Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

31.01Highguard, a hyperpop arena shooter and other new indie games worth checking out
30.01NASA used Claude to plot a route for its Perseverance rover on Mars
30.01Rivian made an electric ambulance for Grey's Anatomy
30.01Sundance doc 'Ghost in the Machine' draws a damning line between AI and eugenics
30.01Sonos home theater gear is up to 20 percent off ahead of Super Bowl LX
30.01The best cheap VPN in 2026
30.01The first season of Amazon's Fallout show is now free on Youtube
30.01How to watch the 2026 Grammy Awards: TV channel, start time, where to stream, nominations list and more
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

31.01Highguard, a hyperpop arena shooter and other new indie games worth checking out
31.01Ahead of Market: 10 things that will decide stock market action on Sunday
31.01Market Trading Guide: Buy CCL Products, Aurobindo Pharma on Feb 1 for up to 8% upside. Heres why
31.01India Beyond the US: A new era of global partnerships
31.01Home and studio of R. Harold Zook, Hinsdales Frank Lloyd Wright, gets funding boost for preservation
31.01Monday's Earnings/Economic Releases of Note; Market Movers
31.01Stocks Falling into Afternoon on Bursting Metals Bubble, Less Dovish Fed Speculation, Technical Selling, Commodity/Tech Sector Weakness
31.01Weekly Scoreboard*
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .