Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-12 19:57:06| Engadget

Google, the search giant that brought in more than $73 billion in profit last year, is protesting a California bill that would require it and other platforms to pay media outlets. The company announced that it was beginning a short-term test that will block links to local California news sources for a small percentage of users in the state. The move is in response to the California Journalism Preservation Act, a bill that would require Google, Meta and other platforms to pay California publishers fees in exchange for links. The proposed law, which passed the state Assembly last year, amounts to a link tax, according to Google VP of News Partnerships Jaffer Zaidi. If passed, CJPA may result in significant changes to the services we can offer Californians and the traffic we can provide to California publishers, Zaidi writes. But though the bill has yet to become law, Google is opting to give publishers and users in California a taste of what those changes could look like. The company says it will temporarily test blocking links to California news sources that would be covered under the law in order to measure the impact of the legislation on our product experience. Zaidi didnt say how large the test would be or how long it would last. Google is also halting new spending on California newsrooms, including new partnerships through Google News Showcase, our product and licensing program for news organizations, and planned expansions of the Google News Initiative. Google isnt the first company to use hardball tactics in the face of new laws that aim to force tech companies to pay for journalism. Meta pulled news from Facebook and Instagram in Canada after a similar law passed and has threatened to do the same in California. (Meta did eventually cut deals to pay publishers in Australia after a 2021 law went into effect, but said last month it would end those partnerships.) Google has a mixed track record on the issue, It pulled its News service out of Spain for seven years in protest of local copyright laws that would have required licensing fees. But the company signed deals worth about $150 million to pay Australian publishers. It also eventually backed off threats to pull news from search results in Canada, and forked over about $74 million. That may sound like a lot, but those amounts are still just a tiny fraction of the $10 - $12 billion that researchers estimate Google should be paying publishers.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/google-a-197-trillion-company-is-protesting-californias-plan-to-pay-journalists-175706632.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

16.01Google is appealing the ruling from its search antitrust case to avoid sharing data with rivals
16.01CyberGhost VPN review: Despite its flaws, the value is hard to beat
16.01Anthropic opens up its Claude Cowork feature to anyone with a $20 subscription
16.01OpenAI is bringing ads to ChatGPT
16.01The mother of one of Elon Musk's children is suing xAI over nonconsensual deepfake images
16.01Lego's latest educational kit seeks to teach AI as part of computer science, not to build a chatbot
16.01Canada cuts tariffs on Chinese EVs as part of new deal
16.01X has been down for most of the morning
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

17.01JioBlackRock Mutual Fund: MCX, HAL, Paytm among stocks bought and sold in December
17.01RBL Bank Q3 Results: Net profit rockets 555% to Rs 214 crore, interest income up 5% YoY
17.01Dolly Khanna adds smallcap stock that has delivered 105% return in last 6 months! Do you own?
17.01Vijay Kedia adds smallcap power stock to portfolio in December quarter. Check details
17.01The one measure that can tell us a lot about the state of the UK economy
17.01Cafe offers free breakfasts for vulnerable people
17.01Retail investors trim stakes in 12 small-cap stocks for 3 straight quarters; 3 surge over 100% in FY26
17.01Should AI be allowed to see everything at work?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .