Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

12.09AI Update, September 12, 2025: AI News and Views From the Past Week
12.09When phone batteries drain, Vodafone steps in with free replacements
11.09What Is 'Unbossing'? And Do Workers Want It? [Infographic]
11.09Adtech's Publisher-First Era: How SSPs Must Adapt to Survive
11.09Ralph Laurens new AI stylist, Ask Ralph, delivers custom style advice and curated outfits
10.09What Stops Marketers From Getting the Most Out of Data?
10.09Why B2B Brands Should Stop Selling--and Start Teaching
10.09Perfume shop in Swedish forest asks people to pay with their time instead of their kronor
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.09Unlimited contactless cards may lead to spending sprees
14.09Unlimited contactless cards may lead to spending sprees
13.09FAA seeks $3.1 million in fines from Boeing over safety violations, 2024 midair panel blowout
13.09Moderna shares hit a low after report suggests the FDA plans to tie COVID shots to child deaths
13.09Tariffs face legal threat that puts Trumps deficit plan at risk
13.09Trump administration moves to stop requiring polluters to report emissions
13.09Donald Trump calls on NATO countries to stop buying Russian oil and threatens 50% to 100% tariffs on China
13.09China proposes rule changes to ease gold imports and exports
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .