Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

20.02Zillow brings its house-hunting experience to World of Warcraft
20.02Apple inks deal for IMAX screenings of live Formula 1 races
20.02Meta's metaverse is going mobile-first
19.02Slay the Spire 2 will enter early access on March 5
19.02Sony is shutting down the studio behind the Demon's Souls remake
19.02Meta is shuttering Messengers standalone website, which is a thing that exists
19.02Here are my favorite things from Toy Fair 2026
19.02Ring could be planning to expand Search Party feature beyond dogs
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

20.02Asos co-founder dies after Thailand balcony fall
20.02UK government finances better than expected in January
20.02UK government finances better than expected in January
20.02Fundamentals intact but markets search for fresh triggers, says Karthikraj Lakshmanan
20.02Closing factory workers paid to help at food bank
20.02Starmer 'appeasing' big tech firms, says online safety campaigner
20.02Our brains are wired to ignore information. Here are neuroscience-backed tips for communicating memorably
20.02Friday Watch
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .