Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

13.02There's a new John Wick game on the way
13.02Marvel Tkon: Fighting Souls lands on PS5 and PC August 6 with X-Men in tow
13.02Death Stranding 2 for PC arrives on March 19
13.02A Neva prequel is arriving next week
13.02Ring calls off partnership with police surveillance provider Flock Safety
13.02Why Europes First Capital of Small Retail treats shops as public infrastructure
13.02The PS Plus Game Catalog additions for February include Marvels Spider-Man 2
13.02God of War is getting a remake trilogy, and a new retro-inspired action game is out today
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

13.02Theres no vacancy at Hotel Chocolat, but plenty of hot chocolate at the growing Chicago-based British import
13.02Popeyes is losing the chicken sandwich wars. Its comeback plan starts with low-performing locations
13.02Advertising made the internet accessible. Will it do the same for AI?
13.02There's a new John Wick game on the way
13.02The U.S. government has 3,000 AI systems in place. Will they fix anything?
13.02Anthony Edwards has a plan to get your attention
13.02San Jose just made its buses 20% faster
13.02Marvel Tkon: Fighting Souls lands on PS5 and PC August 6 with X-Men in tow
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .