Xorte logo

News Markets Groups

USA | Europe | Asia | World| Stocks | Commodities



Add a new RSS channel

 
 


Keywords

2024-08-02 01:31:32| Engadget

When most tech companies are challenged with a lawsuit, the expected defense is to deny wrongdoing. To give a reasonable explanation of why the business' actions were not breaking any laws. Music AI startups Udio and Suno have gone for a different approach: admit to doing exactly what you were sued for. Udio and Suno were sued in June, with music labels Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group and Sony Music Group claiming they trained their AI models by scraping copyrighted materials from the Internet. In a court filing today, Suno acknowledged that its neural networks do in fact scrape copyrighted material: "It is no secret that the tens of millions of recordings that Sunos model was trained on presumably included recordings whose rights are owned by the Plaintiffs in this case." And that's because its training data "includes essentially all music files of reasonable quality that are accessible on the open internet," which likely include millions of illegal copies of songs.  But the company is taking the line that its scraping falls under the umbrella of fair use. "It is fair use under copyright law to make a copy of a protected work as part of a back-end technological process, invisible to the public, in the service of creating an ultimately non-infringing new product," the statement reads. Its argument seems to be that since the AI-generated tracks it creates don't include samples, illegally obtaining all of those tracks to train the AI model isn't a problem. Calling the defendants' actions "evading and misleading," the RIAA, which initiated the lawsuit, had an unsurprisingly harsh response to the filing. "Their industrial scale infringement does not qualify as fair use. Theres nothing fair about stealing an artists lifes work, extracting its core value, and repackaging it to compete directly with the originals," a spokesperson for the organization said. "Defendants had a ready lawful path to bring their products and tools to the market obtain consent before using their work, as many of their competitors already have. That unfair competition is directly at issue in these cases." Whatever the next phase of this litigation entails, prepare your popcorn. It should be wild.This article originally appeared on Engadget at https://www.engadget.com/ai/ai-startup-argues-scraping-every-song-on-the-internet-is-fair-use-233132459.html?src=rss


Category: Marketing and Advertising

 

Latest from this category

28.01Mark Zuckerberg was initially opposed to parental controls for AI chatbots, according to legal filing
28.01Meta blocks links to ICE List, a Wiki that names agents
27.01Adobe Photoshop upgrades its Firefly-powered generative-AI editing tools
27.01Astronomers discover over 800 cosmic anomalies using a new AI tool
27.01Sennheiser debuts new models of wired headphones and earbuds
27.01Pornhub will become unavailable for many UK users as of February 2
27.01Apple and Google reportedly still offer dozens of AI nudify apps
27.01Sonos introduces Amp Multi for complicated residential installs
Marketing and Advertising »

All news

28.01Volatile markets split IPO strategies as firms rework listing timelines
28.01Can Income-Plus Arbitrage FoFs deliver stable, tax-efficient returns?
28.01Retired Chicago Fed chief sells Streeterville condo for $2.75M
28.01Auto companies fall on fear of more EU imports
28.01RBI, European body ink MoU to end clearing house standoff
28.01EasyJet warned over 'misleading' 5.99 cabin bag fee
28.01Vulnerable missing out on benefits due to online tool
28.01Vulnerable missing out on benefits due to online tool
More »
Privacy policy . Copyright . Contact form .