Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

11.01Google's new commerce framework cranks up the heat on 'agentic shopping'
11.01California's governor plans to set aside $200 million for state EV tax credits
11.01Wing's drone deliveries are coming to 150 more Walmarts
10.01Elon Musk says X's new algorithm will be made open source next week
10.01GameStop reportedly shuts down more than 400 US stores
10.01An Instagram data breach reportedly exposed the personal info of 17.5 million users
10.01Dont count on Baldurs Gate 3 coming to Switch 2, as least for now
10.01SpaceX can deploy 7,500 more Starlink Gen2 satellites with FCC approval
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

12.01After asset quality hit, small finance banks to sharpen risk controls for 2026
12.01Nifty in a bear hug, needs to break above 26,100 levels: Analysts
12.01Oil marketers may gain, producers may drain in Q3
12.01India's risk-reward prospects fine but not stellar; China threat a worry: Bhanu Baweja, UBS Investment Bank
12.01TCS to log a steady Q3 amid AI pivot, IT spending trend in focus
12.01Why luxury carmakers are now building glitzy skyscrapers
12.01Looking sharp! Trent plans high store density in mature markets
11.01Google's new commerce framework cranks up the heat on 'agentic shopping'
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .