Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

16.01Kathleen Kennedy steps down as Lucasfilm president, marking a new era for the Star Wars franchise
16.01Senate passes minibus bill funding NASA, rejecting Trump's proposed cuts
15.01A $250 billion trade deal will see Taiwan bring more semiconductor production to the US
15.01Bluesky's 'Live Now' badge is available to everyone
15.01Amazon's New World: Aeternum MMO will go offline January 31, 2027
15.01Netflix's expanded Sony deal includes streaming rights to the Legend of Zelda movie
15.01Flaw in 17 Google Fast Pair audio devices could let hackers eavesdrop
15.01Amazon is making a Fallout Shelter competition reality TV show
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

16.01Oil flat as chances of US strike on Iran recedes
16.01Star Wars boss Kathleen Kennedy departs after 14 years in the role
16.01How realistic is India's quest for magnets made of rare earths
16.01Asia shares near record high on AI optimism, dollar up on receding Fed cut bets
16.01US stock leadership may broaden beyond tech
16.01Kathleen Kennedy steps down as Lucasfilm president, marking a new era for the Star Wars franchise
16.01Can domestic formulations shield Indian pharma from US pricing pressure in Q3?
16.01MFs rebalance new-age, IT portfolios ahead of Q3 result season
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .