Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.12Apple escalates its appeal of a $2 billion fine from a UK antitrust lawsuit
28.12Ubisoft is rolling back Rainbow Six Siege servers after being forced to shut them down
28.12Ayaneo's latest Game Boy remake will have an early bird starting price of $269
28.12Samsung's two new speakers will deliver crisp audio while blending into your decor
27.12OpenAI is hiring a new Head of Preparedness to try to predict and mitigate AI's harms
27.12Heres the first real look at the Retroid Pocket 6 running PS2 games
27.12Stardew Valley players on the Nintendo Switch 2 get a free upgrade
26.12New York State will require warning labels on social media platforms
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

28.12Dec 28, Free Leadership Assessment Tools & Templates
28.12While Youre Returning Gifts, Traders Make Their Moves: Why the Week After Christmas Determines Your Q1 2026 Returns
28.12Apple escalates its appeal of a $2 billion fine from a UK antitrust lawsuit
28.12Ubisoft is rolling back Rainbow Six Siege servers after being forced to shut them down
28.12Here are the best free tools for discovering new music online
28.12Ayaneo's latest Game Boy remake will have an early bird starting price of $269
28.12Former Chicago Bears player Khalil Herbert lists Buffalo Grove home for $630,000
28.12Late shopper rush drives Boxing Day sales traffic
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .