Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

06.03Old laptop, new OS: Back Market pilots ChromeOS Flex on USB for $3
05.03Corona Cero maps sunlight to help urban workers find better spots for lunch breaks
04.03Soccer club PSG scales from a sold-out 10K in Paris to year-round run clubs worldwide
03.03The new creative class? Amsterdam agency recruits 70-somethings to tackle client briefs
02.03Nine out of ten women say sex ed failed them. This company is pushing back
28.02This retro-inspired handheld comes with Banjo-Kazooie and Battletoads built in
28.02Alaska could be the next state to crack down on AI-generated CSAM and restrict kids' social media use
28.02Shuttered studio Bluepoint reportedly pitched a Bloodborne remake, but it got shot down by FromSoftware
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

06.03Tomorrow's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
06.03Bull Radar
06.03Bear Radar
06.03Stocks Falling into Final Hour on Long-Term Rate Rise, Economy/Earnings Outlook Jitters, Oil Surge, Transport/Metals & Mining Sector Weakness
06.03Friday Watch
06.03Old laptop, new OS: Back Market pilots ChromeOS Flex on USB for $3
05.03Terry Savage: Bigger tax refunds are coming to seniors, but only if they file a return
05.03Aurora planning commission recommends approval of data center regulations
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .