Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

14.02Airbnb is testing out AI search with a 'small percentage' of users
14.02Disney accuses ByteDance of 'virtual smash-and-grab' when using copyrighted works to train its AI
14.02What to read this weekend: The unsettling new horror novel, Persona
14.02OpenAI has officially retired the controversial GPT-4o model
14.02Watch the NASA SpaceX Crew-12 mission dock with the ISS
14.02Homeland Security has reportedly sent out hundreds of subpoenas to identify ICE critics online
14.02How to customize your iPhone home screen with iOS 26
14.02Relooted, Reanimal and other new indie games worth checking out
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.02One year later, Skokie residents, businesses still suffer from massive water main break
14.02Airbnb is testing out AI search with a 'small percentage' of users
14.02Soaring coffee prices rewrite some Americans daily routines
14.02Disney accuses ByteDance of 'virtual smash-and-grab' when using copyrighted works to train its AI
14.02What to read this weekend: The unsettling new horror novel, Persona
14.02OpenAI has officially retired the controversial GPT-4o model
14.02Watch the NASA SpaceX Crew-12 mission dock with the ISS
14.02TSA agents are working without pay at US airports due to another shutdown
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .