Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

05.02Canon unveils a Limited Edition version of its popular G7 X III compact camera
05.02Why Korean Air put a ramen library in its Incheon Airport business lounge
04.02Bipartisan SCAM Act would require online platforms to crack down on fraudulent ads
04.02Games Done Quick's Back to Black 2026 event kicks off tomorrow
04.02Robloxs '4D' creation toolset is now available in open beta
04.02Overwatch will drop the '2' as Jetpack Cat and four other heroes arrive on February 10
04.02X's 'open source' algorithm isn't a win for transparency, researchers say
04.02You can pre-order the Pixel 10a on February 18
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

05.02Thursday Watch
05.02Canon unveils a Limited Edition version of its popular G7 X III compact camera
05.02Sebi to ease fit and proper person criteria
05.02US pitches plan to counter China's dominance of critical mineral supply
05.02Motilal Oswal urges balanced portfolio mix as India-US trade deal lifts sentiment
05.02No immediate steps planned to regulate equity derivatives: Tuhin Kanta Pandey
05.02IT companies tumble on Anthropic shock; some feel its a short alarm
05.02Asian stocks fall after tech selloff, gold gains
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .