Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

22.11Wind-powered trimaran cuts Atlantic shipping time in half, with near-zero emissions
21.11AI Update, November 21, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
20.11The Most Appropriate and Inappropriate Emojis at Work [Infographic]
20.11How Digital Twins Are Transforming B2B Marketing Product Launches
20.11In Tokyo, a new space for writing letters to the departed as a quiet ritual of grief
19.11The State of AI Use Among Professional Writers
19.11Performance Branding: The Misalignment Between Brand and Performance Marketing
19.11Soccer league unveils blueprint for stadiums built around women, not men
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

23.11G20 summit boycotted by US closes in South Africa
23.11From CIA cash to local police: How Palantir got its start
23.11Minister denies Budget leaks have damaged economy
23.11If youre not helping employees with AI-xiety, youre not leading
23.11Zillow just revised its home price forecast for 400-plus housing markets
23.11Whats your wabi-sabi?
23.11When AIs become consumers
23.11Will Nifty finally cross 26,277? Six triggers that could break the 421-day deadlock
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .