Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

10.02Iberia caps Madrid-Barcelona airfares at EUR 99 after rail disaster 
09.02Riot Games is laying off half of the 2XKO development team
09.02DOJ may face investigation for pressuring Apple, Google to remove apps for tracking ICE agents
09.02OpenAI starts testing ads in ChatGPT
09.02Here's how to disable Ring's creepy Search Party feature
09.02YouTube TV launches curated subscription packages this week
09.02Apple's Magic Mouse drops to only $68
09.02The first PlayStation State of Play of 2026 will air on February 12
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

10.02Upstox not in a hurry for IPO, targets 2.3x jump in FY26 profit to Rs 500 crore
10.02US to exempt some Bangladeshi clothes from tariffs
10.02Navin Fluorine shares up 3% as Q3 net profit soars 122% to Rs 185 crore
10.02Positive Breakout: These 11 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
10.02Gov. JB Pritzker talked Bears with with NFL commissioner, says progress is being made to keep team in Illinois
10.02Actis enters race to re-acquire Sprng Energy from Shell at $2 billion valuation
10.02Jewellery stocks rally on back of US-India trade deal
10.02SBI logs biggest single-day gain in 19 months on strong Q3 results
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .