Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

14.11AI Update, November 14, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
14.11ARTIS becomes the worlds first dark sky zoo, restoring darkness in a light-flooded city
13.11With its deliberately incomplete truck, Toyota asks rural communities to finish the job
13.11How SaaS Solution Preferences Are Evolving [Infographic]
13.11How AI Is Reshaping the Modern Marketing Org
13.11AEO Optimization Checklists: How to Make Your Press Releases More Visible
12.11Smart yet simple compass empowers people with dementia to head out on their own
12.11The AI, Device, and Media Habits of Gen Alpha Teens in the US
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

15.11Brazilian coffee, beef and tropical fruit will still be tariffed 40%, says Brazils vice president
15.1125 movies, many stars, 0 hits: Hollywood falls to new lows
15.11Local 150 members, politicians picket outside Michigan City data center site
15.11President Trump, like Biden before him, finds theres no quick fix on inflation
15.11Make America Grate Again: Trump vs MTG in epic MAGA maelstrom after she tries to maim H-1B visas
15.11The NFL spent millions to transform Real Madrids stadium for a single game
15.11Yeti just did the unthinkable: Hire an ad agency
15.11Rich Dad Poor Dad author Robert Kiyosaki says Bitcoin slump wont sway him, bets on The Big Print boosting gold, silver, crypto
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .