Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

18.12Dolby and LG introduce a modular home audio system for CES 2026
18.12China reportedly has a prototype EUV machine built by ex-ASML employees
17.12A Facebook test makes link-sharing a paid feature for creators
17.12Astronomers find mysterious lemon-shaped exoplanet with NASA's Webb telescope
17.12Jared Isaacman is NASA's new leader
17.12Billboard's charts are increasingly weighted towards on-demand streaming, but not enough for YouTube
17.12The first post-EA FIFA soccer sim will be a Netflix Games exclusive
17.12Study links Amazon's algorithmic pricing with erratic, inflated costs for school districts
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

18.12Private Banks, Energy and IT offer value in subdued market: Mark Matthews
18.12India valuations fair, earnings key to upside over next 12 months: Mark Matthews
18.12Soup kitchen serves 120 meals in 16 minutes
18.12Thursday Watch
18.12Santosh Rao sees market rotation, not a Santa rally at year-end
18.12What dating is like in 2025 for the unemployed
18.12How to spot culture risks at your company when you can still fix them
18.12The introverts networking playbook
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .