Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

13.01Framework increases Desktop prices by up to $460 due to RAM crisis
12.01Our favorite UGreen 3-in-1 wireless charger is 32 percent off right now
12.01Lego's first Pokémon sets are now available for pre-order
12.01Anthropic made a version of its coding AI for regular people
12.01The Disney+ Hulu bundle is on sale for $10 for one month right now
12.01Mark Zuckerberg announces new 'Meta Compute' initiative for its data center and AI projects
12.01Paramount won't quit, files suit against Warner Bros. Discovery over rejected bid
12.01India is proposing another far-reaching security rule for smartphones
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

13.01Charity shortlisted after helping keep homes warm
13.01'I volunteer at the baby bank that helped me'
13.01This is why Elon Musk thinks you shouldnt save for retirement
13.01IFCI shares surge 21% in two days amid heavy trading volumes
13.01Tuesday Watch
13.01Gold and silver momentum high, but majority of move may be priced in: Ashi Anand
13.01Deepak Shenoy backs consumer-centric insurance reforms despite near-term distributor pain
13.01The 5 best sites for finding a remote job in 2026
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .