Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

16.02Hideki Sato, known as the father of Sega hardware, has reportedly died
15.02Terminator Zero showrunner confirms the Netflix anime has been canceled after one season
15.02The official Pokémon pinball machine has an animatronic Pikachu and a Master Ball plunger
15.02At its Madrid megastore, Fnac turns Valentines Day into a cultural speed dating event
15.02Apple may be adding a splash of color to its upcoming budget-friendly MacBook
15.02Tesla CarPlay is coming but it's reportedly being held back by low iOS 26 adoption numbers
14.02Airbnb is testing out AI search with a 'small percentage' of users
14.02Disney accuses ByteDance of 'virtual smash-and-grab' when using copyrighted works to train its AI
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

16.02The 10 tricks I used to make my rented room into a home
16.02Fresh legal snag may delay NSEs long-awaited public debut
16.02Corporate revenues jump most in six quarters on GST push
16.02Short-term yields fall on surplus liquidity
16.02Traders stay guarded as Nifty turns range-bound, support at 25,100 zone
16.02Global Markets | China's stock bull run falters with earnings set to underwhelm
16.02AI bubble fears are creating new derivatives
16.02FPIs trim bearish bets, but no rush to buy yet
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .