Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

09.01Lumus brought a massively wider FOV to smartglasses at CES 2026
08.01Handwriting is my new favorite way to text with the Meta Ray-Ban Display glasses
08.01IXIs autofocusing lenses are almost ready to replace multifocal glasses
08.01Razer put a waifu in a bottle at CES 2026
08.01YouTube will let you exclude Shorts from search results
08.01Hands-on with Fender Audio's headphones and speakers at CES 2026
08.01Emerson Smart brings offline voice control to lamps and fans
08.01Engadget's best of CES 2026: All the new tech that caught our eye in Las Vegas
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

09.01Ofcom urged to use 'banning' powers over X AI deepfakes
09.01Friday Watch
09.01US market breadth signals underlying strength amid global uncertainty: Arvind Sanger
09.01BHEL shares rally 5% after hitting lower circuit on China concerns. Should you buy, sell or hold?
09.01China factor explained: Jefferies and JM Financial analysts decode the upside and risks for BHEL shares after 10% crash
09.01Iran protests: Who is exiled crown prince Reza Pahlavi, son of last Shah, ousted in 1979 by Khomeini, now drawing huge support
09.01Midcap multibagger stock tumbles 13% as Q3 net profit drops 33% to Rs 72 crore
09.01Iran Protests: From 1979 Islamic Revolution to the current rial crisis, a look at Irans long history of street protests
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .