Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

20.01Dr. Gladys West, whose mathematical models inspired GPS, dies at 95
19.01ASUS will not release any new smartphones this year
19.01UK agency questions Meta's policies for illegal gambling site ads
19.01TurboTax Deluxe is on sale for $45 ahead of tax season
19.01Bungie's Marathon arrives on March 5
19.01Musk claims Tesla will restart work on its Dojo supercomputer
19.01Threads has more global daily users than X on mobile for the first time
19.01Levi's closes the Gen Z skills gap with a new repair curriculum
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

20.01UK wage growth eases and payrolls drop
20.01NBFCs poised to outperform in easing rate cycle: Sandip Sabharwal
20.01'Emotional and financial' pressure of funeral fees
20.01Food charity delivers nearly 100,000 meals
20.01Inside the 'real life Repair Shop'
20.014 strategies for when youre going to lose your job but you dont know when
20.01Markets muted, select opportunities emerge amid volatility: Sunny Agrawal
20.01Wipro among 7 F&O stocks with a sharp rise in futures open interest
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .