 |
|
|
|||||
When we started Equal Research Day on June 10, 2022the anniversary of women finally being included in U.S. clinical research in 1993we intended it to be a celebration of progress and a call for more inclusive science. We wanted to mark how far wed come and how much opportunity still lay ahead. We never imagined that just three years later, wed be fighting to keep that progress from being undone. The Trump administrations ongoing federal actions targeting women, diversity, and equitysuch as budget cuts affecting critical research funding, and the sporadic erasure of critical data and educationhave already caused massive damage and hindered progress for health parity in only five short months. We’re just beginning to wrap our minds around the lost progress and bleak future that we’re facing if there is no change of course. And we don’t have time, let alone four years, to wait on continuing health parity workfor women and for all marginalized groups harmed by the administrations actions. If it feels like we are going back in time, it’s because we are. As founders building the future of womens health, we cant stay quiet. We are witnessing the erasure of womenagain. Medicines long history of leaving women behind While women weren’t required to be included in clinical research until 1993, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) didnt required researchers to account for sex as a biological variable until 2016. While some progress has been made, even in 2024 we were far from closing the research gapparticularly for marginalized and underrepresented groups. Because women have been left out of research for so long, many of the drugs, diagnostics, and standards of care we rely on today were never tested on womens bodies. As a result, women are diagnosed, on average, four years later than men across hundreds of diseases. Women are more likely to die in surgery if their surgeon is a man, and women are twice as likely to die after a heart attack, compared to men. Were more likely to be misdiagnosed, to experience severe medication side effects, and to be told our symptoms are all in our heads. Behind already, we’re taking massive steps backwards in closing the gender health gap and reaching health equity. In 2025, history is repeating itself This year alone, the NIH slashed $2.6 billion in contracts, plus an additional $9.5 billion for research grants, a devastating blow to women’s health research. The Womens Health Initiative (WHI)a decades-long study of 160,000 women, critical for better understanding chronic disease, hormone therapy, and morewas abruptly defunded in April (an apparent reversal to the cut was later confirmed in May), leaving the WHI in limbo for weeks. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) fired 18% of its staff, including entire teams dedicated to maternal health, contraceptive guidance, and drug-resistant sexually transmitted infection (STI) tracking. And the National Science Foundation (NSF) canceled over 1,400 grants, especially those tied to gender, equity, or health disparities. Federal agencies were given directives to reject funding for any research grants that include “banned words” such as “women, trans, or diversity,” at the NIH, and for the NSF, an even longer list, including: -“Female” and “women,” but not male or men -“Male dominated” -“Gender” -“Equity” -“Diversity” -“Minority” -“Underrepresented” -“Antiracist” -“Diversity” -“Trauma” -“Biases” -“Disability” -“Inclusion” -“Victims” -“Racially” This is targeted, strategic, and deeply dangerous for not only women, but for all underserved and under-researched groups that need the funding and research the most. Data and education are disappearing, too As if defunding wasnt enough, the federal government scrubbed over 8,000 public health web pages. These included critical health guidance on contraception, LGBTQ+ health, STIs, and maternal outcomes. Some of the pages were hastily scrubbed and restored while missing key facts, essentially erasing certain groups. The CDC removed or changed key datasets and web pages on the LGBTQ+ community and other underrepresented, marginalized groups. The CDC also pulled fact sheets on HIV prevention, HIV diagnosis, and transmission, and then republished some of the information, leaving out transgender people. The FDA also took down an entire website dedicated to minority health and health equity. This kind of censorship isnt just alarmingits life-threatening. If we cant see the data, we cant measure the problem. And if we cant measure the problem, we can’t fix it. This is more than a research crisis. Its a public health emergency, and it will hit the most vulnerable communities the hardest. The U.S. has the highest maternal mortality rate of any wealthy nation. Erasing programs like PRAMSwhich monitors postpartum complications, means entire states are now totally unequipped to track what happens to postpartum women. Shuttering research labs and programs on STIs, HIV, and sexual health will hinder progress for women’s sexual health and disease prevention, particularly for women and LGBTQ communities. Finally, widespread government directives to cut research funding for anyone who focuses on gender threaten to uno all the progress we’ve made since 1993, and this in turn, hinders what we can change moving forward. We know that when women are under-researched, we pay the highest price. Women already spend 25% more of their lives in worse health than men. And, 64% of common medical interventions are less effective or less accessible for women, compared to only 10% for men. For every woman diagnosed with a womens health issue, approximately four are not diagnosed. (There are 97 similar statistics published in our book, 100 Effed Facts About The Gender Health Gap.) This will only get worse with the current federal actions. What can be done While some companies and researchers are stepping in to fill the void, in reality, no private innovation can replace the scale, accountability, and public good of federally funded research. As founders of a women’s health company, we believe more than anyone about the power of private, high-growth solutions for the world’s most pressing problems. We are doing our part at Evvy. But even we don’t see the path through without government investment. Alone, we simply can’t approach the scope and magnitude of what the government to help the more than 50% of the population who deserve better. Startups can pilot new tools, but they cant collect longitudinal data on maternal mortality across all 50 states. Academic labs can push science forward, but they cant maintain national health surveillance systems. The erosion of public health infrastructure means were losing the connective tissue that links discovery to care. And without it, even the best innovations risk being isolated solutions in a broken system. This isnt just about research; its about rights. Its about refusing to let an entire half of the population be sidelined under the excuse of cost cutting. We need to fund the science that sees us, protect the data that tells our stories, and build a healthcare system where womens bodies are studied, understood, and prioritized. We can fight for funding, for research, for truth. And, most importantly, we can fight to make sure women are never again an afterthought in the story of medicine. To help, join the Equal Research Day campaign to demand equal research funding for women, or donate to nonprofits funding critical research like Womens Health Access Matters and the Foundation for Womens Health.Priyanka Jain is CEO and cofounder of Evvy. Laine Bruzek and Pita Navarro are cofounders of Evvy.
Category:
E-Commerce
A sense of unease has settled over the countrya shared anxiety fueled by headlines, social media, and persistent uncertainty about the future. From escalating conflicts in the Middle East to disturbing incidents of political violence here at home, Americans across the spectrum are grappling with instability and disruption. This isnt just partisan fatigue or angstits a broader disorientation about who we are as a nation and where were headed.As an avid scuba diver, I (Craig) have learned that when seasickness strikes, the best remedy is to focus on the horizon. In times of uncertainty, we need that same kind of long-range perspective. America, while powerful, is relatively young. History is replete with examples of empires experiencing internal strife. Fareed Zakarias Age of Revolutions documents this phenomenon with precision. While historical parallels dont alleviate our present anxieties, they can offer a broader context.One reason this moment feels so disorienting is that theres often a gap between expectations and reality. Many of us grew up with a hopeful, sometimes idealized narrative of American progress and unity. Todays polarized discourse, political violence, and institutional tensions can challenge that view. But rather than disengage, we need to adaptand recommit.In moments of uncertainty, our instincts may be to fight, flee, or freeze. But when we try to do all three at once, we risk exhaustion and paralysis. Freezingtuning out or giving upfeels safe, but its unsustainable. Instead, we advocate for a balanced approach: fight and flight, both with intention. Fight: Civic engagement as a steadying force To fight is to stay constructively engaged. That means seeking out credible, fact-based news. It means voting and encouraging others to do the same. It means participating in civil dialogue and seeking to understand perspectives that differ from our ownempathy can bridge divides. Leaders in business, nonprofits, and communities all have a role to play. Upholding the rule of law, supporting fair elections, and defending the institutions that sustain our economy and civic life arent political actstheyre commitments to stability and shared progress. At Leadership Now Project[DA1] , weve mobilized business leaders from both parties to take action, supporting policies that protect democracy, engaging with policymakers, speaking out publicly, defending election officials, and recognizing courageous leadership. These efforts are grounded in principle, not partisanship, because a strong democracy is essential to a thriving economy. Flight: Protecting peace isnt escapismits strategic Flight doesnt mean tuning outit means stepping back to preserve focus and clarity. In an era of constant information overload, its easy to feel overwhelmed. But we cant let the noise drown out the signal. This means prioritizing what truly matters: health, relationships, and purpose. It means limiting the distractions that drain us and being intentional about how we spend our energy. Whether through mindfulness, service, or simple moments of joy, finding inner stability helps us stay grounded. Its what allows us to show up consistently, over the long term.Holocaust survivor and psychologist Viktor Frankl once wrote that while we cant always control our circumstances, we can choose our response. That mindsetanchoring in purpose and positivity even amid chaoscan help us move forward with clarity and resolve. Find purpose In short: Even in uncertainty, we can find purpose. Even amid division, we can choose to build. The storm may not pass quickly, but we are far from powerless. When we anchor ourselves in valuescuriosity, leadership, accountabilitywe become more resilient. And when we come together across differences, we remind ourselves that the story of this country has always been written by people who chose to engage, to hope, and to act. We are not alone. And the horizon is there to help us refocus. Daniella Ballou-Aares is the founder and CEO of the Leadership Now Project. Craig Robinson is founding member of Leadership Now Project.
Category:
E-Commerce
After 20 years working in sustainability, I thought I understood most levers companies could pull to drive impact. As a former CEO and longtime sustainability leader, I have spent my career trying to drive systems change by making businesses and supply chains more sustainable and resilient, advocating for transparency, championing responsible sourcing, and pushing for more equity in business. In these roles, Ive thought about where companies banked, how 401(k)s were invested, and even how philanthropic dollars could fund this work. Climate finance came up in those contexts, often tied to investors, philanthropy, or policy. But I had never looked closely at insurance. That turned out to be a major oversight but also a lightbulb moment. Why insurance? Insurance is one of the most powerful, least understood systems shaping business and risk. It doesnt just protect value, it influences where value flows in the first place. And once I began to see that, I couldn’t unsee it. The scale is staggering. The industry collects about $8 trillion in premiums each year and manages around $35 trillion in assets. Underwriting decisions influence what gets built, what gets financed, and how companies prepare for risk. These decisions often happen behind the scenes, but they quietly define the boundaries of business. Until recently, I had not considered insurance as a climate lever. Now I see it as an important and underutilized tool to accelerate resilience and impact. Insurance doesnt just reflect risk. It prices it. And pricing influences behavior. When insurers begin to recognize climate-smart practices and reward resilience, they do more than react to a changing world. They help shape it. Insurance and climate That is what led me to join Premiums for the Planet. We work with companies that want to reduce risk, lower costs, and build long-term resilience. Some are vocal about their sustainability goals. Others are making progress quietly, especially in todays political climate, where public conversations around climate and sustainability have become more polarized. But across the board, the work is still happening and insurance can help it go further. Because this is no longer just about climate commitments. It is about business fundamentals and how we can transform business as usual. Insurance is something every company needs and already buys. But few think about how it could be doing more for both their business and the planet. When companies begin to see insurance as a strategic tool, not just a budget line item, they start asking better questions. Are we covered for the risks we are truly facing in a rapidly evolving climate? Do insurers see the investments we have made in sustainability? How can smarter risk management improve our terms or help fund what comes next? Each of these questions opens up opportunities. Companies that explore them often uncover ways to save money, strengthen coverage, and align their insurance strategy with long-term goals. In the short term, insurance can uncover savings and plug gaps. In the medium term, it can enhance business resilience in a warming world and reduce the risks that often go unaccounted for. In the long term, it has the potential to transform an industry that is long overdue for change. That transformation matters. Insurers have the ability to influence entire markets. Their decisions can help slow harmful sectors like fossil fuels and unsustainable land use. Just as importantly, they can help accelerate the growth of renewables, regenerative agriculture, climate technology, and resilient infrastructure by de-risking their development, rewarding their performance, and making them more investable. Insurers as partners Insurers do not need to be cast as villains. The real opportunity is to bring them in as partners. These are institutions that have spent decades pricing risk. They understand long-term exposure. And they are well positioned to help define what a more stable and sustainable economy looks like. But no one company can shift this system on its own, something Ive long believed and know from first-hand experience to be true. The insurance industry is too massive, too interconnected, and too entrenched to move for any single player, no matter how large or committed. Change requires coordination. It takes businesses acting together, sending consistent signals, and demanding better alignment between insurance and climate goals. We often talk about invisible systems. Insurance is one of them. And like any system, it can evolve. At a time when government regulation is either too slow or a barrier to real change, this is a lever that business can pull now. Quietly or publicly. Through bold messaging or internal changes. Either way, it counts. We need to broaden our view of climate finance. That means connecting sustainability and risk teams. It means bringing together operations, procurement, legal, and finance. And it means recognizing that insurance is not just a protective layer. It is a tool for change. The companies that lead in the next decade will not only be more sustainable. They will also be more insurable. Amina Razvi is chief development and operations officer for Premiums for the Planet.
Category:
E-Commerce
All news |
||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||