Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

11.01Google's new commerce framework cranks up the heat on 'agentic shopping'
11.01California's governor plans to set aside $200 million for state EV tax credits
11.01Wing's drone deliveries are coming to 150 more Walmarts
10.01Elon Musk says X's new algorithm will be made open source next week
10.01GameStop reportedly shuts down more than 400 US stores
10.01An Instagram data breach reportedly exposed the personal info of 17.5 million users
10.01Dont count on Baldurs Gate 3 coming to Switch 2, as least for now
10.01SpaceX can deploy 7,500 more Starlink Gen2 satellites with FCC approval
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

12.01Andrew Freris on political pressure on the Fed, soaring gold and where to invest in a Messy world
12.01Vets under corporate pressure to increase revenue, BBC told
12.01Monday Watch
12.01Q3 likely to be modest for IT, commentary more crucial than numbers: Sandip Agarwal
12.01CPI, Chips and Court Rulings: What could move US markets this week
12.01After blockbuster 2025, metal stocks tumble up to 10% weekly this year. Whats ahead?
12.01Sensex suffers the worst start to a year in a decade. What this selloff means for investors?
12.01At record high! Gold prices jump Rs 2,000, silver rallies Rs 10,000: What's fuelling the surge?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .