Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

14.02Relooted, Reanimal and other new indie games worth checking out
13.02Bitcoin biopic starring Casey Affleck to use AI to generate locations and tweak performances
13.02Valve's latest Steam beta lets you add your PC's specs to game reviews
13.02Nintendos Virtual Boy accessory lets you play VR Mario and Zelda on Switch 2
13.02Good Luck, Have Fun, Don't Die rails against AI in style
13.02AI Update, February 13, 2026: AI News and Views From the Past Week
13.02Meta is reportedly working to bring facial recognition to its smart glasses
13.02The ridiculously tiny Kodak Charmera captured our hearts (and lots of shoddy pictures)
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

14.02Dalal Street Week Ahead: Protect gains, avoid fresh longs until key levels hold
14.02Relooted, Reanimal and other new indie games worth checking out
14.02Bangladeshs interests come first, says BNP chairman and PM-designate Tarique Rahman
14.02Love is in the air in Lincoln Square: Couples share how they met in the neighborhood this Valentines Day
14.02Anupam Rasayan Q3 net profit rises 12% on higher revenue
14.02Homebuilder lot supply jumps so fast that 2 housing markets are now significantly oversupplied
14.02The hidden costs of becoming an expat
14.02F&O Talk | Nifty breaches 20 & 100-DMA amid 11% VIX spike; Sudeep Shah on Coforge, 5 other top weekly movers
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .