Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

30.01Apple just reported its best-ever quarter for iPhone sales
30.01Using underground robots, Goods will have groceries ready for pickup in 2 minutes
29.01Amazon discovered a 'high volume' of CSAM in its AI training data but isn't saying where it came from
29.01Elon Musks SpaceX and xAI are reportedly holding merger talks
29.01Publishers are blocking the Internet Archive for fear AI scrapers can use it as a workaround
29.01Waymo begins service at San Francisco International Airport
29.01Apple acquires Q.ai for a reported $2 billion
29.01Music publishers sue Anthropic for $3 billion over flagrant piracy
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

30.01Baby Boomers are retiring early. Gen Z wants to quit. Here are the real reasons why
30.01Layoffs update 2026: Amazon, Nike, Dow, and others join list of companies slashing jobs in brutal January
30.01The quick weekly reset high-performing leaders use to stay ahead of disruption
30.01No working, no shopping: Thousands of people hit the Trump administration where it hurts
30.01The fascinating history of the century-old sport of buildering 
30.01Why Taika Waititi keeps making Super Bowl commercials
30.01Deice responsibly: Why you shouldnt oversalt your driveway or sidewalk (and what to do instead)
30.01This very expensive fleece is making waves for looking like startup swag
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .