Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

23.01TikTok finalizes deal for its US entity
23.01Sennheiser introduces new TV headphones bundle with Auracast
22.01Darth Maul's standalone series premieres on Disney+ on April 6
22.01JBL made a pair of AI-powered practice amps
22.01Telly has only delivered 35,000 of its free televisions with always-on ads
22.01David Ellison extends deadline for Warner Bros. Discovery takeover offer
22.01Fable will let you be a heartless landlord this fall
22.01Double Fine announces delightful-looking multiplayer pottery game Kiln
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

23.01Demand for online jewellery boosts December retail sales
23.01Realty weakness overdone, midcap correction throws up long-term opportunities: Sandip Sabharwal
23.01Does TikTok's US deal threaten the company's global ambitions?
23.01Largecap IT looks safer than midcaps; IndiGo correction offers upside: Sandip Sabharwal
23.01Award-winning restaurant to close amid rising costs
23.01Jamie Dimon wants government to restrict AI layoffs
23.01Friday Watch
23.01Markets volatile, but earnings and structural story remain intact: Mayuresh Joshi
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .