Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

07.11AI Update, November 7, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
07.11McDonalds turns Happy Meal box into a blank canvas, inviting kids to draw how they feel
06.11The Top Workplace Tools Creating Friction and Lost Time [Infographic]
06.11How SMB Marketers Can Turn AI Hype Into Reality With Voice AI
06.11Why Do Large Language Models (LLMs) Love Press Releases?
06.11Seoul transforms subway stations into convenient hubs for the citys runners
05.11How Will AI Impact Marketing and Ad Agency Headcount?
05.11Implementing ABM? Why a Customer Advisory Board Should Be Step One
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

08.11US government shutdown forces some overseas bases to stop paying workers
08.11Gary bakery celebrates opening of its newest location
08.11Trump signals no shutdown compromise with Democrats as senators schedule rare weekend session
08.11Voters anger at high electricity bills and data centers looms over 2026 midterms
08.11UPS and FedEx grounding MD-11 planes following deadly Kentucky crash
08.11Council launches winter energy cost support scheme
08.11This week in business: from AI turbulence to airline refunds
08.11IPO Calendar: Busy week ahead with PhysicsWallah, Emmvee and Tenneco leading Rs 10,000 crore line-up
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .