Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

10.12The best things Engadget editors bought in 2025
10.12Adobe brings Photoshop, Acrobat and Adobe Express to ChatGPT
10.12Stella Artois turns Google Maps reviewers into brand ambassadors
10.12Watch the Day of the Devs: Game Awards 2025 edition right here at 1PM ET
10.12Repair iconic 2000s-era gadgets in upcoming indie game ReStory
09.12Uber is installing kiosks for booking rides without the mobile app
09.12Slack's CEO is joining OpenAI to find the money to pay for all those data centers
09.12Instagram is generating SEO-bait headlines for its users' posts
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

10.12Adobe brings Photoshop, Acrobat and Adobe Express to ChatGPT
10.12The best things Engadget editors bought in 2025
10.12Wheaties just put Timothée Chalamet on thousands of boxes. Would you buy one?
10.12Dropboxs head designer is an AI optimist
10.12This U.S. companys new magnet could loosen Chinas stranglehold on the supply chain
10.12The dangerous rise of the AI therapist
10.12The 32-year-old Colorado cowboy driving to the moonand eventually Mars
10.12Expect limited upside in near term, stick to stock-specific strategy; Vedanta, Motherson among top picks: CA Rudramurthy BV
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .