Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

26.01Canva introduces interface language for the chronically online
25.01Outside Parties is the creepiest Playdate game yet, and I'm kind of obsessed
25.01Microsoft releases second emergency Windows 11 update to fix Outlook crashes
25.01Apple reportedly plans to reveal its Gemini-powered Siri in February
25.01Yoshi and Birdo arrive in new trailer for The Super Mario Galaxy Movie, along with an earlier release date
24.01Report reveals that OpenAI's GPT-5.2 model cites Grokipedia
24.01Google says it's working to fix Gmail issue that's led to flooded inboxes and increased spam warnings
24.01US Congress members call for 'thorough review' of EA's $55 billion sale
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

26.01Tanker crash captain denies falling asleep
26.01EU investigates Elon Musk's X over Grok AI sexual deepfakes
26.01Good leaders dont shut down when employees push backthey do this instead
26.01Asian Paints Q3 Preview: PAT seen up 8% YoY; volume growth to pick up
26.01Father-son plan soft opening of Richton Park Fresh Market this week
26.01Davos reveals mixed messages on CEO confidenceand new narratives on AI
26.01What is situational retirementand should you give it a try?
26.01Make stealing time a crime: How to protect your most valuable resource
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .