Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

20.11In Tokyo, a new space for writing letters to the departed as a quiet ritual of grief
19.11The State of AI Use Among Professional Writers
19.11Performance Branding: The Misalignment Between Brand and Performance Marketing
19.11Soccer league unveils blueprint for stadiums built around women, not men
18.11Retailers Black Friday codes appear when baking sheets hit the oven
18.11LinkedIns Advertising Business Is Surging
18.11How to Make Your Social Media Strategy Feel Organic [Infographic]
18.11How to Make Content Experimentation an Always-On, Low-Lift Part of Your Workflow
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

20.11Stocks Reversing Sharply Lower into Final Hour on Crypto Plunge, Fed "Behind the Curve" Fears, Technical Selling, Tech/Alt Energy Sector Weakness
20.11Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
20.11Bull Radar
20.11Bear Radar
20.11The Nvidia market rally couldnt save Bitcoins price: BTC sinks to new low today. Whats up with this crypto crash?
20.11Verizon begins laying off more than 13,000 employees in a bid to reorient the entire company
20.11NBCs Stumble: Why does Hollywood insist on treating narcolepsy as a punchline?
20.11When Market Strength Turns into Relentless Selling
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .