Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

02.12How Often Should Brands Be Sending Messages?
02.12The State of 'Job Hugging' Among US Workers [Infographic]
02.12The 72-Hour Webinar Follow-Up Playbook That Converts B2B Leads Faster
02.12Five Shifts to Help B2B Marketers Stop Marketing Like a Machine
02.12Colruyt debuts 24/7 plant-based pop-up on Brussels campus to drive protein transition
01.12Renault and Maison Kayser celebrate French heritage with a baguette giveaway
28.11Florida buyers are first to close on a home using AI, saving thousands in realtor fees
27.11Decathlon asks folks to shoot them an invite this Black Friday  for sports, not shopping
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

03.12Nike, Superdry and Lacoste ads banned over misleading green claims
03.12A president increasingly out of touch: Trump has lost his political superpower, polls show
03.12SEIU looks to beef up CPS ranks amid dispute with CTU
03.12Chicago-based Levy to provide food service at new $750 million Fire stadium
03.12Airbus to inspect some planes over 'quality issue' with panels
03.12Mark Manson is launching an AI app to help more people Subtly not Give a F*ck
03.12China is building the worlds first nuclear-proof floating island. Thats not good news for the U.S.
03.12OpenAI may be close to introducing ads for ChatGPT
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .