Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

06.12Engadget review recap: Dell 16 Premium, Nikon ZR, Ooni Volt 2 and more
06.12A Marvel beat-'em-up, long-awaited survival horror and other new indie games worth checking out
05.12The 1977 cut of Star Wars will return to theaters in 2027
05.12Meta's latest acquisition suggests hardware plans beyond glasses and headsets
05.12Pixel owners: You can now use your phone as a Switch 2 webcam
05.12Liquid Swords' debut title is a $25 'noir action game' coming next year
05.12Netflix to buy Warner Bros. for $82.7 billion
05.12The Netflix and Warner Bros. deal might be great for shareholders, but not for anyone else
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

06.12Engadget review recap: Dell 16 Premium, Nikon ZR, Ooni Volt 2 and more
06.12A Marvel beat-'em-up, long-awaited survival horror and other new indie games worth checking out
06.12FIIs sell Rs 11,820 cr worth of Indian stks in first week of December
06.12Nifty ends flat as resistance holds; cautious optimism likely for coming week
06.12Waymo wants to bring self-driving taxis to Illinois. Does the Land of Lincoln want them?
06.12The Mad Men are dead! Long live the new advertising lions!
06.12BSE PSU index rejig: RailTel gets entry, 4 stocks deboarded. Do you own any?
06.12Dec 22 index rejig: ITC Hotels, Reliance Power among 32 fresh additions to BSE 500. Check changes in SME, others
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .