Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

24.12Today's the last day to get $100 off the PS5 and PS5 Pro
24.12How to set up an iPad for a child
24.12Pro-Russian hacker group claims responsibility for DDoS attack on French postal service
24.12Toyota's Prius Prime saved me gas money but probably not the environment
24.12How to redeem game codes on the Nintendo Switch 2
24.12Samsung's latest Odyssey gaming monitor has a 32-inch 6K screen with glasses-free 3D
24.12US bans former EU Commissioner and others over social media rules
23.12New marketplace sells synthetic drugs for AI, allowing models to get weird and messy
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

24.12Stocks Rising into Final Hour on Lower Long-Term Rates, US Economic Data, Technical Buying, Financial/Consumer Discretionary Sector Strength
24.12China opens doors wider to check falling foreign inflows
24.12Today's the last day to get $100 off the PS5 and PS5 Pro
24.12UK, Canada, Germany and others condemn Israel's West Bank settlement plan
24.12Europe slams U.S. visa bans for targeting allies over censorship
24.12Chicago Bears player Colston Loveland paid $1.3M for a Long Grove home over the summer
24.12NIPSCO bill credits from data center could begin in 2027
24.12NORAD live tracker 2025: How to follow Santa Claus in real-time as he delivers Christmas gifts around the world
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .