Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

23.01Google Photos can now turn you into a meme
23.01A rival smart glasses company is suing Meta over its Ray-Ban products
23.01Retro handheld maker Anbernic has a new gamepad with a screen and heart rate sensor
23.01Apple will begin showing more App Store ads starting in March
23.01Vimeo lays off most of its staff just months after being bought by private equity firm
23.01Tesla paywalls lane centering on new Model 3 and Model Y purchases
23.01Meta is temporarily pulling teens' access from its AI chatbot characters
23.01You can now create AI-generated coloring books in Microsoft Paint
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

24.01Stop tracking employee engagement. Try this instead
24.01IPO calendar: 5 new issues to hit the market next week, Shadowfax to debut on bourses
24.01Bitcoin consolidates around $90K as cautious investors wait for Fed meeting
24.01Defence, self-reliance, and budgetary priorities: Sectoral opportunities in a shifting strategic landscape
24.01Auto sector shifts gears in Q3; TVS Motors, Maruti Suzuki top buys, says Siddhartha Khemka
24.01Planning investments in your childs name? Key things to know before
24.01Living abroad but investing in India? Rules, taxes and key checks NRIs should know about mutual fund SIPs
24.01Quiet-Quitting of US assets fuels fresh EM, gold bets
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .