Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

10.02Iberia caps Madrid-Barcelona airfares at EUR 99 after rail disaster 
09.02Riot Games is laying off half of the 2XKO development team
09.02DOJ may face investigation for pressuring Apple, Google to remove apps for tracking ICE agents
09.02OpenAI starts testing ads in ChatGPT
09.02Here's how to disable Ring's creepy Search Party feature
09.02YouTube TV launches curated subscription packages this week
09.02Apple's Magic Mouse drops to only $68
09.02The first PlayStation State of Play of 2026 will air on February 12
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

10.022 top stock recommendations from Vinay Rajani
10.02BP profits fall after oil prices drop
10.02More solar farms on the way after record renewables auction
10.02BSEs long-term growth trajectory remains strong: Sundararaman Ramamurthy
10.02To sell your ideas, you need to master these 3 types of power
10.02Is this the secret to better brainstorms?
10.025 Big Trust mindsets to build more self-confidence
10.02Tuesday Watch
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .