Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

23.01TikTok finalizes deal for its US entity
23.01Sennheiser introduces new TV headphones bundle with Auracast
22.01Darth Maul's standalone series premieres on Disney+ on April 6
22.01JBL made a pair of AI-powered practice amps
22.01Telly has only delivered 35,000 of its free televisions with always-on ads
22.01David Ellison extends deadline for Warner Bros. Discovery takeover offer
22.01Fable will let you be a heartless landlord this fall
22.01Double Fine announces delightful-looking multiplayer pottery game Kiln
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

23.01Free air fryers to help people cook more healthily
23.01This tech could keep EVs from stressing the gridand save everyone money
23.01Why the Minnesota National Guard is being forced to dress like crossing guards
23.01This battery company from MIT helps factories ditch fossil fuels for cheap renewable power
23.01Why you should stop relying on self-discipline and do this instead
23.01Im a tech CEO. Heres why my employees are required to work a restaurant shift
23.01How to make your out-of-office emails a little spicier (with examples)
23.01Heathrow scraps 100ml liquid container limit
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .