Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

26.02New Webb Telescope photos show off the Exposed Cranium Nebula
25.02Snap is hosting its own creator awards show
25.02Skate's developer is laying off staff before the game leaves early access
25.02The next Assassin's Creed game loses its creative director
25.02Canadian government demands safety changes from OpenAI
25.02Xbox consoles now support 1440p streaming
25.02Tecno just unveiled a ridiculously thin modular smartphone concept design
25.02HP says RAM now accounts for more than a third of its PC costs
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

26.02Canada's finance minister says US is unlikely to lift tariffs
26.02Positive Breakout: These 13 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
26.02US Stock Market | Wall Street extends tech-powered rally as AI worries abate; Nvidia reports
26.02Global Market Today | Asian stocks climb, Nvidia pares earlier gains
26.02Export uncertainty may dull domestic momentum for solar companies
26.02SP Group's Rs 25,000 crore bond issue price likely to be lower
26.02Metal stocks rise 7%, analysts see potential upside of up to 25%
26.02The family-owned soda firm that still uses returnable glass bottles
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .