Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

06.02Thailand's health department redefines normal sweetness for drinks, reducing sugar by 50%
05.02X's latest Community Notes experiment allows AI to write the first draft
05.02Everything we know about Valve's new Steam Machine
05.02Prime members can play Alan Wake 2 for free on Luna
05.02Meta is giving its AI slop feed an app of its own
05.02Project Hail Mary is getting its own LEGO set
05.02The CIA stops publishing The World Factbook
05.02The Switch 2-exclusive co-op adventure Orbitals launches this summer
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

06.02Friday Watch
06.02The hidden risk of building a leadership team with people you know
06.02Why so many meme coins fail almost immediately
06.02LIC shares climb 4% after Q3 results. Should you buy, sell, or hold?
06.02Sebi proposes tighter rules for single-stock derivatives strategy
06.02RBI infuses Rs 50,000 crore into system through OMO
06.02Technical snag at NSDL delays settlement of trades since Tuesday
06.02Select stocks can gain 10-37% on Budget, trade deal boost
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .