Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

16.01Lidl takes over restaurants to let chefs make the case for plant-based eating
16.01Ray's Blocked Engadget Test Article
16.01Kathleen Kennedy steps down as Lucasfilm president, marking a new era for the Star Wars franchise
16.01Senate passes minibus bill funding NASA, rejecting Trump's proposed cuts
15.01A $250 billion trade deal will see Taiwan bring more semiconductor production to the US
15.01Bluesky's 'Live Now' badge is available to everyone
15.01Amazon's New World: Aeternum MMO will go offline January 31, 2027
15.01Netflix's expanded Sony deal includes streaming rights to the Legend of Zelda movie
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

16.01Oak Park and River Forest student who headlined at Chicago Fashion Week at 16 preparing for international stage
16.01Chipotles burrito wrappers are about to get a whole lot glitzier
16.01NYC has a major delivery problem. These architects have a big vision to fix it
16.01Hondas futuristic new logo is ready for a Tron cameo
16.01A subreddit dedicated to the bald community may be the most wholesome corner of the internet 
16.01Roblox launched age-verification rules. Days later, age-verified accounts were available on eBay
16.01The world is getting tougher on kids online safety in 2026
16.01Are we ready for OpenAI to put ads into ChatGPT? 
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .