Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

31.12Instagram chief: AI is so ubiquitous 'it will be more practical to fingerprint real media than fake media'
31.12How to watch Samsung's "First Look" CES 2026 presentation
31.12January's PS Plus Monthly Games include Need for Speed Unbound and Disney Epic Mickey: Rebrushed
31.12How to use a VPN
31.12How to watch the first-ever Lego CES 2026 press conference live
31.12From 'Dick Clark's New Year's Rockin' Eve' to 'Nashville's Big Bash,' here's how to watch this year's biggest New Year's Eve TV specials
31.12LG announces new line of xboom speakers ahead of CES
30.12The OneXSugar Wallet is an upcoming retro handheld with a 4:3 foldable screen
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

01.01Positive Breakout: These 11 stocks cross above their 200 DMAs
01.01US issues fresh sanctions targeting Venezuela's oil sector
01.01New Year Stock Market Holiday for 2026: Are NSE, BSE closed today on 1 January; Check here
01.01High-conviction bets for 2026 with potential gains of 1139%
01.01Planning to invest Rs 10 lakh in 2026? What should investors keep in mind
01.01Brace for a cold and windy 2026, follow the dharma of asset allocation: Nilesh Shah
01.01After a blockbuster 2025, Indias IPO pipeline signals a busy 2026
01.01Why did Indian equities underperform global markets in 2025?
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .