Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

29.01Tesla is killing off its Model S and X cars to make robots
29.01Halide co-founder joins Apple's design team
28.01Mark Zuckerberg says Reality Labs will (eventually) stop losing so much money
28.01Astronomers share new insights about the early universe via the Webb Space Telescope
28.01Februarys PS Plus Monthly Games include Undisputed and Subnautica: Below Zero
28.01Patreon creators have to switch to subscription billing by November, thanks to Apple
28.01Native Instruments enters into insolvency proceedings, leaving its future uncertain
28.01Google brings its Nano Banana image generator to Chrome
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

29.01ETMarkets Smart Talk | Capex and consumption may steal the show in Budget 2026: UTI AMCs Karthikraj Lakshmanan
29.01Regulatory reset done, capital markets set to accelerate: Raamdeo Agrawal
29.01Tesla sees first annual revenue drop as it shifts to AI and robots
29.01Positive Breakout: These 12 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
29.01Gold extends record rally, US stock futures drop
29.01Tesla is killing off its Model S and X cars to make robots
29.01Sebi at odds over conflict of interest rules for top brass
29.01Brokerages stay constructive on Persistent despite recent underperformance
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .