Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

30.01Apple just reported its best-ever quarter for iPhone sales
30.01Using underground robots, Goods will have groceries ready for pickup in 2 minutes
29.01Amazon discovered a 'high volume' of CSAM in its AI training data but isn't saying where it came from
29.01Elon Musks SpaceX and xAI are reportedly holding merger talks
29.01Publishers are blocking the Internet Archive for fear AI scrapers can use it as a workaround
29.01Waymo begins service at San Francisco International Airport
29.01Apple acquires Q.ai for a reported $2 billion
29.01Music publishers sue Anthropic for $3 billion over flagrant piracy
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

30.01Trump threatens tariffs on countries selling oil to Cuba
30.01Venezuelan MPs approve bill to open up oil sector to private firms
30.01US stock futures fall on Apple warning, gold up
30.01Foreign inflows must to put rupee on strong footing
30.01Responders recall a mission of recovery and grief a year after the midair collision near Washington DC
30.01BofA CEO Brian Moynihan flags India as major growth engine, calls for more capital to fuel expansion
30.01Visit the North Sea oil field used to store greenhouse gas
30.01Why the US dollar hit a four-year low and could fall further
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .