Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

23.12Xbox cloud gaming comes to newer Amazon Fire TV models
23.12New York Times reporter files lawsuit against AI companies
23.12Apple's iOS 26.3 will introduce proximity pairing to third-party devices in the EU
23.122025 was the year Xbox died
23.12The Morning After: The best games of 2025
23.12How to set up an Apple Watch for a child
23.12The best Nintendo Switch 2 accessories for 2026
23.12US bans new foreign-made drones and components
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

23.12Xbox cloud gaming comes to newer Amazon Fire TV models
23.12New York Times reporter files lawsuit against AI companies
23.12Consuming news from AI shifts our opinions and reality. Heres how
23.12FCC bans new foreign-made drones over national security concerns
23.12The seller of a $34.5 million Winnetka home downsized with a $14 million buy in Kenilworth
23.12Japan will restart the worlds largest nuclear plant after clearing this last major hurdle
23.12SSCVA hopes to lend a hand in potential Chicago Bears stadium deal in Indiana
23.121 dead, 1 wounded in shooting on CTA Pink Line
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .