Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

27.11Decathlon asks folks to shoot them an invite this Black Friday  for sports, not shopping
26.11SMB Landing Page Optimization Trends
26.11How to Turn a Branded B2B Podcast Into a High-Impact Revenue Engine
26.11With its new course, MasterClass reframes cybersecurity as a must-have skill for consumers
25.11The Top Frustrations B2B Buyers Have With Vendors
25.11How US Professionals Are Building Their Personal Brands [Infographic]
25.11Brand vs. Branding: Aligning Your Brand and Branding Builds Perception and Trust
25.11Bristol rolls out mobile clean energy hub for summer festivals and concerts
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

27.11BBC joins officers on criminal network raids
27.11Labour ditches day-one protection from unfair dismissal in U-turn
27.11Banking giant to build 10bn tower at Canary Wharf
27.11How do Surrey businesses feel about the budget?
27.11Simon Jack: Businesses left asking - what happened to growth?
27.11Black Friday arrives with solid momentum despite tariffs and economic uncertainty
27.11OBR calls in cyber expert over botched release of Budget analysis
27.11Decathlon asks folks to shoot them an invite this Black Friday  for sports, not shopping
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .