Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.11Florida buyers are first to close on a home using AI, saving thousands in realtor fees
27.11Decathlon asks folks to shoot them an invite this Black Friday  for sports, not shopping
26.11SMB Landing Page Optimization Trends
26.11How to Turn a Branded B2B Podcast Into a High-Impact Revenue Engine
26.11With its new course, MasterClass reframes cybersecurity as a must-have skill for consumers
25.11The Top Frustrations B2B Buyers Have With Vendors
25.11How US Professionals Are Building Their Personal Brands [Infographic]
25.11Brand vs. Branding: Aligning Your Brand and Branding Builds Perception and Trust
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

29.11How the Trump administrations efficiency goals have exacerbated food waste
29.11The ChatGPT effect: How AI changed the way people search for things
29.11Want to save money on an Apple iPhone this holiday season? Try these 3 shopping hacks
29.11The danger of believing business myths
29.11Ashish Kacholia's portfolio shines in FY26: 3 stocks turn multibaggers, 5 fresh Q2 picks
29.11Neighbourhood businesses hit by series of break-ins
29.11Concurrent Gainers: 10 smallcap stocks that gain for 5 days in a row
29.11From mobile phones to cooked frogs, inside London's biggest lost property office
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .