Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

27.02Lovable makes AI app builder free for Womens Day with USD 350 in credits
27.02Netflix backs out of Warner Bros. Discovery bidding war
27.02iFi's new GO Link 2 DAC is a cheap way to reap the lossless benefits of your Spotify plan
26.02Block, the parent of Square and Cash App, is laying off over 4,000 people
26.02Guitar Hero vets RedOctane reveal their new music game
26.02Coach and Penguin Random House turn classic novels into readable bag charms
26.02NATO approves the iPhone and iPad for classified use
26.02An AI-generated Resident Evil Requiem review briefly made it on Metacritic
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

27.02360 ONE's Mayur Patel spots opportunities in 4 sectors for your FY27 portfolio
27.02Anthropic CEO says AI company cannot in good conscience accede to Pentagons demands
27.02Manilam Industries India shares to list today. Here's what GMP indicates
27.02Anthropic boss rejects Pentagon demand to drop AI safeguards
27.02Lovable makes AI app builder free for Womens Day with USD 350 in credits
27.02Global Market Today | Asian markets retreat following decline in US stocks
27.02Sebi tightens rules on MF classification, overlaps
27.02NSE invites investment banks to pitch for managing IPO
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .