Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

27.12OpenAI is hiring a new Head of Preparedness to try to predict and mitigate AI's harms
27.12Heres the first real look at the Retroid Pocket 6 running PS2 games
27.12Stardew Valley players on the Nintendo Switch 2 get a free upgrade
26.12New York State will require warning labels on social media platforms
26.12What we listened to in 2025
26.12You may soon be able to change your Gmail address
26.12LG announces line of premium gaming monitors that offer 5K visuals
26.12Our favorite books we read in 2025
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

27.12OpenAI is hiring a new Head of Preparedness to try to predict and mitigate AI's harms
27.12Heres the first real look at the Retroid Pocket 6 running PS2 games
27.12Stardew Valley players on the Nintendo Switch 2 get a free upgrade
27.12Bangladesh's new political party aims to unite hindus, other minorities
27.12MCX among 3 stocks to go ex-date for bonus issue, stock split next week. Do you own any?
27.12Clarendon Hills Lions Club marks 75th anniversary by carrying its mission forward
27.12Tucked away in a downtown Chicago office building, fallen e-commerce star Groupon is ready for a comeback
27.12'Families can save 200 a month at community shop'
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .