Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

03.12What Are the Attributes of Great Digital Ad Creative?
03.12From Flash to Function: How AI Is Powering PR and B2B Marketing Operations
03.12In a Bangkok mall, NEXTOPIA presents a hands-on, optimistic approach to sustainability
02.12How Often Should Brands Be Sending Messages?
02.12The State of 'Job Hugging' Among US Workers [Infographic]
02.12The 72-Hour Webinar Follow-Up Playbook That Converts B2B Leads Faster
02.12Five Shifts to Help B2B Marketers Stop Marketing Like a Machine
02.12Colruyt debuts 24/7 plant-based pop-up on Brussels campus to drive protein transition
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

04.12Energy grid investment of 28bn to push up household bills
04.12Jayesh Mehta flags relentless FPI outflows as key driver of rupee weakness
04.12Putin calls talks with US on ending the Ukraine war 'useful' but also 'difficult work'
04.12Porn company fined 1m over inadequate age checks
04.12Bentley, BMW, Rolls-Royce and more on what makes a luxury car
04.12Working mothers are still being left out of career growth. How we can fix that
04.12Are Americans drinking less? New data says yes, but not by much
04.12Global markets brace for Central Bank signals as Fed rate cut bets strengthen
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .