Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

14.10Kokuyos Adult Motivation Pen gamifies learning through handwriting
13.10On search engine Lore, fans go deep down rabbit holes (and actually retain what they find)
10.10AI Update, October 10, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
10.10How circular fields could make farming more sustainable and more human
09.10FOMO Content Marketing: The Good and Bad of Chasing Trends [Infographic]
09.10How AI-Powered Natural Language Interfaces Can Transform Marketing Workflows
09.10The 4Ps Are a No-Brainer, But the 4Ms Are Crucial to Executing Marketing Plans
09.10No more waiting in line to fill that Rx: Amazon brings pharmacy kiosks to doctors offices
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.10Fiscal and monetary easing set stage for market upside ahead of festive season: Hiren Ved
14.10Wage growth slows slightly over summer
14.10Wage growth slows slightly over summer
14.10Family resort to cold showers amid energy bill rise
14.10Clean balance sheets and niche plays driving microcap wealth: Aniruddha Naha
14.10The end of the American Century: New possibilities for a rising Asia
14.10Kokuyos Adult Motivation Pen gamifies learning through handwriting
14.10Tata Investment Corp shares crash 90% in just one day! Is that true?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .