Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

29.01Halide co-founder joins Apple's design team
28.01Mark Zuckerberg says Reality Labs will (eventually) stop losing so much money
28.01Astronomers share new insights about the early universe via the Webb Space Telescope
28.01Februarys PS Plus Monthly Games include Undisputed and Subnautica: Below Zero
28.01Patreon creators have to switch to subscription billing by November, thanks to Apple
28.01Native Instruments enters into insolvency proceedings, leaving its future uncertain
28.01Google brings its Nano Banana image generator to Chrome
28.01French Ubisoft workers vote to strike
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

29.01Halide co-founder joins Apple's design team
28.01Mark Zuckerberg says Reality Labs will (eventually) stop losing so much money
28.01Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
28.01Bull Radar
28.01Bear Radar
28.01Stocks Slightly Lower into Final Hour on Diminishing Fed Rate-Cut Odds, Precious Metal Mania, Technical Selling, Pharma/Oil Service Sector Weakness
28.01Meta stock price soars on strong Q4 ad sales. Spending on AI is way up, too
28.01Astronomers share new insights about the early universe via the Webb Space Telescope
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .