Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

26.11SMB Landing Page Optimization Trends
26.11How to Turn a Branded B2B Podcast Into a High-Impact Revenue Engine
26.11With its new course, MasterClass reframes cybersecurity as a must-have skill for consumers
25.11The Top Frustrations B2B Buyers Have With Vendors
25.11How US Professionals Are Building Their Personal Brands [Infographic]
25.11Brand vs. Branding: Aligning Your Brand and Branding Builds Perception and Trust
25.11Bristol rolls out mobile clean energy hub for summer festivals and concerts
24.11Bailey Hikawas iPhone grip for Apple shows accessible design can fuel mainstream demand
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

27.11Axis Mutual Funds Jayesh Sundar picks 3 contra ideas that may surprise in 2026
27.11China protests US move to restrict visas for Central Americans with Beijing ties
27.11Dominican Republic grants US access to restricted areas for its deadly fight against drugs
27.11Motilal plans private credit fund of up to $336 million
27.11Positive Breakout: These 11 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
27.11Asian stocks rise, Bitcoin trades above $90,000
27.11Flights to Washington's Ronald Reagan airport briefly paused following DC shooting, authorities say
27.11Long-term outcomes of popular IPO themes could disappoint: Prashant Jain
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .