Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.02FCC approves the merger of cable giants Cox and Charter
27.02Trump orders federal agencies to drop Anthropic services amid Pentagon feud
27.02Paramount agrees to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, pays Netflix $2.8 billion for breakup
27.02The PS5 Pro is getting upgraded upscaling tech in March
27.02Google and OpenAI employees sign open letter in solidarity with Anthropic
27.02Heres your first look at Kratos and Atreus in Amazons upcoming God of War TV adaptation
27.02OpenAI secures another $110 billion in funding from Amazon, NVIDIA and SoftBank
27.02NASA overhauls Artemis program, delaying Moon landing to 2028
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

28.02Wall Street Week Ahead: AI disruption hangs over US markets as investors wary of risks
28.02With airlines in flight-adding frenzy, FAA says flight reductions are needed at OHare
28.02Rent tops 1,000 a month in more areas - find out where
28.02In effort to recoup after years of financial strain, Hawthorne Race Course files for bankruptcy
28.02FCC approves the merger of cable giants Cox and Charter
27.02Trump orders federal agencies to drop Anthropic services amid Pentagon feud
27.02Paramount agrees to buy Warner Bros. Discovery, pays Netflix $2.8 billion for breakup
27.02What the Warner Bros deal could mean for streaming, cinemas and news
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .