Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

13.11With its deliberately incomplete truck, Toyota asks rural communities to finish the job
12.11Smart yet simple compass empowers people with dementia to head out on their own
12.11The AI, Device, and Media Habits of Gen Alpha Teens in the US
12.11Inside the AI Video Boom: What OpenAI's Sora and Meta's Vibes Mean for Marketers
11.11A Tokyo startup uses AI to bring hyper-personalized brewing to self-service coffee bars
11.11How CMOs Are Using AI for Their Jobs
11.11What Makes Customers Abandon Brands? [Infographic]
11.11Beyond AIO, AEO, GEO: Onsite Search Is the Strategic Layer You Control
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

13.11Bull Radar
13.11Bear Radar
13.11Deborah Norville, the former Inside Edition host and Chicago TV anchor, has a brand-new game
13.11Tariffs expected to raise prices for Christmas trees, other holiday decorations
13.11Neuroscience research says your next anti-aging product should be Duolingo
13.11With its deliberately incomplete truck, Toyota asks rural communities to finish the job
13.11What Makes This Trade Great: EGANs Earnings Breakdown Provides a Clean Short
13.11Mid-Day Market Internals
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .