Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

13.12CRKD's Nitro Deck 2 works for both the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2
13.12WWE Saturday Night's Main Event: How to watch John Cena's final match for free
12.12Amazon pulls its bad AI video recaps after Fallout fallout
12.12IKEA's new wireless charger is as cute as it is practical
12.12Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 devs dropped a big update after sweeping The Game Awards
12.12Google Translate is now better at translating slang terms and idioms using AI
12.12Doom studio id Software forms 'wall-to-wall' union, with 165 employees voting in favor
12.12AI Update, December 12, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

13.12CRKD's Nitro Deck 2 works for both the Nintendo Switch and Switch 2
13.12Planes, trains, automobiles: RDAs strategic plan sets 20-year goals
13.12Dalal Street Week Ahead: Nifty seen consolidating further before next directional move
13.12Richton Park tree lot that was the setting for a Hallmark Christmas movie shuts down after 40 years
13.12How Taylor Swift is turning the NFLs mass-media machine into a a pipeline for new male fans
13.12AI advertising slop is on the rise. The cure? The STFU brand strategy
13.1290 housing markets cross critical inventory thresholdtilting power toward buyers
13.12The 3 key financial lessons of Its a Wonderful Life
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .