Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

29.01Maingear's latest retro gaming desktop takes you back to the Quake era
29.01Spotify has a group messaging feature now
29.01A Waymo robotaxi struck a child near a school
29.01Honda vehicles used to proactively report road safety issues in nation-first pilot
29.01Google will pay $135 million to settle illegal data collection lawsuit
29.01The Nex Playground is everything Xbox Kinect wanted to be
29.01Apple TV signs TV and movie deal for Brandon Sanderson's fantasy books
29.01Are VPNs really safe? The security factors to consider before using one
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

29.01Maingear's latest retro gaming desktop takes you back to the Quake era
29.01Spotify has a group messaging feature now
29.01This AI startup wants to be your virtual computer for business
29.01An inventory boomerang just hit the housing market
29.01How to dial down the AI slop on platforms
29.01A big Starbucks Rewards overhaul is coming. What it means for your stars
29.01AI face swapping video could be a bonanza for scammers
29.01Five practices that fuel success in great leaders
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .