Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-04-18 15:15:17| Engadget

As learning language models (LLMs) continue to advance, so do questions about how they can benefit society in areas such as the medical field. A recent study from the University of Cambridge's School of Clinical Medicine found that OpenAI's GPT-4 performed nearly as well in an ophthalmology assessment as experts in the field, the Financial Times first reported. In the study, published in PLOS Digital Health, researchers tested the LLM, its predecessor GPT-3.5, Google's PaLM 2 and Meta's LLaMA with 87 multiple choice questions. Five expert ophthalmologists, three trainee ophthalmologists and two unspecialized junior doctors received the same mock exam. The questions came from a textbook for trialing trainees on everything from light sensitivity to lesions. The contents aren't publicly available, so the researchers believe LLMs couldn't have been trained on them previously. ChatGPT, equipped with GPT-4 or GPT-3.5, was given three chances to answer definitively or its response was marked as null.  GPT-4 scored higher than the trainees and junior doctors, getting 60 of the 87 questions right. While this was significantly higher than the junior doctors' average of 37 correct answers, it just beat out the three trainees' average of 59.7. While one expert ophthalmologist only answered 56 questions accurately, the five had an average score of 66.4 right answers, beating the machine. PaLM 2 scored a 49, and GPT-3.5 scored a 42. LLaMa scored the lowest at 28, falling below the junior doctors. Notably, these trials occurred in mid-2023.  While these results have potential benefits, there are also quite a few risks and concerns. Researchers noted that the study offered a limited number of questions, especially in certain categories, meaning the actual results might be varied. LLMs also have a tendency to "hallucinate" or make things up. That's one thing if its an irrelevant fact but claiming there's a cataract or cancer is another story. As is the case in many instances of LLM use, the systems also lack nuance, creating further opportunities for inaccuracy.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/gpt-4-performed-close-to-the-level-of-expert-doctors-in-eye-assessments-131517436.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

24.11Bailey Hikawas iPhone grip for Apple shows accessible design can fuel mainstream demand
22.11Wind-powered trimaran cuts Atlantic shipping time in half, with near-zero emissions
21.11AI Update, November 21, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
20.11The Most Appropriate and Inappropriate Emojis at Work [Infographic]
20.11How Digital Twins Are Transforming B2B Marketing Product Launches
20.11In Tokyo, a new space for writing letters to the departed as a quiet ritual of grief
19.11The State of AI Use Among Professional Writers
19.11Performance Branding: The Misalignment Between Brand and Performance Marketing
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

24.11Owners of Kee Firearms and Kee Construction found not guilty
24.11Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
24.11Bull Radar
24.11Bear Radar
24.11Stocks Surging into Final Hour on Rising Fed Rate-Cut Odds, AI Infrastructure Build-Out Optimism, Crypto Stabilization, Tech/Alt Energy Sector Strength
24.11How much is the national debt and should you care?
24.11Amazon plans $15B data center campuses in Northwest Indiana for states largest construction project
24.11Gyms, pubs and parkour - businesses share hopes
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .