Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

09.02IKEA UAE launches a half-meter hot dog that barely fits in a FRAKTA bag
08.02The final trailer for Project Hail Mary is here and it's an emotional ride
08.02AT&T's budget-friendly phone for kids was designed with parental controls in mind
08.02We may see Apple's new iPads and MacBooks in only a matter of weeks
08.02Steam now lets developers display the exact date of when their game leaves Early Access
08.02The iPhone 17e will reportedly bring some key upgrades without raising the price
07.02New York lawmakers introduce bill that aims to halt data center development for three years
07.02DOJ is investigating if Netflix used anticompetitive tactics as part of its merger probe
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

09.02Donation appeal as vulnerable face food bank delay
09.02Japanese stocks surge as Takaichi secures historic election victory
09.02Why do so many legacy brands implode when trying to attract new customers?
09.02Women are leading the charge to become solopreneurs
09.02Monday Watch
09.02Kalyan Jewellers shares zoom to 10% upper circuit. What Motilal Oswal, JM Financial said after Q3 results
09.02These 4 advanced features unlock Geminis true power
09.02PFC, REC shares fall up to 3% after merger announcement
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .