Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

27.11Decathlon asks folks to shoot them an invite this Black Friday  for sports, not shopping
26.11SMB Landing Page Optimization Trends
26.11How to Turn a Branded B2B Podcast Into a High-Impact Revenue Engine
26.11With its new course, MasterClass reframes cybersecurity as a must-have skill for consumers
25.11The Top Frustrations B2B Buyers Have With Vendors
25.11How US Professionals Are Building Their Personal Brands [Infographic]
25.11Brand vs. Branding: Aligning Your Brand and Branding Builds Perception and Trust
25.11Bristol rolls out mobile clean energy hub for summer festivals and concerts
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

28.11Vedanta back in debt market, seeks Rs 2k cr via metals arm
28.11Global stocks hold steady after four-day rally
28.11Analysts see bullish trend intact as Nifty hits record high. What should investors do?
28.11Nifty breaks a 14-month lull, yet Silver and Gold returns dominate D-Street
28.11D-Street scales new peaks after 14 months as FPI selling cools, US-India deal eyed
28.11Asian stocks ebb as global rally loses momentum
28.11Will boats be a breakthrough for 3D printing tech?
27.11BBC joins officers on criminal network raids
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .