Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

26.12LG will show off a humanoid robot for household chores at CES 2026
26.12Apple will allow third-party app stores and payment processing in Brazil
26.12How to find lost AirPods
26.12Xiaomi's 17 Ultra Leica Edition smartphone comes with a manual zoom ring
25.12How to set up a PS5 for a child
25.12How to transfer your games to the Nintendo Switch 2
25.122025 Christmas Day NFL games: How to watch, full streaming schedule and more
24.12Daily is taking a break. Well be back on January 5th!
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

26.12US stocks hover at record highs in quiet trading as gold and silver jump
26.12LG will show off a humanoid robot for household chores at CES 2026
26.12Why your holiday gift returns might go to a landfill and what you can do about it
26.12Apple will allow third-party app stores and payment processing in Brazil
26.12Southern California hit with evacuation warnings after a powerful new Christmas Day storm
26.125 things business leaders must consider for success in 2026
26.12The future of the sperm industry
26.12The winning $1.817 billion Powerball ticket was drawn on Christmas Eve. Heres where it was sold
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .