Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

30.10How LinkedIn Helps Early-Career Professionals [Infographic]
30.10Turn One Webinar Into 30 Days of Content in Under 3 Hours
30.10You've Built It, Now Try Explaining It: Naming What Hasn't Before Existed
30.10A touchscreen console for tabletops, Board turns digital gaming into shared, physical play
29.10How AI Is Being Used for Workplace Emails
29.10From Services to SaaS: The Secret to Agency Profitability?
29.10During off-peak hours, hospitality chain Mooie Boules repurposes venues as community hubs
28.10The State of Agency-Side Marketing Strategy in 2025
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

30.10Stocks Lower into Final Hour on Higher Long-Term Rates, Earnings Outlook Jitters, Profit-Taking, Tech/Consumer Discretionary Sector Weakness
30.10Spiraling effects of federal government shutdown leave lawmakers grasping for ways to end it
30.10Last-minute Halloween costume ideas inspired by news and pop culture that almost anyone can make
30.10Eli Lillys obesity and diabetes treatments fuel growth and spark bidding war
30.10Bull Radar
30.10Bear Radar
30.10Stellantis warns of one-off costs as revenue and shipments rise
30.10Republicans urge Trump administration to back Falun Gong lawsuit against Cisco
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .