Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

14.12Ayaneo's first smartphone is a major callback to the Xperia Play
13.12A new AAA Alien game is reportedly in the works
13.12Half-Life 3 is rumored to be a Steam Machine launch title and could arrive in spring 2026
13.12iOS 26.2 is here with another Liquid Glass tweak, new Podcasts features and more
13.12CRKD's Nitro Deck 2 works for both the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2
13.12WWE Saturday Night's Main Event: How to watch John Cena's final match for free
12.12Amazon pulls its bad AI video recaps after Fallout fallout
12.12IKEA's new wireless charger is as cute as it is practical
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.12Ayaneo's first smartphone is a major callback to the Xperia Play
14.12Condo Adviser: Board has right to access units for insect abatement treatment
14.12Train timetable revamp takes effect with more services promised
14.12Ahead of Market: 10 things that will decide stock market action on Monday
14.12Tories to scrap petrol car ban if they win next election
14.12Heres whats next from the creator of the Pebble smartwatch
14.12How 100-year-old firm went from Hull to Hollywood
14.12Brixton Soup Kitchen prepares for busy Christmas
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .