Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.01Belgian supermarket Delhaize launches cooking camps for kids
28.01Mark Zuckerberg was initially opposed to parental controls for AI chatbots, according to legal filing
28.01Meta blocks links to ICE List, a Wiki that names agents
27.01Adobe Photoshop upgrades its Firefly-powered generative-AI editing tools
27.01Astronomers discover over 800 cosmic anomalies using a new AI tool
27.01Sennheiser debuts new models of wired headphones and earbuds
27.01Pornhub will become unavailable for many UK users as of February 2
27.01Apple and Google reportedly still offer dozens of AI nudify apps
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

28.01Adani Electricity Mumbai secures sovereign-grade rating after years of deleveraging
28.01EVs just outsold gas cars in Europe for the first time
28.01TikTok is tracking you now. Heres how to protect yourself
28.01Why Yann LeCun left Meta, and what it means for AIs next frontier
28.01How K-12 schools are left on their own to develop AI policies
28.01The rise of weather influencers
28.01CarTrade Tech shares slide 11% as investors look past Q3 revenue growth, margin expansion
28.01Why agentic AI belongs on every CEOs 2026 roadmap
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .