Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

11.12US could demand five-year social media history from tourists before allowing entry
11.12For homesick students and expats, Proton and Aries weave a VPN into a blanket
11.12Mewgenics, the next game from The Binding of Isaac's developer, will arrive next February on PC
10.12The NES game Jaws is getting a retro physical re-release on Switch and PS5
10.12Apple TV and Apple Music were down for some users
10.12Meta is reportedly working on a new AI model called 'Avocado' and it might not be open source
10.12Spotify's new playlist feature gives users more control over their recommendation algorithm
10.12Intel loses its latest challenge to 16-year-old EU antitrust case
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

11.12Tube fares to go up by 5.8% in 2026
11.12West Loop 4-bedroom penthouse with wraparound terrace: $4M
11.12US could demand five-year social media history from tourists before allowing entry
11.12This startup is building a network of home batteries to help solve the grids woes
11.12Is it really so bad to be fake at work?
11.12The hardest startup in America 
11.12OpenAI turns 10 today. Where will it be in another decade?
11.122 top stock recommendations from Rahul Sharma for near term
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .