Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

19.02Mark Zuckerberg testifies in social media addiction trial that Meta just wants Instagram to be 'useful'
19.02Dyson announces the PencilWash wet floor cleaner
18.02Gemini can now generate a 30-second approximation of what real music sounds like
18.02Cyberpunk platformer Replaced has once again been delayed
18.02Nevada sues Kalshi for operating a sports gambling market without a license
18.02Here's what to expect at Apple's product launch event on March 4
18.02Spotify debuts SeatGeek integration for concert ticket sales
18.02Google Pixel 10a vs. Pixel 9a: What's changed and which one should you buy?
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

19.02Oil prices dip as investors assess trajectory of US-Iran tensions
19.02Why there's no quick fix in sight for the problem of dazzling headlights
19.02India set to become a meaningful part of LGT biz; regulatory complexity a hurdle: Prince Max von und zu Liechtenstein
19.02Metal stocks glitter on Dalal Street, eye stronger March quarter
19.02The two farms in Senegal that supply many of the UK's vegetables
19.02Indias steel sector gears up for primary market boom in coming months
19.02Instant redemption helps lure retail investors to liquid funds
19.02Not doomsday, AI will Ring in modernisation: C S Venkatakrishnan, Barclays
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .