Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

25.11The Top Frustrations B2B Buyers Have With Vendors
25.11How US Professionals Are Building Their Personal Brands [Infographic]
25.11Brand vs. Branding: Aligning Your Brand and Branding Builds Perception and Trust
25.11Bristol rolls out mobile clean energy hub for summer festivals and concerts
24.11Bailey Hikawas iPhone grip for Apple shows accessible design can fuel mainstream demand
22.11Wind-powered trimaran cuts Atlantic shipping time in half, with near-zero emissions
21.11AI Update, November 21, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
20.11The Most Appropriate and Inappropriate Emojis at Work [Infographic]
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

26.11Rate cut speculation and Fed Chair rumors keeping markets on edge: Ed Yardeni
26.11While AI targets corner offices, hourly workers are left behind
26.11Wednesday Watch
26.11Oil stabilises after Ukraine peace talks push prices to one-month lows
26.11Excelsoft Technologies shares to list today. Check GMP ahead of debut
26.11Foreign tourists to pay extra fee to visit US national parks
26.11New Zealand woman gets life sentence for 'suitcase murders' of her children
26.11Asian stocks extend gains on Fed rate-cut bets
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .