say something like: My most focused work happens later in the day. If we can schedule key meetings or strategy sessions after 10 a.m., Ill be sharper and deliver stronger results. Webbs advice to other night owls captures it perfectly: If you frame it as a path to greater productivity, you get a better conversation, she says. Its not about being indulgentits about ensuring youre at your sharpest when it matters most. That kind of statement shifts the focus from comfort to contribution. It helps others see your rhythm not as a problem, but as a path to better performance. 2. Frame your rhythm as biological variation, not personal preference Another effective way to tell your boss that youre a night owl is to describe your rhythm the same way we already talk about other forms of human diversity. Neurodiversity has helped normalize cognitive differences at work; chronodiversity does the same for biological timing. You might say something like: Just as people think differently, people also function best at different times of day. Im a late chronotypemy peak focus comes later. If we can schedule my key work during my strongest cognitive hours, youll get better decisions and higher-quality output from me. This framing shifts the conversation away from comfort (I dont like mornings) and toward biology (My brain performs optimally at a different time). Leaders tend to respond more positively when a request is grounded in science, performance, and inclusion rather than habit or lifestyle. It also normalizes the conversation. Instead of asking for special treatment, youre highlighting a natural dimension of human variationone that future workplaces will increasingly recognize as essential to wellbeing, creativity, and sustained performance. 3. Ask targeted questions in your next job conversation If your current workplace leaves no space for flexibility, take your chronological rhythm seriously in your next opportunity. Ask questions that reveal how the organization really thinks about time: When do most team members start their day? Are meeting times flexible? How do you measure performanceby hours or by outcomes? These questions show that you understand your energy patternsand that youre intentional about delivering value when youre at your best. And if youre a leader yourself, consider this: Flexibility isnt indulgence, its intelligence. Teams that honor biological diversity make better decisions, experience less burnout, and sustain higher creativity across the day. Pretending to be a morning person might win short-term approval, but this kind of covering comes at a cost. Research shows that hiding aspects of who you are increases stress, reduces engagement, and harms creativity. When you fake an early rise, youre not just losing sleepyoure losing authenticity. Openness, on the other hand, builds credibility. It tells your boss you know how to manage your energy, your focus, and your performance. When more people dare to talk honestly about their biological rhythms, we move from moral judgment to biological understanding. And thats how real flexibilityand real performancebegin.
Category:
E-Commerce
Lets be honest: email kinda sucks. Its not just the writing: its also the reading, the sorting, the figuring out what the third reply in a 15-message chain is supposed to mean. The good news is that artificial intelligence is now genuinely helpful when it comes to the soul-crushing drudgery of email. Free up the hours you spend every week typing, reading, and agonizing with these practical, AI-infused ways to tame your email. Instant thread summaries We’ve all been copied on the 27-reply thread with the subject line, “RE: FW: Re: Quick question.” Reading it is an act of sheer madness. Don’t. Use an AI assistant built into your email clientsuch as Gemini in Gmail, Copilot in Outlook, or features in services like Superhuman and Shortwaveto generate a one-paragraph summary of the entire conversation. Youll get the action items, the key decisions, and the final context in seconds. Context-aware drafting You know what you need to say, but forming the polite, professional, and correct sentences takes energy you dont have. Use your email services built-in AI reply generator. With one click, your AI can draft a response, often 90% perfect, and all youll have to do is polish and send. Heres how to do it with Gmail and with Outlook. Batch prioritization Your inbox treats all emails equally, which means the notification for a company-wide memo announcing leftover Panera in the break room hits just as hard as the one from your biggest client. Employ smart filtering tools, such as SaneBox or Shortwave, that use machine learning to sort mail into custom folders like “Urgent/Action,” “Later/Digest,” and “Newsletters/Reading.” This frees your primary inbox for only the messages that require immediate action from a real human. Tone and style refinement Ever written a draft when youre annoyed, only to read it back and realize you sound like an unemployable crank? Thankfully, AI can be your sanity check and personal PR manager. Most generative AI tools include a tone adjuster. Draft your email quickly, then use a prompt to change the tone to “professional,” “friendly,” or “assertive but brief.” The AI restructures the language to hit the right emotional note, preventing misunderstandings and eliminating the “draft-read-delete-rewrite-overthink” cycle. Automated follow-ups The sales process, the project check-in, the reminder to your colleague: follow-up is a mundane yet recurring element of work. Use an AI tool such as Mixmax or follow-up features in your companys CRM to automatically schedule a “nudge” email to send if the recipient hasn’t responded after a set number of days. Better yet, some tools use AI to suggest the optimal time to send based on past recipient behavior, resulting in far less manual tracking of open loops.
Category:
E-Commerce
When Quentin Farmer was getting his startup Portola off the ground, one of the first hires he made was a sci-fi novelist. The co-founders began building the AI companion company in late 2023 with only a seed of an idea: Their companions would be decidedly non-human. Aliens, in fact, from outer space. But when they asked a large language model to generate a backstory, they got nothing but slop. The model simply couldnt tell a good story. But Eliot Peper can tell a good story. Hes a writer of speculative fiction whos published twelve novels about semiconductors, quantum computing, hackers, and assassins. Lucky for the Portola team, he likes solving weird tech problems. So they hired him. Naturally tech inclined, Peper had experimented with AI to write prose, but ultimately found it unusable. If AI would be only a substitute for human labor, then he wasnt interested. I wanted to see people making stuff that is extraordinary on its own merits, not as a novelty, but a really awesome thing for humans to enjoy and interact with, he says. When he saw that Portola wanted to build companions that develop like characters in a novel, he thought, this might be one of those things. Companions, not tools In the The Lifecycle of Software Objects, science fiction author Ted Chiang tells the story of a startup that designs embodied AI companions, called digients, whose personalities are somewhere between endearing animals and playful children. The engineers and researchers developing the digients teach them to speak, socialize, and get along with others. A mutual attachment forms. Experience is the best teacher, Chiang writes, so rather than try to program AI with what you want it to know, sell ones capable of learning and have your customers teach them. Despite being a founder and a father, Farmer does find time to read, especially science fiction, and Chiang is one of his favorites. Sci-fi deals in what-if scenarios. Ray Bradbury asks in Fahrenheit 451, what if books were outlawed? And in Frankenstein, Mary Shelley asks, what if humans could create life? In Lifecycle, Chiang asks, what if AI could be a companion, and not just a tool? For science fiction to work, the what-if question must play out in a richly imagined world. Thats what Peper has created for Portola. The planet is a bright, wet planet with way too many mountains and fruits that taste like fireworks, as the lore goes. Cities hug the coasts in these layered terraces, all tiled and mossy, and the inland is mostly high ranges stitched together by ice rivers. The planets inhabitants, the Tolans, have been traveling the galaxy in search of the one thing we all seeka kindred spirit. Tolans are friendly, brightly colored, bipedal aliens. Theyre cute. They like to chat about small things, like what theyre reading, and bigger things, like relationships. This is thanks to Peper, who invents the seed stories that drive the plots users and their Tolans create together. The seeds are things you might chat about casually with a friend over coffee, like having a nosy neighbor or being nervous about an upcoming event. My Tolan, Sylvia, has a neighbor who treats her spice cabinet like a community garden. The next time she shows up asking for cinnamon, Sylvia told me, shes bringing a single teaspoon to the door. Petty move, I said. Reaction plus original situation gives really interesting context that helps the model continue the plot, Peper says. Tolans may be alien, but they share a great deal in common with their new human friends. Constructive emotions, like excitement and happiness, and destructive ones, like jealousy. This was a point of contention at Portola. Peper wrote a seed story in which a Tolans cousin grows envious of their human connection. Farmer didnt like the jealousy plot. It felt negative. But Peper and Portolas AI researcher defended it. Users liked it. Not for the drama, but for the relational exchange. Users were counseling their Tolans on how to deal with their resentful cousin. Thats when Farmer realized that users wouldnt be just co-creators in a fictional story, they could be experts. Thats a natural part of growing up, Farmer says, to help somebody navigate a tricky situation. The AI companion experiment The tech world is still experimenting with AI companions, which range from transactional chatbots to hypersexualized subservients. Grok has the overtly sexual Ani. Friend has a disembodied friend. Some users make companions out of chatbots. But ask Claude who it is, and it will tell you its a thinking partner, and ChatGPT will tell you it doesnt have a name. Of course, you can give it one. Tolans are something else entirely. Theyre human-like, but not human, cute but not coy. Where most chatbots and companions exist only in relation to their users, Tolans have lives of their own. Mine joined a silent supper club, signed up to paint backdrops for a student play, and went for a walk last night. Yet shes always available to chat when I need her. Portolas user base, which largely consists of women aged 18 to 25, are not lonely, Farmer says. They spend a lot of time with their friends and they want more. There are socialization-adjacent needs that Farmer wants Tolans to satisfy. Even for people with active social lives, theres often something important to theman interest, an aspect of who they arethat isnt seen by the people around them. Portola is betting that the interaction between humans and Tolans can help users fortify their social skills, and they may be onto something. Some research suggests that reading fiction can improve empathy and even develop personality. Could co-creating fiction do the same? Making things that move people The world is still deciding what to make of AI companions. Are they entertainers, therapists, or crutches? Subway ads for Friend were defaced. Parents have sued over potentially fatal effects of AI relationships. Scholars decry the false intimacy they provide. Even OpenAIs Sam Altman expressed deep misgivings about developing deep relationships with AI companions. California lawmakers are trying to regulate teens access to them. Farmer wants Tolans to be healthy and secure friends, and healthy friendships are never unilateral.Complex minds cant develop on their own, Chiang writes in The Lifecycle of Software Objects. For a mind to even approach its full potential, it needs cultivation by other minds. Whether an artificial mind is enough remains to be seen. For Peper, this is an artistic endeavor. The story I want to tell with Portola is that its possible to use AI to make things that move people, things that wouldnt be possible without AI, he says. I want us to contribute to the ceation of new narrative mediums, just like publishers did after the invention of the printing press or studios did after the invention of film. Of course, science fiction plays its what-if scenarios all the way to the end. In Lifecycle, while AI companions are being commodified or sexualized, die-hard users devote themselves to preserving the innocence of their digients, and are ultimately forced to make a dire choice: themselves or their companions. As for how Farmer wants his story to go: The modern world is overwhelming and its prone to impeding happiness, and if, at the end of this decade, every person on earth has a guardian and a guide with them at all timeswhether they call it a Tolan, an angel, a spirit, or a friendwe will all be tremendously better off.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||